Tap Water Lookup

EPA system ID3140080 · Idaho

Nampa City of: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID ID3140080; community water system; Idaho; source: groundwater; serves 100,200 people via 38,361 connections; status: active

In focus100,200people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 42.1 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.42.1 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled July 2024–October 2025. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Nampa City of is a local-government-owned community water system in Idaho serving about 100,200 people, matched to 3 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
26 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
26 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
42.1 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
26 of 26 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
0 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
780 results, 13 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
2 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2024
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
80 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (14 of 14 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 14 of 26 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 1. Lithium reached 42.1 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between July 2024 and December 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 780 samples from 13 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 1 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Lithium reached 42.1 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
42.1 ppb
at or above the health reference level
Show the 29 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium262642.1 ppb41.1 ppb (2 of 2)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelJuly 2024 – October 2025
11Cl-PF3OUdS260< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – October 2025
4:2 FTS260< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – October 2025
6:2 FTS260< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – October 2025
8:2 FTS260< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – October 2025
9Cl-PF3ONS260< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – October 2025
ADONA260< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – October 2025
HFPO-DA (GenX)260< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – October 2025
NEtFOSAA260< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – December 2025
NFDHA260< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – October 2025
NMeFOSAA260< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – December 2025
PFBA260< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – October 2025
PFBS260< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – October 2025
PFDA260< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – October 2025
PFDoA260< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – October 2025
PFEESA260< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – October 2025
PFHpA260< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – October 2025
PFHpS260< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – October 2025
PFHxA260< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – October 2025
PFHxS260< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – October 2025
PFMBA260< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – October 2025
PFMPA260< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – October 2025
PFNA260< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – October 2025
PFOA260< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – October 2025
PFOS260< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – October 2025
PFPeA260< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – October 2025
PFPeS260< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – October 2025
PFTA260< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – December 2025
PFTrDA260< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – December 2025
PFUnA260< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – October 2025
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (26 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Jul 24, 2024Well #5 Finished Well #5 Treatment Plantground waterLithium15 ppb9 ppb
Jul 24, 2024Well #15 Finished Coventry Well #15 Treatment Plantground waterLithium21.9 ppb9 ppb
Jul 24, 2024New Well #10 Finished New Well #10ground waterLithium15.1 ppb9 ppb
Jul 24, 2024Well #16 Finished Well #16 Treatment Plantground waterLithium42.1 ppb9 ppb
Jul 24, 2024Well #20 Finished Well #20 Treatment Plantground waterLithium18.4 ppb9 ppb
Jul 24, 2024Well #11 Finished Well #11 Treatment Plantground waterLithium20.5 ppb9 ppb
Jul 24, 2024Well #9 Finished Well #9 Treatment Plantground waterLithium15.3 ppb9 ppb
Jul 24, 2024Well #6 Finished Well #6 Treatment Plantground waterLithium20.8 ppb9 ppb
Jul 24, 2024Well #12 Finished Well #12 Treatment Plantground waterLithium15.8 ppb9 ppb
Jul 24, 2024Well #14 Finished Well #14 Treatment Plantground waterLithium15.8 ppb9 ppb
Jul 24, 2024Well #4 Finished Well #4 Treatment Plantground waterLithium12 ppb9 ppb
Jul 24, 2024Well #17 Finished Well #17 Treatment Plantground waterLithium19.8 ppb9 ppb
Jul 24, 2024Well #7 Finished Well #7 Treatment Plantground waterLithium14.3 ppb9 ppb
Jan 15, 2025Well #5 Finished Well #5 Treatment Plantground waterLithium15.4 ppb9 ppb
Jan 15, 2025Well #15 Finished Coventry Well #15 Treatment Plantground waterLithium22 ppb9 ppb
Jan 15, 2025New Well #10 Finished New Well #10ground waterLithium16 ppb9 ppb
Jan 15, 2025Well #16 Finished Well #16 Treatment Plantground waterLithium40.1 ppb9 ppb
Jan 15, 2025Well #20 Finished Well #20 Treatment Plantground waterLithium18.4 ppb9 ppb
Jan 15, 2025Well #11 Finished Well #11 Treatment Plantground waterLithium19.5 ppb9 ppb
Jan 15, 2025Well #6 Finished Well #6 Treatment Plantground waterLithium15.9 ppb9 ppb
Jan 15, 2025Well #12 Finished Well #12 Treatment Plantground waterLithium38.4 ppb9 ppb
Jan 15, 2025Well #14 Finished Well #14 Treatment Plantground waterLithium15 ppb9 ppb
Jan 15, 2025Well #4 Finished Well #4 Treatment Plantground waterLithium12.6 ppb9 ppb
Jan 15, 2025Well #17 Finished Well #17 Treatment Plantground waterLithium20.1 ppb9 ppb
Jan 15, 2025Well #7 Finished Well #7 Treatment Plantground waterLithium13.4 ppb9 ppb
Oct 28, 2025Well #9 Finished Well #9 Treatment Plantground waterLithium14.1 ppb9 ppb

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 14 of 26 sampling events, no at 12 of 26 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 26 of 26 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 14 of 14 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 2 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 15 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1997: 5 ppbJan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 2000: 0 ppbJan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005: 3 ppbJan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008: 2.1 ppbJan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011: 1.7 ppbJan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013: 0 ppbJul 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016: 0 ppbJan 1, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017: 0 ppbJul 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017: 0 ppbJan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018: 0 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021: 0 ppbJan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024: 2 ppbDec 31, 1997Dec 31, 20242 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 2 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (15 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011Lead1.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008Lead2.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 2000Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1997Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 15 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011Lead1.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008Lead2.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 2000Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1997Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1994 – Dec 31, 1994Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Jun 30, 1993Lead14 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 80 violations since Sep 3, 2016. None is health-based. All concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices, not the water itself.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 80 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 80 for monitoring or reporting, none health-based.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Mar 31, 2023MRChlorineMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MREndrinMonitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRBhc-GammaMonitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRToxapheneMonitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRDalaponMonitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRDiquatMonitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MREndothallMonitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRGlyphosateMonitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRDi(2-Ethylhexyl) AdipateMonitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MROxamylMonitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRSimazineMonitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRPicloramMonitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRLassoMonitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRHeptachlor EpoxideMonitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MR2,4-DMonitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRBenzo(A)pyreneMonitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (Pcb)Monitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRDi(2-Ethylhexyl) PhthalateMonitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRCarbofuranMonitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRAtrazineMonitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRHeptachlorMonitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MR2,4,5-TpMonitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRHexachlorobenzeneMonitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MREthylene DibromideMonitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MR1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneMonitoring, Regular1 recordArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Show the remaining 26 violation records
Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRCis-1,2-DichloroethyleneMonitoring, Regular1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRP-DichlorobenzeneMonitoring, Regular1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRCarbon TetrachlorideMonitoring, Regular1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRTrichloroethyleneMonitoring, Regular1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRTetrachloroethyleneMonitoring, Regular1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRTolueneMonitoring, Regular1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MREthylbenzeneMonitoring, Regular1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRStyreneMonitoring, Regular1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRPentachlorophenolMonitoring, Regular2 recordsArchived
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRDinosebMonitoring, Regular2 recordsArchived
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRXylenes, TotalMonitoring, Regular1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRBenzeneMonitoring, Regular1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRVinyl ChlorideMonitoring, Regular1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRChlordaneMonitoring, Regular2 recordsArchived
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MR1,2-Dibromo-3-ChloropropaneMonitoring, Regular2 recordsArchived
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MR1,1,1-TrichloroethaneMonitoring, Regular1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MR1,2-DichloropropaneMonitoring, Regular1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRHexachlorocyclopentadieneMonitoring, Regular2 recordsArchived
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRTrans-1,2-DichloroethyleneMonitoring, Regular1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRMethoxychlorMonitoring, Regular2 recordsArchived
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MR1,1-DichloroethyleneMonitoring, Regular1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRO-DichlorobenzeneMonitoring, Regular1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MR1,2-DichloroethaneMonitoring, Regular1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MR1,1,2-TrichloroethaneMonitoring, Regular1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRDichloromethaneMonitoring, Regular1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022MRChlorobenzeneMonitoring, Regular1 recordArchived

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: May 24, 2022 (sanitary survey); 1 visit since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 42.1 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records