Tap Water Lookup

EPA system NM3509623 · New Mexico

Rio Rancho Water & Ww Services: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID NM3509623; community water system; New Mexico; source: purchased surface water; serves 107,350 people via 37,760 connections; status: active

In focus107,350people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 467 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.467 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled January 2025–October 2025. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Rio Rancho Water & Ww Services is a local-government-owned community water system in New Mexico serving about 107,350 people, matched to 4 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
14 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
14 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
467 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
14 of 14 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
0 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
420 results, 7 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
2 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
1
health-based violation since Sep 3, 2016
15 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (16 of 16 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 16 of 16 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 1. Lithium reached 467 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between January 2025 and October 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 420 samples from 7 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 1 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Lithium reached 467 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
467 ppb
at or above the health reference level
Show the 29 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium1414467 ppb422 ppb (2 of 2)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
11Cl-PF3OUdS140< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
4:2 FTS140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
6:2 FTS140< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
8:2 FTS140< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
9Cl-PF3ONS140< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
ADONA140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
HFPO-DA (GenX)140< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
NEtFOSAA140< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
NFDHA140< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
NMeFOSAA140< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFBA140< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFBS140< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFDA140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFDoA140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFEESA140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFHpA140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFHpS140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFHxA140< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFHxS140< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFMBA140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFMPA140< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFNA140< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFOA140< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFOS140< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFPeA140< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFPeS140< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFTA140< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFTrDA140< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFUnA140< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (14 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Jan 14, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Well # 3 Treatment Unitground waterLithium85.8 ppb9 ppb
Jan 14, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Well #12 Treatment Unitground waterLithium376 ppb9 ppb
Jan 14, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Well #16 Treatment Unitground waterLithium262 ppb9 ppb
Jan 14, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Well #10a Treatment Unitground waterLithium393 ppb9 ppb
Jan 14, 2025Entry Point to Dist.System Well # 15 Treatment Unit - SP096230251ground waterLithium271 ppb9 ppb
Jul 16, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Well #6a Treatment Unitground waterLithium160 ppb9 ppb
Jul 16, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Well # 3 Treatment Unitground waterLithium85.8 ppb9 ppb
Jul 16, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Well #12 Treatment Unitground waterLithium467 ppb9 ppb
Jul 16, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Well #16 Treatment Unitground waterLithium281 ppb9 ppb
Jul 16, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Well #10a Treatment Unitground waterLithium364 ppb9 ppb
Jul 16, 2025Entry Point to Dist.System Well # 15 Treatment Unit - SP096230251ground waterLithium287 ppb9 ppb
Aug 19, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Well #17 Treatment Unitground waterLithium82 ppb9 ppb
Oct 7, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Well #6a Treatment Unitground waterLithium118 ppb9 ppb
Oct 7, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Well #17 Treatment Unitground waterLithium78.1 ppb9 ppb

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 16 of 16 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 16 of 16 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 16 of 16 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 2 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 16 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001: 0 ppbJan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004: 0 ppbJan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007: 0 ppbJan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010: 0 ppbJan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013: 3.8 ppbJan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014: 2 ppbJan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016: 2 ppbJan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017: 1 ppbJan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019: 1 ppbJan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2020: 1 ppbJan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022: 1 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025: 2 ppbDec 31, 2001Dec 31, 20252 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 2 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (16 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2020Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead3.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 16 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2020Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead3.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1994 – Dec 31, 1994Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Jun 30, 1993Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead14 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 15 violations since Sep 3, 2016. 1 is health-based, meaning a contaminant or treatment rule was not met. The other 14 concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices. 1 is still open.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 15 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 1 health-based (a contaminant above its maximum contaminant level, a disinfectant above its maximum residual level, or a required treatment technique not met), 14 for monitoring or reporting; 1 is not yet resolved.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Mar 23, 2026TT · health-basedGroundwater RuleFailure To Address Deficiency1 recordUnaddressed
Jan 1, 2018 – Jan 31, 2018MRTthmMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2018 – Jan 31, 2018MRTotal Haloacetic Acids (Haa5)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Jun 1, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
May 1, 2017 – May 31, 2017MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Apr 1, 2017 – Apr 30, 2017MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Apr 1, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017MRChlorineMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Mar 1, 2017 – Mar 31, 2017MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Feb 1, 2017 – Feb 28, 2017MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2017 – Mar 31, 2017MRChlorineMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2017 – Jan 31, 2017MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Dec 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Nov 1, 2016 – Nov 30, 2016MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Oct 1, 2016 – Oct 31, 2016MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Oct 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016MRChlorineMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Mar 30, 2022 (sanitary survey); 1 visit since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 467 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records