Tap Water Lookup

EPA system NY3304334 · New York

Syracuse City: No PFAS or lithium found in EPA testing

System ID NY3304334; community water system; New York; source: surface water; serves 192,000 people via 45,503 connections; status: active

In focus192,000people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLead, 90th percentile at customer taps
Lead, 90th percentile at customer taps: 12 ppb; action level 15 ppb. 90th percentile for the latest monitoring period.12 ppbaction level: 15 ppb

90th percentile for the latest monitoring period; sampled Dec 31, 2025. Source: EPA SDWIS/ECHO.

Syracuse City is a local-government-owned community water system in New York serving about 192,000 people, matched to 19 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
4 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
4 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 9 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
4 samples, none above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · not detected above the reporting level
0 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
120 results, 1 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
12 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
16
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
18 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (4 of 4 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 4 of 4 sampling events

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found none of them at levels its laboratories can measure.

Between September 2024 and June 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 120 samples from 1 sampling location for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). None were found above their minimum reporting levels.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
No contaminant was detected above its reporting level.
Show the 30 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Lithiumnot detected · reporting level 9 ppb
< 9 ppb
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
11Cl-PF3OUdS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
4:2 FTS40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
6:2 FTS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
8:2 FTS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
9Cl-PF3ONS40< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
ADONA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
HFPO-DA (GenX)40< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
Lithium40< 9 ppb10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
NEtFOSAA40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
NFDHA40< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
NMeFOSAA40< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
PFBA40< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
PFBS40< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
PFDA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
PFDoA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
PFEESA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
PFHpA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
PFHpS40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
PFHxA40< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
PFHxS40< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
PFMBA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
PFMPA40< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
PFNA40< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
PFOA40< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
PFOS40< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
PFPeA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
PFPeS40< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
PFTA40< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
PFTrDA40< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
PFUnA40< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2024 – June 2025
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 4 of 4 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 4 of 4 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 4 of 4 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 12 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. The action level has been reached in 17 of the 28 periods on record.

Action level 15 ppb015Jul 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007: 13 ppbJan 1, 2008 – Jun 30, 2008: 14 ppbJan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009: 10.8 ppbJan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012: 14 ppbJan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015: 11.2 ppbJan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018: 9.3 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021: 15.1 ppbJul 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023: 15 ppbJan 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024: 70 ppbJul 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024: 12 ppbJan 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2025: 9 ppbJul 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025: 12 ppbDec 31, 2007Dec 31, 202512 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 12 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb; 17 of the 28 monitoring periods on record reached the action level (3 within the last 10 years). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jul 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2025Lead9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024Lead70 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023Lead15 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead15.1 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018Lead9.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015Lead11.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead14 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009Lead10.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Jun 30, 2008Lead14 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007Lead13 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 28 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jul 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2025Lead9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024Lead70 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023Lead15 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead15.1 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018Lead9.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015Lead11.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead14 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009Lead10.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Jun 30, 2008Lead14 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007Lead13 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Jun 30, 2007Lead10.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006Lead13.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Jun 30, 2006Lead16 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005Lead15.8 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Jun 30, 2005Lead22 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004Lead20 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Jun 30, 2004Lead19 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003Lead17 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Jun 30, 2003Lead25 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead23 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead15 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead28 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead20 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000Lead22 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead40 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead50 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 18 violations since Sep 3, 2016. 16 are health-based, meaning a contaminant or treatment rule was not met. The other 2 concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices. 2 are still open.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 18 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 16 health-based (a contaminant above its maximum contaminant level, a disinfectant above its maximum residual level, or a required treatment technique not met), 1 for monitoring or reporting, 1 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements); 2 are not yet resolved.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Mar 30, 2025TT · health-basedLong Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleFailure to Filter (SWTR)1 recordUnaddressed
Mar 1, 2025 – Mar 31, 2025TT · health-basedSurface Water Treatment RuleTreatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)1 recordArchived
Jun 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024TT · health-basedLong Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleTreatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2024 – Jan 31, 2024TT · health-basedSurface Water Treatment RuleTreatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)2 recordsResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2025TT · health-basedLong Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleTreatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)1 recordArchived
Apr 1, 2023 – Apr 30, 2023TT · health-basedSurface Water Treatment RuleTreatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Mar 1, 2023 – Mar 31, 2023TT · health-basedSurface Water Treatment RuleTreatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Dec 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022TT · health-basedSurface Water Treatment RuleTreatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Nov 1, 2021 – Nov 30, 2021TT · health-basedSurface Water Treatment RuleTreatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Dec 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020TT · health-basedSurface Water Treatment RuleTreatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Nov 1, 2020 – Nov 30, 2020TT · health-basedSurface Water Treatment RuleTreatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)2 recordsResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Mar 1, 2019 – Mar 31, 2019TT · health-basedSurface Water Treatment RuleTreatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Dec 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018TT · health-basedSurface Water Treatment RuleTreatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2017 – Jan 31, 2017TT · health-basedSurface Water Treatment RuleTreatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Mar 30, 2026OtherRevised Total Coliform RuleSample Siting Plan Errors (RTCR)1 recordUnaddressed
Sep 29, 2024 – Sep 30, 2024MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitor Coliform Turbidity Trigger (RTCR)1 recordArchived

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Dec 9, 2025 (sanitary survey); 26 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified for lead reduction

17 of this utility's 28 lead monitoring periods on record reached the 15 ppb action level (most recent 90th percentile 12 ppb).

NSF/ANSI 53 with a lead-reduction claim, or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. Lead comes from plumbing, so a point-of-use filter at the kitchen tap is the relevant type.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records