Tap Water Lookup

EPA system AL0000888 · Alabama

Madison County Water Department: 3 PFAS found; PFOS averaged 3.5 ppt, below the 4.0 ppt limit

System ID AL0000888; community water system; Alabama; source: purchased surface water; serves 119,100 people via 39,700 connections; status: active

In focus119,100people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referencePFOS
PFOS: 3.5 ppt; MCL 4.0 ppt. highest complete sampling-location average.3.5 pptMCL: 4.0 ppt

highest complete sampling-location average; sampled December 2024–September 2025. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Madison County Water Department is a local-government-owned community water system in Alabama serving about 119,100 people, matched to 15 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
10 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
3.5 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
4 of 4 results at the highest location; highest single sample 5.0 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · below the MCL
< 9 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
10 samples, none above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · not detected above the reporting level
3 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
300 results, 4 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
2.4 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2023
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
29 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (10 of 10 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 10 of 10 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • PFOS EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOS at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOS exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFBS EPA's 2021 PFBS toxicity assessment cites thyroid, kidney and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source
  • PFBA EPA's 2022 IRIS assessment for PFBA cites thyroid, liver and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 3. PFOS averaged 3.5 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. That PFOS result is higher than 91% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it.

Between December 2024 and September 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 300 samples from 4 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 3 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOS was 3.5 ppt, below the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 5.0 ppt).

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
PFOScomplete-set average
3.5 ppt
below the MCL
PFBShighest single sample
4.7 ppt
below the health-based water concentration
PFBAhighest single sample
8.3 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 27 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Lithiumnot detected · reporting level 9 ppb
< 9 ppb
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
PFOS1035.0 ppt3.5 ppt (4 of 4)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the MCLDecember 2024 – September 2025
PFBS1044.7 ppt4.2 ppt (4 of 4)2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplebelow the health-based water concentrationDecember 2024 – September 2025
PFBA1028.3 ppt3.3 ppt (4 of 4)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
11Cl-PF3OUdS100< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
4:2 FTS100< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
6:2 FTS100< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
8:2 FTS100< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
9Cl-PF3ONS100< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
ADONA100< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
HFPO-DA (GenX)100< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
Lithium100< 9 ppb10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
NEtFOSAA100< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
NFDHA100< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
NMeFOSAA100< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
PFDA100< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
PFDoA100< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
PFEESA100< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
PFHpA100< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
PFHpS100< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
PFHxA100< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
PFHxS100< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
PFMBA100< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
PFMPA100< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
PFNA100< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
PFOA100< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
PFPeA100< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
PFPeS100< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
PFTA100< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
PFTrDA100< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
PFUnA100< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2024 – September 2025
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (9 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Dec 19, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Huntsville Intertiesurface waterPFBS3.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 19, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Huntsville Intertiesurface waterPFOS4.9 ppt4.0 ppt
Mar 20, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Huntsville Intertiesurface waterPFBS4.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 3, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Huntsville Intertiesurface waterPFBA8.3 ppt5.0 ppt
Jun 3, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Huntsville Intertiesurface waterPFBS4.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 3, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Huntsville Intertiesurface waterPFOS4.1 ppt4.0 ppt
Sep 8, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Huntsville Intertiesurface waterPFBA5.0 ppt5.0 ppt
Sep 8, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Huntsville Intertiesurface waterPFBS4.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 8, 2025Entry Point to Dist. System Huntsville Intertiesurface waterPFOS5.0 ppt4.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 10 of 10 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: not known at 6 of 10 sampling events, no at 4 of 10 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 10 of 10 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2023, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 2.4 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 30 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010: 5 ppbJan 1, 2011 – Jun 30, 2011: 5 ppbJan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2012: 5 ppbJan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013: 5 ppbJan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2014: 5 ppbJan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2015: 5 ppbJan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016: 5 ppbJan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017: 5 ppbJan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018: 0 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019: 2.9 ppbJan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020: 3.2 ppbJan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2023: 2.4 ppbDec 31, 2010Dec 31, 20232.4 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2023, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 2.4 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (30 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2023Lead2.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020Lead3.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019Lead2.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2015Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2014Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2012Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Jun 30, 2011Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 30 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2023Lead2.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020Lead3.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019Lead2.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2015Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2014Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2012Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Jun 30, 2011Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006Lead0.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1998Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Jun 30, 1995Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1994 – Dec 31, 1994Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1994 – Dec 31, 1994Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Jun 30, 1993Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 30, 1992Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 29 violations since Sep 3, 2016. None is health-based. All concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices, not the water itself.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 29 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 29 for monitoring or reporting, none health-based.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MREndrinMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MRBhc-GammaMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MRMethoxychlorMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MRDalaponMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MRDiquatMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MRGlyphosateMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MRDi(2-Ethylhexyl) AdipateMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MROxamylMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MRSimazineMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MRDi(2-Ethylhexyl) PhthalateMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MRPicloramMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MRHexachlorocyclopentadieneMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MRCarbofuranMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MRLassoMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MRHeptachlor EpoxideMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MRHexachlorobenzeneMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MRBenzo(A)pyreneMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MRPentachlorophenolMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MR1,2-Dibromo-3-ChloropropaneMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MREthylene DibromideMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MRChlordaneMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MRToxapheneMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MRDinosebMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MR2,4-DMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MRHeptachlorMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Show the remaining 4 violation records
Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MRTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (Pcb)Monitoring, Regular1 recordResolved
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MRAtrazineMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MR2,4,5-TpMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved
Jan 11, 2023 – Apr 27, 2023MREndothallMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Mar 12, 2025 (sanitary survey); 4 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 3 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records