Tap Water Lookup

EPA system PA5650032 · Pennsylvania

Mawc Sweeney Plant: No PFAS or lithium found in EPA testing

System ID PA5650032; community water system; Pennsylvania; source: surface water; serves 143,000 people via 60,233 connections; status: active

In focus143,000people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLead, 90th percentile at customer taps
Lead, 90th percentile at customer taps: 3.5 ppb; action level 15 ppb. 90th percentile for the latest monitoring period.3.5 ppbaction level: 15 ppb

90th percentile for the latest monitoring period; sampled Sep 30, 2025. Source: EPA SDWIS/ECHO.

Mawc Sweeney Plant is a local-government-owned community water system in Pennsylvania serving about 143,000 people, matched to 43 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
4 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
4 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 9 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
4 samples, none above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · not detected above the reporting level
0 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
120 results, 1 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
3.5 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Sep 30, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
2
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
14 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (4 of 4 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 4 of 4 sampling events

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found none of them at levels its laboratories can measure.

Between April 2023 and January 2024, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 120 samples from 1 sampling location for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). None were found above their minimum reporting levels.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
No contaminant was detected above its reporting level.
Show the 30 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Lithiumnot detected · reporting level 9 ppb
< 9 ppb
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
11Cl-PF3OUdS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
4:2 FTS40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
6:2 FTS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
8:2 FTS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
9Cl-PF3ONS40< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
ADONA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
HFPO-DA (GenX)40< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
Lithium40< 9 ppb10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
NEtFOSAA40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
NFDHA40< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
NMeFOSAA40< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFBA40< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFBS40< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFDA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFDoA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFEESA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFHpA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFHpS40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFHxA40< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFHxS40< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFMBA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFMPA40< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFNA40< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFOA40< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFOS40< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFPeA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFPeS40< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFTA40< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFTrDA40< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFUnA40< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 4 of 4 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 4 of 4 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 4 of 4 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Sep 30, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 3.5 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. The action level has been reached in 1 of the 15 periods on record.

Action level 15 ppb015Jul 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997: 7.1 ppbJan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999: 5.8 ppbJan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001: 11.2 ppbJan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004: 2 ppbJan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007: 1 ppbJan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010: 8 ppbJun 1, 2013 – Sep 30, 2013: 1.9 ppbJun 1, 2016 – Sep 30, 2016: 0 ppbJun 1, 2018 – Sep 30, 2018: 0 ppbJun 1, 2019 – Sep 30, 2019: 0 ppbJun 1, 2022 – Sep 30, 2022: 0 ppbJun 1, 2025 – Sep 30, 2025: 3.5 ppbDec 31, 1997Sep 30, 20253.5 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Sep 30, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 3.5 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb; 1 of the 15 monitoring periods on record reached the action level. The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jun 1, 2025 – Sep 30, 2025Lead3.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2022 – Sep 30, 2022Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2019 – Sep 30, 2019Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2018 – Sep 30, 2018Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2016 – Sep 30, 2016Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2013 – Sep 30, 2013Lead1.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead11.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead5.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997Lead7.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 15 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jun 1, 2025 – Sep 30, 2025Lead3.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2022 – Sep 30, 2022Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2019 – Sep 30, 2019Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2018 – Sep 30, 2018Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2016 – Sep 30, 2016Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2013 – Sep 30, 2013Lead1.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead11.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead5.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997Lead7.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Jun 30, 1997Lead4.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead8.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead25.3 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 14 violations since Sep 3, 2016. 2 are health-based, meaning a contaminant or treatment rule was not met. The other 12 concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 14 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 2 health-based (a contaminant above its maximum contaminant level, a disinfectant above its maximum residual level, or a required treatment technique not met), 10 for monitoring or reporting, 2 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements).

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Jan 1, 2019 – Mar 31, 2019TT · health-basedCarbon, TotalTreatment Technique Precursor Removal1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Oct 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018TT · health-basedCarbon, TotalTreatment Technique Precursor Removal1 recordResolved · 5 enforcement actions
Feb 1, 2025 – Feb 28, 2025MRSurface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Filter)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Jun 1, 2023 – Aug 31, 2023MRCarbon, TotalMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Nov 1, 2022 – Jan 31, 2023MRCarbon, TotalMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Oct 1, 2022OtherConsumer Confidence RuleConsumer Confidence Report Inadequate Reporting1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action
Sep 1, 2020 – Sep 30, 2020MRInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR)1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2019 – Sep 30, 2019MRTthmMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action
Jul 1, 2019 – Sep 30, 2019MRTotal Haloacetic Acids (Haa5)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action
Feb 10, 2019OtherPublic NoticePublic Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2018 – Sep 30, 2018MRCarbon, TotalMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action
Jun 1, 2018RPTRevised Total Coliform RuleReport Sample Result/Fail Monitor (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Oct 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016MRCarbon, TotalMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Oct 1, 2016 – Oct 31, 2016MRSurface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Filter)1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Oct 9, 2024 (sanitary survey); 1 visit since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified for lead reduction

1 of this utility's 15 lead monitoring periods on record reached the 15 ppb action level (most recent 90th percentile 3.5 ppb).

NSF/ANSI 53 with a lead-reduction claim, or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. Lead comes from plumbing, so a point-of-use filter at the kitchen tap is the relevant type.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records