Tap Water Lookup

EPA system CT1350011 · Connecticut

Aquarion-Stamford: 3 PFAS found; PFOA averaged 2.1 ppt, below the 4.0 ppt limit

System ID CT1350011; community water system; Connecticut; source: surface water; serves 119,214 people via 21,259 connections; status: active

In focus119,214people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referencePFOA
PFOA: 2.1 ppt; MCL 4.0 ppt. highest complete sampling-location average.2.1 pptMCL: 4.0 ppt

highest complete sampling-location average; sampled March 2025–December 2025. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Aquarion-Stamford is a privately owned community water system in Connecticut serving about 119,214 people, matched to 7 ZIP codes.

2.1 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
4 of 4 results at the highest location; highest single sample 4.3 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · below the MCL
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
8 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 9 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
8 samples, none above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · not detected above the reporting level
3 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
240 results, 2 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
0 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
2 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (8 of 8 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 8 of 8 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • PFOA EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOA at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOA exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFHxA EPA's 2023 IRIS assessment for PFHxA cites developmental, liver and blood effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 3. PFOA averaged 2.1 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. That PFOA result is higher than 89% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it.

Between March 2025 and December 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 240 samples from 2 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 3 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOA was 2.1 ppt, below the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 4.3 ppt).

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
PFPeAhighest single sample
3.1 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFOAcomplete-set average
2.1 ppt
below the MCL
PFHxAhighest single sample
3.0 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 27 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Lithiumnot detected · reporting level 9 ppb
< 9 ppb
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
PFPeA813.1 ppt0.8 ppt (4 of 4)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFOA834.3 ppt2.1 ppt (4 of 4)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the MCLMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFHxA813.0 ppt0.8 ppt (4 of 4)3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
11Cl-PF3OUdS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
4:2 FTS80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
6:2 FTS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
8:2 FTS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
9Cl-PF3ONS80< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
ADONA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
HFPO-DA (GenX)80< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
Lithium80< 9 ppb10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
NEtFOSAA80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
NFDHA80< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
NMeFOSAA80< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFBA80< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFBS80< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFDA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFDoA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFEESA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFHpA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFHpS80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFHxS80< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFMBA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFMPA80< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFNA80< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFOS80< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFPeS80< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFTA80< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFTrDA80< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFUnA80< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (5 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Mar 5, 2025Stamford Res FP Tank Effluent Stamford WTP Entry Pointsurface waterPFOA4.2 ppt4.0 ppt
Sep 10, 2025Woodway Rd Meter Pit Interconnection - Aquarion Reg Pipelinesurface waterPFOA4.2 ppt4.0 ppt
Dec 2, 2025Stamford Res FP Tank Effluent Stamford WTP Entry Pointsurface waterPFHxA3.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 2, 2025Stamford Res FP Tank Effluent Stamford WTP Entry Pointsurface waterPFOA4.3 ppt4.0 ppt
Dec 2, 2025Stamford Res FP Tank Effluent Stamford WTP Entry Pointsurface waterPFPeA3.1 ppt3.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 8 of 8 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 8 of 8 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 8 of 8 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 0 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 40 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 2019 – Jun 30, 2019: 0 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019: 0 ppbJul 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019: 1 ppbJan 1, 2020 – Jun 30, 2020: 0 ppbJan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020: 0 ppbJul 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020: 2 ppbJan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021: 2 ppbJan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022: 0 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023: 0 ppbJan 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024: 0 ppbJan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025: 0 ppbJan 1, 2026 – Dec 31, 2026: 0 ppbJun 30, 2019Dec 31, 20260 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 0 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (40 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Jun 30, 2020Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Jun 30, 2019Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 40 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Jun 30, 2020Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Jun 30, 2019Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2015Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2014Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2012Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2006Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001Lead9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1996Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Jun 30, 1995Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1994 – Dec 31, 1994Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1994 – Jun 30, 1994Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2026 – Dec 31, 2026Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 2 violations since Sep 3, 2016. None is health-based. All concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices, not the water itself.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 2 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 1 for monitoring or reporting, 1 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements), none health-based.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Dec 30, 2021MRLead and Copper RuleLead Consumer Notice1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action
Jul 1, 2018OtherConsumer Confidence RuleConsumer Confidence Report Complete Failure to Report1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Jun 5, 2025 (sanitary survey); 3 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 3 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records