County · Michigan
Isabella County, Michigan: drinking water records
This overview covers 7 ZIP codes and 12 community water systems in Isabella County. It also stands in for 1 ZIP codes whose utility has too little EPA data for a page of its own.
System population figures are summed from EPA registry records and can overlap where wholesalers and retail systems serve the same people. They are not a Census county-population estimate.
Water systems with the most complete records
| Water system | People served | PFAS survey results | PFAS found | Health-based violations | Lead, 9 in 10 homes at or below |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mount Pleasant MI0004530 | 21,688 | 120 | 0 | 1 | 1.4 ppb |
| Union Township MI0006725 | 12,927 | 180 | 1 | 0 | 2 ppb |
| Shepherd, Village of MI0006030 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1 | not reported |
| Lake Isabella Water Dist. #1 MI0003435 | 327 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41 ppb |
| Mapleview Estates East MI0040219 | 220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 ppb |
| Broomfield Valley MI0040218 | 212 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 ppb |
| Country Place MI0040220 | 115 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 ppb |
| Mapleview Estates MI0040217 | 93 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 ppb |
| Maple Leaf Village MI0040216 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 ppb |
| Rosebush Estates Apartments MI0005823 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 2 | not reported |
| Rosebush Manor MI0005824 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 ppb |
| Country Place Senior Care Center MI0001649 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | not reported |
ZIP reports in Isabella County
No ZIP report in this county is published yet.
These ZIP codes are covered by this overview because their utility has too little EPA data for a separate page: 48896.
Sources and scope
EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.
Counts cover the systems that report this county to EPA. A water system may cross county lines. "Found" means at least one result at or above the laboratory reporting level; it is not a compliance finding.