Tap Water Lookup

EPA system CA3810011 · California

Sfpuc City Distribution Division: No PFAS or lithium found in EPA testing

System ID CA3810011; community water system; California; source: purchased surface water; serves 848,019 people via 171,099 connections; status: active

In focus848,019people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLead, 90th percentile at customer taps
Lead, 90th percentile at customer taps: 0 ppb; action level 15 ppb. 90th percentile for the latest monitoring period.0 ppbaction level: 15 ppb

90th percentile for the latest monitoring period; sampled Dec 31, 2024. Source: EPA SDWIS/ECHO.

Sfpuc City Distribution Division is a local-government-owned community water system in California serving about 848,019 people, matched to 27 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
24 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
24 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 9 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
24 samples, none above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · not detected above the reporting level
0 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
720 results, 6 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
0 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2024
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
0 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (8 of 8 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 8 of 24 sampling events

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found none of them at levels its laboratories can measure.

Between March 2023 and March 2024, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 720 samples from 6 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). None were found above their minimum reporting levels.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
No contaminant was detected above its reporting level.
Show the 30 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Lithiumnot detected · reporting level 9 ppb
< 9 ppb
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
11Cl-PF3OUdS240< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
4:2 FTS240< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
6:2 FTS240< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
8:2 FTS240< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
9Cl-PF3ONS240< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
ADONA240< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
HFPO-DA (GenX)240< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
Lithium240< 9 ppb10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
NEtFOSAA240< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
NFDHA240< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
NMeFOSAA240< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
PFBA240< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
PFBS240< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
PFDA240< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
PFDoA240< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
PFEESA240< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
PFHpA240< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
PFHpS240< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
PFHxA240< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
PFHxS240< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
PFMBA240< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
PFMPA240< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
PFNA240< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
PFOA240< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
PFOS240< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
PFPeA240< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
PFPeS240< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
PFTA240< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
PFTrDA240< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
PFUnA240< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – March 2024
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: no at 16 of 24 sampling events, yes at 8 of 24 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 23 of 24 sampling events, not known at 1 of 24 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 8 of 8 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 0 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. The action level has been reached in 2 of the 20 periods on record.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001: 7 ppbJan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001: 7 ppbJan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004: 12 ppbJan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004: 18 ppbJan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006: 5.3 ppbJan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006: 7 ppbJan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009: 7 ppbJan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012: 11 ppbJan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015: 5 ppbJan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018: 6 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021: 7.6 ppbJan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024: 0 ppbDec 31, 2001Dec 31, 20240 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 0 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb; 2 of the 20 monitoring periods on record reached the action level. The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead7.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead11 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006Lead5.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004Lead18 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 20 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead7.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead11 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006Lead5.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004Lead18 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000Lead13 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1994 – Dec 31, 1994Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Dec 31, 1993Lead5.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead18 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead13 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists no drinking-water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.

EPA's SDWIS database lists no drinking water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.

None on file.

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Mar 14, 2023 (sanitary survey); 1 visit since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified for lead reduction

2 of this utility's 20 lead monitoring periods on record reached the 15 ppb action level (most recent 90th percentile 0 ppb).

NSF/ANSI 53 with a lead-reduction claim, or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. Lead comes from plumbing, so a point-of-use filter at the kitchen tap is the relevant type.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records