Tap Water Lookup

EPA system AZ0411009 · Arizona

Arizona Water Co - Pinal Valley: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID AZ0411009; community water system; Arizona; source: groundwater; serves 134,432 people via 38,340 connections; status: active

In focus134,432people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 353 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.353 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled August 2024–February 2025. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Arizona Water Co - Pinal Valley is a privately owned community water system in Arizona serving about 134,432 people, matched to 7 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
20 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
20 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
353 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
20 of 20 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
6 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
600 results, 10 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
0 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
3 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (19 of 19 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 19 of 20 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
  • PFHxS EPA's 2024 rule cites health effects assessments associating PFHxS with thyroid, liver and immune effects. EPA source
  • PFBS EPA's 2021 PFBS toxicity assessment cites thyroid, kidney and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source
  • PFHxA EPA's 2023 IRIS assessment for PFHxA cites developmental, liver and blood effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 7. Lithium reached 353 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between August 2024 and February 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 600 samples from 10 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 7 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Lithium reached 353 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
353 ppb
at or above the health reference level
PFPeAhighest single sample
20.8 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFHpAhighest single sample
9.4 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFHxScomplete-set average
5.9 ppt
below the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)
PFBShighest single sample
91.1 ppt
below the health-based water concentration
PFHxAhighest single sample
18.6 ppt
below the screening level
PFBAhighest single sample
19.9 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 23 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium2020353 ppb329 ppb (2 of 2)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelAugust 2024 – February 2025
PFPeA20520.8 ppt20.1 ppt (2 of 2)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueAugust 2024 – February 2025
PFHpA2049.4 ppt8.6 ppt (2 of 2)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueAugust 2024 – February 2025
PFHxS2046.1 ppt5.9 ppt (2 of 2)10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)August 2024 – February 2025
PFBS20691.1 ppt88.3 ppt (2 of 2)2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplebelow the health-based water concentrationAugust 2024 – February 2025
PFHxA20518.6 ppt17.6 ppt (2 of 2)3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelAugust 2024 – February 2025
PFBA20419.9 ppt19.3 ppt (2 of 2)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelAugust 2024 – February 2025
11Cl-PF3OUdS200< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – February 2025
4:2 FTS200< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – February 2025
6:2 FTS200< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – February 2025
8:2 FTS200< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – February 2025
9Cl-PF3ONS200< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – February 2025
ADONA200< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – February 2025
HFPO-DA (GenX)200< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – February 2025
NEtFOSAA200< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – February 2025
NFDHA200< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – February 2025
NMeFOSAA200< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – February 2025
PFDA200< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – February 2025
PFDoA200< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – February 2025
PFEESA200< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – February 2025
PFHpS200< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – February 2025
PFMBA200< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – February 2025
PFMPA200< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – February 2025
PFNA200< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – February 2025
PFOA200< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – February 2025
PFOS200< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – February 2025
PFPeS200< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – February 2025
PFTA200< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – February 2025
PFTrDA200< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – February 2025
PFUnA200< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – February 2025
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (48 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Aug 13, 2024EPDS 001 Epds 001ground waterLithium269 ppb9 ppb
Aug 13, 2024EPDS 006 Epds 006ground waterPFBS8.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 13, 2024EPDS 006 Epds 006ground waterLithium304 ppb9 ppb
Aug 13, 2024EPDS 008 Epds 008ground waterLithium52.1 ppb9 ppb
Aug 13, 2024EPDS 011 Epds 011ground waterLithium109 ppb9 ppb
Aug 13, 2024EPDS 012 Epds 012ground waterLithium302 ppb9 ppb
Aug 13, 2024EPDS 014 Epds 014ground waterLithium287 ppb9 ppb
Aug 13, 2024EPDS 017 Epds 017ground waterPFBA19.2 ppt5.0 ppt
Aug 13, 2024EPDS 017 Epds 017ground waterPFBS86.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 13, 2024EPDS 017 Epds 017ground waterPFHpA7.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 13, 2024EPDS 017 Epds 017ground waterPFHxA16.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 13, 2024EPDS 017 Epds 017ground waterPFHxS5.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 13, 2024EPDS 017 Epds 017ground waterPFPeA18.8 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 13, 2024EPDS 017 Epds 017ground waterLithium213 ppb9 ppb
Aug 13, 2024EPDS 018 Epds 018ground waterPFBA19.9 ppt5.0 ppt
Aug 13, 2024EPDS 018 Epds 018ground waterPFBS91.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 13, 2024EPDS 018 Epds 018ground waterPFHpA8.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 13, 2024EPDS 018 Epds 018ground waterPFHxA17.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 13, 2024EPDS 018 Epds 018ground waterPFHxS5.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 13, 2024EPDS 018 Epds 018ground waterPFPeA19.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 13, 2024EPDS 018 Epds 018ground waterLithium195 ppb9 ppb
Aug 13, 2024EPDS 019 Epds 019ground waterLithium185 ppb9 ppb
Aug 13, 2024EPDS 021 Epds 021ground waterLithium262 ppb9 ppb
Feb 12, 2025EPDS 001 Epds 001ground waterLithium347 ppb9 ppb
Feb 12, 2025EPDS 006 Epds 006ground waterPFBS18.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 12, 2025EPDS 006 Epds 006ground waterPFHxA3.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 12, 2025EPDS 006 Epds 006ground waterPFPeA4.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 12, 2025EPDS 006 Epds 006ground waterLithium353 ppb9 ppb
Feb 12, 2025EPDS 008 Epds 008ground waterLithium38.8 ppb9 ppb
Feb 12, 2025EPDS 011 Epds 011ground waterLithium114 ppb9 ppb
Feb 12, 2025EPDS 012 Epds 012ground waterLithium120 ppb9 ppb
Feb 12, 2025EPDS 014 Epds 014ground waterLithium286 ppb9 ppb
Feb 12, 2025EPDS 017 Epds 017ground waterPFBA19.2 ppt5.0 ppt
Feb 12, 2025EPDS 017 Epds 017ground waterPFBS86.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 12, 2025EPDS 017 Epds 017ground waterPFHpA9.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 12, 2025EPDS 017 Epds 017ground waterPFHxA18.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 12, 2025EPDS 017 Epds 017ground waterPFHxS6.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 12, 2025EPDS 017 Epds 017ground waterPFPeA20.8 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 12, 2025EPDS 017 Epds 017ground waterLithium216 ppb9 ppb
Feb 12, 2025EPDS 018 Epds 018ground waterPFBA18.7 ppt5.0 ppt
Feb 12, 2025EPDS 018 Epds 018ground waterPFBS85.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 12, 2025EPDS 018 Epds 018ground waterPFHpA8.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 12, 2025EPDS 018 Epds 018ground waterPFHxA17.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 12, 2025EPDS 018 Epds 018ground waterPFHxS5.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 12, 2025EPDS 018 Epds 018ground waterPFPeA20.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 12, 2025EPDS 018 Epds 018ground waterLithium223 ppb9 ppb
Feb 12, 2025EPDS 019 Epds 019ground waterLithium196 ppb9 ppb
Feb 12, 2025EPDS 021 Epds 021ground waterLithium351 ppb9 ppb

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 19 of 20 sampling events, not known at 1 of 20 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: not known at 19 of 20 sampling events, no at 1 of 20 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 19 of 19 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 0 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 13 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 1993 – Jun 30, 1993: 2 ppbJan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001: 2 ppbJan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004: 0 ppbJan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005: 0 ppbJan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007: 0 ppbJan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008: 0 ppbJan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010: 3 ppbJan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013: 2.7 ppbJan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016: 1 ppbJan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019: 0 ppbJan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024: 0 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025: 0 ppbJun 30, 1993Dec 31, 20250 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 0 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (13 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead2.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Jun 30, 1993Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 13 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead2.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Jun 30, 1993Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead2.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 3 violations since Sep 3, 2016. None is health-based. All concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices, not the water itself.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 3 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 3 for monitoring or reporting, none health-based.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Aug 20, 2025MRE. ColiMonitoring, Source Water (GWR)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Apr 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2025MRArsenicMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Oct 1, 2020RPTRevised Total Coliform RuleReport Sample Result/Fail Monitor (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Dec 17, 2025 (sanitary survey); 4 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 6 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 353 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records