Tap Water Lookup

EPA system FL2180863 · Florida

City of Palm Coast Utility: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID FL2180863; community water system; Florida; source: groundwater; serves 112,324 people via 49,992 connections; status: active

In focus112,324people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 13.5 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.13.5 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled March 2025–September 2025. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

City of Palm Coast Utility is a privately owned community water system in Florida serving about 112,324 people, matched to 4 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
6 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
6 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
13.5 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
3 of 6 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
0 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
172 results, 3 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
1.3 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 1, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
5 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (6 of 6 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 6 of 6 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 1. Lithium reached 13.5 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between March 2025 and September 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 172 samples from 3 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 1 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Lithium reached 13.5 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
13.5 ppb
at or above the health reference level
Show the 29 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium6313.5 ppb11.4 ppb (2 of 2)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
11Cl-PF3OUdS60< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
4:2 FTS60< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
6:2 FTS60< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
8:2 FTS60< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
9Cl-PF3ONS60< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
ADONA60< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
HFPO-DA (GenX)60< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
NEtFOSAA40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
NFDHA60< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
NMeFOSAA40< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
PFBA60< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
PFBS60< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
PFDA60< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
PFDoA60< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
PFEESA60< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
PFHpA60< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
PFHpS60< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
PFHxA60< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
PFHxS60< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
PFMBA60< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
PFMPA60< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
PFNA60< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
PFOA60< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
PFOS60< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
PFPeA60< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
PFPeS60< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
PFTA40< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
PFTrDA40< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
PFUnA60< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – September 2025
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (3 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Mar 10, 2025WTP #1 POE WTP #1 (Lime Softening Plant)ground waterLithium9.3 ppb9 ppb
Sep 24, 2025WTP #1 POE WTP #1 (Lime Softening Plant)ground waterLithium13.5 ppb9 ppb
Sep 24, 2025WTP #2 POE WTP #2 (Membrane Softening Plant)ground waterLithium9.4 ppb9 ppb

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 6 of 6 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 6 of 6 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 6 of 6 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 1, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 1.3 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. The action level has been reached in 1 of the 17 periods on record.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998: 5.8 ppbJan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001: 3.3 ppbJan 1, 2001 – Dec 1, 2004: 1.7 ppbJan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2004: 1.7 ppbJul 1, 2007 – Dec 1, 2007: 1.9 ppbJan 1, 2010 – Dec 1, 2010: 1.8 ppbJan 1, 2013 – Dec 1, 2013: 0 ppbJan 1, 2016 – Dec 1, 2016: 1.6 ppbJan 1, 2017 – Dec 1, 2017: 12.8 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Dec 1, 2019: 0.9 ppbJan 1, 2022 – Dec 1, 2022: 1.2 ppbJan 1, 2025 – Dec 1, 2025: 1.3 ppbDec 31, 1998Dec 1, 20251.3 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 1, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 1.3 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb; 1 of the 17 monitoring periods on record reached the action level. The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 1, 2025Lead1.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 1, 2022Lead1.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 1, 2019Lead0.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 1, 2017Lead12.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 1, 2016Lead1.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 1, 2013Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 1, 2010Lead1.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2007 – Dec 1, 2007Lead1.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2004Lead1.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 1, 2004Lead1.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead3.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead5.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 17 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 1, 2025Lead1.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 1, 2022Lead1.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 1, 2019Lead0.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 1, 2017Lead12.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 1, 2016Lead1.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 1, 2013Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 1, 2010Lead1.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2007 – Dec 1, 2007Lead1.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2004Lead1.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 1, 2004Lead1.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead3.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead5.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995Lead9.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1994 – Dec 31, 1994Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1993 – Dec 31, 1993Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Jun 30, 1993Lead9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead21 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 5 violations since Sep 3, 2016. None is health-based. All concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices, not the water itself.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 5 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 4 for monitoring or reporting, 1 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements), none health-based.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Jul 1, 2024OtherConsumer Confidence RuleConsumer Confidence Report Inadequate Reporting1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action
Jan 1, 2023MRLead and Copper RuleFollow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/R1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022MRTotal Haloacetic Acids (Haa5)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021MRTotal Haloacetic Acids (Haa5)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action
Jan 1, 2020MRLead and Copper RuleFollow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/R1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Dec 11, 2024 (sanitary survey); 2 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified for lead reduction

1 of this utility's 17 lead monitoring periods on record reached the 15 ppb action level (most recent 90th percentile 1.3 ppb).

NSF/ANSI 53 with a lead-reduction claim, or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. Lead comes from plumbing, so a point-of-use filter at the kitchen tap is the relevant type.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 13.5 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records