Tap Water Lookup

EPA system CO0130001 · Colorado

Arvada City of: No PFAS found; lithium up to 9.6 ppb, below the 10 ppb health reference level

System ID CO0130001; community water system; Colorado; source: surface water; serves 171,610 people via 39,327 connections; status: active

In focus171,610people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 9.6 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.9.6 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled March 2023–February 2024. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Arvada City of is a local-government-owned community water system in Colorado serving about 171,610 people, matched to 8 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
8 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
8 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
9.6 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
1 of 8 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · below the health reference level
0 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
240 results, 2 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
3.1 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
4 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (8 of 8 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 8 of 8 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 1. Lithium reached 9.6 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between March 2023 and February 2024, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 240 samples from 2 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 1 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Lithium reached 9.6 ppb in a single sample, below the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
9.6 ppb
below the health reference level
Show the 29 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium819.6 ppb2.4 ppb (4 of 4)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest samplebelow the health reference levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
11Cl-PF3OUdS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
4:2 FTS80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
6:2 FTS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
8:2 FTS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
9Cl-PF3ONS80< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
ADONA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
HFPO-DA (GenX)80< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
NEtFOSAA80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
NFDHA80< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
NMeFOSAA80< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
PFBA80< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
PFBS80< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
PFDA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
PFDoA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
PFEESA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
PFHpA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
PFHpS80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
PFHxA80< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
PFHxS80< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
PFMBA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
PFMPA80< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
PFNA80< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
PFOA80< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
PFOS80< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
PFPeA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
PFPeS80< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
PFTA80< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
PFTrDA80< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
PFUnA80< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2023 – February 2024
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (1 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Feb 26, 2024Arvada Entry Point @ Westwoods Arvada Finished Water @ Westwoodssurface waterLithium9.6 ppb9 ppb

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 8 of 8 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 8 of 8 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 8 of 8 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 3.1 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 19 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999: 3 ppbJan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004: 12 ppbJan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007: 10.3 ppbJan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010: 7 ppbJan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013: 7 ppbJan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016: 3 ppbJan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017: 4.9 ppbJan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018: 4.8 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019: 5 ppbJan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020: 5 ppbJan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021: 3.6 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025: 3.1 ppbDec 31, 1999Dec 31, 20253.1 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 3.1 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (19 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead3.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021Lead3.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead4.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017Lead4.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead10.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 19 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead3.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021Lead3.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead4.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017Lead4.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead10.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Jun 30, 1997Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1996Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995Lead9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1994 – Dec 31, 1994Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Dec 31, 1993Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 4 violations since Sep 3, 2016. None is health-based. All concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices, not the water itself.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 4 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 4 for monitoring or reporting, none health-based.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Jun 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024MRInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
May 1, 2024 – May 31, 2024MRInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Mar 1, 2024 – Mar 31, 2024MRSurface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Filter)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Feb 1, 2024 – Feb 29, 2024MRSurface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Filter)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: May 30, 2024 (sanitary survey); 1 visit since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Test your own tap

EPA results are measured where water enters the distribution system, not at your tap.

A certified-lab mail-in kit reports lead and PFAS from your own faucet; strip tests do not detect PFAS.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records