Tap Water Lookup

EPA system CA3710020 · California

San Diego, City of: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID CA3710020; community water system; California; source: surface water; serves 1,385,379 people via 282,783 connections; status: active

In focus1,385,379people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 65 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.65 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled January 2023–October 2023. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

San Diego, City of is a local-government-owned community water system in California serving about 1,385,379 people, matched to 66 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
16 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
16 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
65 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
15 of 16 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
0 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
480 results, 4 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
0 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2023
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
7 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (4 of 4 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 4 of 16 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 1. Lithium reached 65 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between January 2023 and December 2023, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 480 samples from 4 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 1 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Lithium reached 65 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
65 ppb
at or above the health reference level
Show the 29 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium161565 ppb49.5 ppb (4 of 4)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelJanuary 2023 – October 2023
11Cl-PF3OUdS160< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – October 2023
4:2 FTS160< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – October 2023
6:2 FTS160< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – October 2023
8:2 FTS160< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – October 2023
9Cl-PF3ONS160< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – October 2023
ADONA160< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – October 2023
HFPO-DA (GenX)160< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – October 2023
NEtFOSAA160< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – December 2023
NFDHA160< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – October 2023
NMeFOSAA160< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – December 2023
PFBA160< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – October 2023
PFBS160< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – October 2023
PFDA160< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – October 2023
PFDoA160< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – October 2023
PFEESA160< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – October 2023
PFHpA160< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – October 2023
PFHpS160< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – October 2023
PFHxA160< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – October 2023
PFHxS160< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – October 2023
PFMBA160< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – October 2023
PFMPA160< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – October 2023
PFNA160< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – October 2023
PFOA160< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – October 2023
PFOS160< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – October 2023
PFPeA160< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – October 2023
PFPeS160< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – October 2023
PFTA160< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – December 2023
PFTrDA160< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – December 2023
PFUnA160< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – October 2023
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (15 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Jan 25, 2023CWA TW Connect Sample Point Purchased Water Representative Sample Sitesurface waterLithium26 ppb9 ppb
Jan 25, 2023Miramar FP Combined Effluent Miramar WTPsurface waterLithium60 ppb9 ppb
Jan 25, 2023Alvarado FP Combined Effluent Alvarado WTPsurface waterLithium42 ppb9 ppb
Jan 25, 2023Otay FP Combined Effluent Otay WTPsurface waterLithium60 ppb9 ppb
Apr 13, 2023Miramar FP Combined Effluent Miramar WTPsurface waterLithium65 ppb9 ppb
Apr 13, 2023Alvarado FP Combined Effluent Alvarado WTPsurface waterLithium32 ppb9 ppb
Apr 13, 2023Otay FP Combined Effluent Otay WTPsurface waterLithium40 ppb9 ppb
Jul 20, 2023CWA TW Connect Sample Point Purchased Water Representative Sample Sitesurface waterLithium20 ppb9 ppb
Jul 20, 2023Miramar FP Combined Effluent Miramar WTPsurface waterLithium40 ppb9 ppb
Jul 20, 2023Alvarado FP Combined Effluent Alvarado WTPsurface waterLithium25 ppb9 ppb
Jul 20, 2023Otay FP Combined Effluent Otay WTPsurface waterLithium30 ppb9 ppb
Oct 18, 2023CWA TW Connect Sample Point Purchased Water Representative Sample Sitesurface waterLithium16 ppb9 ppb
Oct 18, 2023Miramar FP Combined Effluent Miramar WTPsurface waterLithium33 ppb9 ppb
Oct 18, 2023Alvarado FP Combined Effluent Alvarado WTPsurface waterLithium32 ppb9 ppb
Oct 18, 2023Otay FP Combined Effluent Otay WTPsurface waterLithium25 ppb9 ppb

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: no at 8 of 16 sampling events, not known at 4 of 16 sampling events, yes at 4 of 16 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 8 of 16 sampling events, not known at 4 of 16 sampling events, yes at 4 of 16 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 4 of 4 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2023, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 0 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 26 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003: 10 ppbJan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004: 0 ppbJan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005: 5 ppbJan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007: 0 ppbJan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010: 9.0 ppbJan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013: 0 ppbJan 1, 2016 – Jun 30, 2016: 0 ppbJan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016: 0 ppbJul 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016: 0 ppbJan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017: 0 ppbJan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2020: 0 ppbJan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2023: 0 ppbDec 31, 2003Dec 31, 20230 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2023, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 0 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (26 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2023Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2020Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Jun 30, 2016Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead9.0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 26 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2023Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2020Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Jun 30, 2016Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead9.0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1998Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1996Lead8.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Dec 31, 1995Lead9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1994 – Dec 31, 1994Lead14 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Dec 31, 1993Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Jun 30, 1993Lead7.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead14 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead8.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead14.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 7 violations since Sep 3, 2016. None is health-based. All concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices, not the water itself.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 7 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 7 for monitoring or reporting, none health-based.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Apr 1, 2020 – Apr 30, 2020MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Mar 1, 2020 – Mar 31, 2020MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Feb 1, 2020 – Feb 29, 2020MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Jan 31, 2020MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Dec 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017MRNitrateMonitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesResolved · 2 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Mar 22, 2024 (sanitary survey); 3 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 65 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records