Tap Water Lookup

EPA system NC0467035 · North Carolina

Onslow Wtr and Sewer Authority: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID NC0467035; community water system; North Carolina; source: groundwater; serves 156,755 people via 56,024 connections; status: active

In focus156,755people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 29.5 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.29.5 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled February 2023–August 2023. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Onslow Wtr and Sewer Authority is a local-government-owned community water system in North Carolina serving about 156,755 people, matched to 12 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
8 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
8 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
29.5 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
7 of 10 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
0 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
250 results, 5 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
0 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
1
health-based violation since Sep 3, 2016
7 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (10 of 10 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 10 of 10 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 1. Lithium reached 29.5 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between February 2023 and February 2024, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 250 samples from 5 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 1 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Lithium reached 29.5 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
29.5 ppb
at or above the health reference level
Show the 29 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium10729.5 ppb26 ppb (2 of 2)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelFebruary 2023 – August 2023
11Cl-PF3OUdS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
4:2 FTS80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
6:2 FTS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
8:2 FTS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
9Cl-PF3ONS80< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
ADONA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
HFPO-DA (GenX)80< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
NEtFOSAA100< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – February 2024
NFDHA80< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
NMeFOSAA100< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – February 2024
PFBA80< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
PFBS80< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
PFDA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
PFDoA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
PFEESA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
PFHpA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
PFHpS80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
PFHxA80< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
PFHxS80< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
PFMBA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
PFMPA80< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
PFNA80< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
PFOA80< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
PFOS80< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
PFPeA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
PFPeS80< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
PFTA100< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – February 2024
PFTrDA100< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – February 2024
PFUnA80< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (7 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Feb 7, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Well #2ground waterLithium9 ppb9 ppb
Feb 7, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Well #13ground waterLithium11.5 ppb9 ppb
Feb 7, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Dixon WTPground waterLithium22.5 ppb9 ppb
Aug 1, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Well #2ground waterLithium10.8 ppb9 ppb
Aug 1, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Well #5ground waterLithium9.4 ppb9 ppb
Aug 1, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Well #13ground waterLithium14.8 ppb9 ppb
Aug 1, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Dixon WTPground waterLithium29.5 ppb9 ppb

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 10 of 10 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: yes at 9 of 10 sampling events, no at 1 of 10 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 10 of 10 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 0 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. The action level has been reached in 1 of the 26 periods on record.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010: 4 ppbJul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010: 0 ppbJan 1, 2011 – Jun 30, 2011: 0 ppbJul 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011: 4.7 ppbJan 1, 2012 – Jun 30, 2012: 3.5 ppbJul 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2012: 4.1 ppbJan 1, 2013 – Jun 30, 2013: 3.6 ppbJul 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013: 3.2 ppbJan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016: 0 ppbJan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019: 0 ppbJan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022: 0 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025: 0 ppbJun 30, 2010Dec 31, 20250 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 0 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb; 1 of the 26 monitoring periods on record reached the action level. The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013Lead3.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Jun 30, 2013Lead3.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2012Lead4.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Jun 30, 2012Lead3.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011Lead4.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Jun 30, 2011Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 26 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013Lead3.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Jun 30, 2013Lead3.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2012Lead4.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Jun 30, 2012Lead3.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011Lead4.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Jun 30, 2011Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2009 – Jun 30, 2009Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Jun 30, 2008Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Jun 30, 2007Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Jun 30, 2006Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Jun 30, 2005Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead16 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 7 violations since Sep 3, 2016. 1 is health-based, meaning a contaminant or treatment rule was not met. The other 6 concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 7 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 1 health-based (a contaminant above its maximum contaminant level, a disinfectant above its maximum residual level, or a required treatment technique not met), 4 for monitoring or reporting, 2 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements).

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Oct 17, 2024TT · health-basedLead and Copper Rule RevisionsLSL Inventory1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Oct 28, 2024OtherPublic NoticePublic Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action
Oct 17, 2024RPTLead and Copper Rule RevisionsLSL Reporting1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Dec 11, 2023RPTRevised Total Coliform RuleReport Sample Result/Fail Monitor (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 5 enforcement actions
Jul 11, 2023RPTRevised Total Coliform RuleReport Sample Result/Fail Monitor (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 5 enforcement actions
Jun 28, 2020OtherPublic NoticePublic Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action
Jun 11, 2019RPTRevised Total Coliform RuleReport Sample Result/Fail Monitor (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 5 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: May 12, 2026 (reason not recorded); 37 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified for lead reduction

1 of this utility's 26 lead monitoring periods on record reached the 15 ppb action level (most recent 90th percentile 0 ppb).

NSF/ANSI 53 with a lead-reduction claim, or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. Lead comes from plumbing, so a point-of-use filter at the kitchen tap is the relevant type.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 29.5 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records