Tap Water Lookup

EPA system IL1970450 · Illinois

Joliet: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID IL1970450; community water system; Illinois; source: groundwater; serves 160,000 people via 49,000 connections; status: active

In focus160,000people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 54.7 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.54.7 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled February 2025–August 2025. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Joliet is a local-government-owned community water system in Illinois serving about 160,000 people, matched to 11 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
22 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
22 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
54.7 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
22 of 22 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
0 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
660 results, 11 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
6.5 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Jun 30, 2026
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
1
health-based violation since Sep 3, 2016
11 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (22 of 22 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 22 of 22 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 1. Lithium reached 54.7 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between February 2025 and August 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 660 samples from 11 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 1 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Lithium reached 54.7 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
54.7 ppb
at or above the health reference level
Show the 29 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium222254.7 ppb53.0 ppb (2 of 2)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
11Cl-PF3OUdS220< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
4:2 FTS220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
6:2 FTS220< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
8:2 FTS220< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
9Cl-PF3ONS220< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
ADONA220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
HFPO-DA (GenX)220< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
NEtFOSAA220< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
NFDHA220< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
NMeFOSAA220< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
PFBA220< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
PFBS220< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
PFDA220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
PFDoA220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
PFEESA220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
PFHpA220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
PFHpS220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
PFHxA220< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
PFHxS220< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
PFMBA220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
PFMPA220< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
PFNA220< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
PFOA220< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
PFOS220< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
PFPeA220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
PFPeS220< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
PFTA220< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
PFTrDA220< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
PFUnA220< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – August 2025
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (22 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Feb 19, 2025Finished Water Tap Tp 1 (Wells 6d-8d & 24d & 101-105)ground waterLithium44.9 ppb9 ppb
Feb 19, 2025Finished Water Tap Tp 6 (Well 5d)ground waterLithium44.6 ppb9 ppb
Feb 19, 2025Finished Water Tap Tp 12 (Well 16d)ground waterLithium26.8 ppb9 ppb
Feb 19, 2025Finished Water Tap Tp 14 (Well 18d)ground waterLithium24.9 ppb9 ppb
Feb 19, 2025Finished Water Tap Tp 19 (Wells 17d & 20d-21d & 25d & 27d-28d)ground waterLithium25.5 ppb9 ppb
Feb 20, 2025Finished Water Tap Tp 9 (Wells 11d & 23d)ground waterLithium43.4 ppb9 ppb
Feb 20, 2025Finished Water Tap Tp 11 (Well 15d)ground waterLithium41.4 ppb9 ppb
Feb 25, 2025Finished Water Tap TP21 (Well 30d)ground waterLithium54.3 ppb9 ppb
Feb 26, 2025Finished Water Tap Tp 8 (Wells 10d & 22d)ground waterLithium43.2 ppb9 ppb
Feb 26, 2025Finished Water Tap Tp 10 (Well 12d)ground waterLithium34.7 ppb9 ppb
Feb 26, 2025Finished Water Tap Tp 20 (Well 29d)ground waterLithium54.7 ppb9 ppb
Aug 12, 2025Finished Water Tap Tp 1 (Wells 6d-8d & 24d & 101-105)ground waterLithium40.1 ppb9 ppb
Aug 12, 2025Finished Water Tap Tp 6 (Well 5d)ground waterLithium43.4 ppb9 ppb
Aug 12, 2025Finished Water Tap Tp 8 (Wells 10d & 22d)ground waterLithium39.1 ppb9 ppb
Aug 12, 2025Finished Water Tap Tp 9 (Wells 11d & 23d)ground waterLithium35.7 ppb9 ppb
Aug 12, 2025Finished Water Tap Tp 14 (Well 18d)ground waterLithium39.2 ppb9 ppb
Aug 12, 2025Finished Water Tap Tp 19 (Wells 17d & 20d-21d & 25d & 27d-28d)ground waterLithium23.7 ppb9 ppb
Aug 12, 2025Finished Water Tap Tp 20 (Well 29d)ground waterLithium51.2 ppb9 ppb
Aug 13, 2025Finished Water Tap Tp 10 (Well 12d)ground waterLithium34.8 ppb9 ppb
Aug 13, 2025Finished Water Tap Tp 12 (Well 16d)ground waterLithium29.5 ppb9 ppb
Aug 13, 2025Finished Water Tap TP21 (Well 30d)ground waterLithium39.9 ppb9 ppb
Aug 14, 2025Finished Water Tap Tp 11 (Well 15d)ground waterLithium33.4 ppb9 ppb

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 22 of 22 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 22 of 22 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 22 of 22 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Jun 30, 2026, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 6.5 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. The action level has been reached in 3 of the 24 periods on record.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017: 7.7 ppbJan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018: 8.2 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021: 7.2 ppbJul 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022: 4.4 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Jun 30, 2023: 4.2 ppbJul 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023: 5.5 ppbJan 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024: 4.7 ppbJul 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024: 7.8 ppbJan 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2025: 8.7 ppbJan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025: 0 ppbJul 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025: 9.0 ppbJan 1, 2026 – Jun 30, 2026: 6.5 ppbDec 31, 2017Jun 30, 20266.5 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Jun 30, 2026, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 6.5 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb; 3 of the 24 monitoring periods on record reached the action level. The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2026 – Jun 30, 2026Lead6.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead9.0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2025Lead8.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024Lead7.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024Lead4.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023Lead5.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2023 – Jun 30, 2023Lead4.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022Lead4.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead7.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead8.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017Lead7.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 24 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2026 – Jun 30, 2026Lead6.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead9.0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2025Lead8.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024Lead7.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024Lead4.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023Lead5.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2023 – Jun 30, 2023Lead4.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022Lead4.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead7.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead8.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017Lead7.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead8.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011Lead8.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead7.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead15 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2002Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Jun 30, 1997Lead13 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead23 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead22 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 11 violations since Sep 3, 2016. 1 is health-based, meaning a contaminant or treatment rule was not met. The other 10 concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 11 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 1 health-based (a contaminant above its maximum contaminant level, a disinfectant above its maximum residual level, or a required treatment technique not met), 10 for monitoring or reporting.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Oct 17, 2024TT · health-basedLead and Copper Rule RevisionsLSL Inventory1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action
Oct 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024MRCombined Radium (-226 and -228)Monitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025MRTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (Pcb)Monitoring, Regular4 records at 4 facilitiesArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Oct 1, 2017MRLead and Copper RuleFollow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/R1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Oct 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017MRCombined Radium (-226 and -228)Monitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017MRNitrateMonitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesResolved · 4 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Oct 24, 2025 (reason not recorded); 4 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified for lead reduction

3 of this utility's 24 lead monitoring periods on record reached the 15 ppb action level (most recent 90th percentile 6.5 ppb).

NSF/ANSI 53 with a lead-reduction claim, or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. Lead comes from plumbing, so a point-of-use filter at the kitchen tap is the relevant type.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 54.7 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records