Tap Water Lookup

EPA system CA3710006 · California

Escondido, City of: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID CA3710006; community water system; California; source: surface water; serves 137,044 people via 27,476 connections; status: active

In focus137,044people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 30 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.30 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled February 2023–November 2023. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Escondido, City of is a local-government-owned community water system in California serving about 137,044 people, matched to 5 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
2 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
2 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
30 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
4 of 4 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
0 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
70 results, 1 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
1.1 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2024
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
0 violations in total

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 1. Lithium reached 30 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between February 2023 and November 2023, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 70 samples from 1 sampling location for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 1 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Lithium reached 30 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
30 ppb
at or above the health reference level
Show the 29 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium4430 ppb22.8 ppb (4 of 4)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
11Cl-PF3OUdS20< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – August 2023
4:2 FTS20< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – August 2023
6:2 FTS20< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – August 2023
8:2 FTS20< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – August 2023
9Cl-PF3ONS20< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – August 2023
ADONA20< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – August 2023
HFPO-DA (GenX)20< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – August 2023
NEtFOSAA40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
NFDHA20< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – August 2023
NMeFOSAA40< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFBA20< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – August 2023
PFBS20< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – August 2023
PFDA20< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – August 2023
PFDoA20< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – August 2023
PFEESA20< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – August 2023
PFHpA20< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – August 2023
PFHpS20< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – August 2023
PFHxA20< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – August 2023
PFHxS20< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – August 2023
PFMBA20< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – August 2023
PFMPA20< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – August 2023
PFNA20< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – August 2023
PFOA20< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – August 2023
PFOS20< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – August 2023
PFPeA20< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – August 2023
PFPeS20< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – August 2023
PFTA40< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFTrDA40< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFUnA20< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – August 2023
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (4 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Feb 6, 202345 - Filtration Plant Effluent Water Treatment Plantsurface waterLithium30 ppb9 ppb
May 8, 202345 - Filtration Plant Effluent Water Treatment Plantsurface waterLithium20 ppb9 ppb
Aug 9, 202345 - Filtration Plant Effluent Water Treatment Plantsurface waterLithium25 ppb9 ppb
Nov 8, 202345 - Filtration Plant Effluent Water Treatment Plantsurface waterLithium16 ppb9 ppb

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: no at 4 of 4 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 4 of 4 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 1.1 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 13 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992: 5 ppbJul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992: 3.8 ppbJan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000: 5 ppbJan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004: 5 ppbJan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006: 0 ppbJan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006: 5 ppbJan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011: 0 ppbJan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014: 0 ppbJan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017: 0 ppbJan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018: 0 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021: 0 ppbJan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024: 1.1 ppbDec 31, 1992Dec 31, 20241.1 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 1.1 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (13 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024Lead1.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead3.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 13 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024Lead1.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead3.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead3.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists no drinking-water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.

EPA's SDWIS database lists no drinking water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.

None on file.

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Sep 24, 2021 (sanitary survey); 1 visit since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 30 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records