Tap Water Lookup

EPA system CO0135291 · Colorado

Ft Collins City of: No PFAS or lithium found in EPA testing

System ID CO0135291; community water system; Colorado; source: surface water; serves 179,901 people via 35,866 connections; status: active

In focus179,901people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLead, 90th percentile at customer taps
Lead, 90th percentile at customer taps: 2.8 ppb; action level 15 ppb. 90th percentile for the latest monitoring period.2.8 ppbaction level: 15 ppb

90th percentile for the latest monitoring period; sampled Dec 31, 2025. Source: EPA SDWIS/ECHO.

Ft Collins City of is a local-government-owned community water system in Colorado serving about 179,901 people, matched to 5 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
4 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
4 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 9 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
4 samples, none above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · not detected above the reporting level
0 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
120 results, 1 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
2.8 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
1
health-based violation since Sep 3, 2016
15 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (4 of 4 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 4 of 4 sampling events

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found none of them at levels its laboratories can measure.

Between January 2025 and October 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 120 samples from 1 sampling location for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). None were found above their minimum reporting levels.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
No contaminant was detected above its reporting level.
Show the 30 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Lithiumnot detected · reporting level 9 ppb
< 9 ppb
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
11Cl-PF3OUdS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
4:2 FTS40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
6:2 FTS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
8:2 FTS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
9Cl-PF3ONS40< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
ADONA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
HFPO-DA (GenX)40< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
Lithium40< 9 ppb10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
NEtFOSAA40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
NFDHA40< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
NMeFOSAA40< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFBA40< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFBS40< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFDA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFDoA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFEESA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFHpA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFHpS40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFHxA40< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFHxS40< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFMBA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFMPA40< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFNA40< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFOA40< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFOS40< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFPeA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFPeS40< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFTA40< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFTrDA40< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFUnA40< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 4 of 4 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 4 of 4 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 4 of 4 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 2.8 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 19 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999: 2 ppbJan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004: 2 ppbJan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007: 2.1 ppbJan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010: 2.5 ppbJan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013: 2 ppbJan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016: 2 ppbJan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017: 3.7 ppbJan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018: 5 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019: 2 ppbJan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020: 2.5 ppbJan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021: 2 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025: 2.8 ppbDec 31, 1999Dec 31, 20252.8 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 2.8 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (19 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead2.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020Lead2.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017Lead3.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead2.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead2.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 19 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead2.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020Lead2.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017Lead3.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead2.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead2.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Jun 30, 1997Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1996Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1994 – Dec 31, 1994Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Dec 31, 1993Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 15 violations since Sep 3, 2016. 1 is health-based, meaning a contaminant or treatment rule was not met. The other 14 concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 15 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 1 health-based (a contaminant above its maximum contaminant level, a disinfectant above its maximum residual level, or a required treatment technique not met), 14 for monitoring or reporting.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Dec 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017TT · health-basedInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (2.5 NTU)Single Turbidity Exceed (Enhanced SWTR)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Apr 1, 2026 – Apr 30, 2026MRSurface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Filter)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Mar 1, 2026 – Mar 31, 2026MRChlorine DioxideMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Feb 1, 2026 – Feb 28, 2026MRChlorine DioxideMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2026 – Jan 31, 2026MRChlorine DioxideMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2024 – Jul 31, 2024MRSurface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Filter)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2024 – Jul 31, 2024MRInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Apr 1, 2021 – Jun 30, 2021MRTthmMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Apr 1, 2021 – Jun 30, 2021MRTotal Haloacetic Acids (Haa5)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Dec 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017MRInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
May 1, 2017 – May 31, 2017MRSurface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Filter)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Apr 1, 2017 – Apr 30, 2017MRSurface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Filter)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Apr 1, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017MRChlorineMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Mar 1, 2017 – Mar 31, 2017MRSurface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Filter)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2017 – Mar 31, 2017MRChlorineMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Mar 27, 2026 (sanitary survey); 2 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Test your own tap

EPA results are measured where water enters the distribution system, not at your tap.

A certified-lab mail-in kit reports lead and PFAS from your own faucet; strip tests do not detect PFAS.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records