Tap Water Lookup

EPA system FL6520336 · Florida

Clearwater Water System: 3 PFAS found; PFOS averaged 2.9 ppt, below the 4.0 ppt limit

System ID FL6520336; community water system; Florida; source: groundwater; serves 115,000 people via 35,470 connections; status: active

In focus115,000people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referencePFOS
PFOS: 2.9 ppt; MCL 4.0 ppt. highest complete sampling-location average.2.9 pptMCL: 4.0 ppt

highest complete sampling-location average; sampled July 2024–May 2025. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Clearwater Water System is a local-government-owned community water system in Florida serving about 115,000 people, matched to 9 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
28 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
2.9 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
2 of 2 results at the highest location; highest single sample 5.9 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · below the MCL
< 9 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
28 samples, none above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · not detected above the reporting level
3 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
840 results, 8 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
2.5 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 1, 2021
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
7 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (22 of 22 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 22 of 28 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • PFOS EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOS at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOS exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFBS EPA's 2021 PFBS toxicity assessment cites thyroid, kidney and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 3. PFOS averaged 2.9 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. That PFOS result is higher than 90% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it.

Between July 2024 and September 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 840 samples from 8 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 3 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOS was 2.9 ppt, below the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 5.9 ppt).

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
PFPeAhighest single sample
3.5 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFOScomplete-set average
2.9 ppt
below the MCL
PFBShighest single sample
3.0 ppt
below the health-based water concentration
Show the 27 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Lithiumnot detected · reporting level 9 ppb
< 9 ppb
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
PFPeA2863.5 ppt1.6 ppt (4 of 4)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueJuly 2024 – May 2025
PFOS2815.9 ppt2.9 ppt (2 of 2)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the MCLJuly 2024 – May 2025
PFBS2813.0 ppt1.5 ppt (2 of 2)2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplebelow the health-based water concentrationJuly 2024 – May 2025
11Cl-PF3OUdS280< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – May 2025
4:2 FTS280< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – May 2025
6:2 FTS280< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – May 2025
8:2 FTS280< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – May 2025
9Cl-PF3ONS280< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – May 2025
ADONA280< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – May 2025
HFPO-DA (GenX)280< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – May 2025
Lithium280< 9 ppb10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – April 2025
NEtFOSAA280< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – September 2025
NFDHA280< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – May 2025
NMeFOSAA280< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – September 2025
PFBA280< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – May 2025
PFDA280< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – May 2025
PFDoA280< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – May 2025
PFEESA280< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – May 2025
PFHpA280< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – May 2025
PFHpS280< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – May 2025
PFHxA280< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – May 2025
PFHxS280< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – May 2025
PFMBA280< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – May 2025
PFMPA280< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – May 2025
PFNA280< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – May 2025
PFOA280< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – May 2025
PFPeS280< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – May 2025
PFTA280< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – September 2025
PFTrDA280< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – September 2025
PFUnA280< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – May 2025
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (8 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Jul 8, 2024Interconnect 1 SR60 & Belcher Interconnect #1mixed ground and surface waterPFPeA3.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 8, 2024Interconnect 3 Druid & Belcher Interconnect #3mixed ground and surface waterPFPeA3.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 8, 2024Interconnect 5 Sand Key Interconnect #5mixed ground and surface waterPFPeA3.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 9, 2024WTP3 Point of Entry WTP3mixed ground and surface waterPFPeA3.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 9, 2024RO1 Point of Entry RO1ground waterPFBS3.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 9, 2024RO1 Point of Entry RO1ground waterPFOS5.9 ppt4.0 ppt
Jan 8, 2025Interconnect 5 Sand Key Interconnect #5mixed ground and surface waterPFPeA3.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Jan 8, 2025RO2 PCU Interconnect WTP #2mixed ground and surface waterPFPeA3.1 ppt3.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 22 of 28 sampling events, no at 6 of 28 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: not known at 26 of 28 sampling events, no at 2 of 28 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 22 of 22 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 1, 2021, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 2.5 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 18 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001: 1 ppbJul 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003: 2 ppbJan 1, 2006 – Dec 1, 2006: 8 ppbJan 1, 2008 – Dec 1, 2008: 0 ppbJan 1, 2011 – Dec 1, 2011: 3 ppbJan 1, 2014 – Dec 1, 2014: 3 ppbJan 1, 2016 – Jun 1, 2016: 3 ppbJul 1, 2016 – Dec 1, 2016: 3 ppbJul 1, 2017 – Dec 1, 2017: 0.7 ppbJan 1, 2020 – Jun 1, 2020: 1.6 ppbJul 1, 2020 – Dec 1, 2020: 1.2 ppbJan 1, 2021 – Dec 1, 2021: 2.5 ppbDec 31, 2001Dec 1, 20212.5 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 1, 2021, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 2.5 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (18 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 1, 2021Lead2.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2020 – Dec 1, 2020Lead1.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Jun 1, 2020Lead1.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2017 – Dec 1, 2017Lead0.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2016 – Dec 1, 2016Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Jun 1, 2016Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 1, 2014Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 1, 2011Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 1, 2008Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 1, 2006Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 18 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 1, 2021Lead2.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2020 – Dec 1, 2020Lead1.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Jun 1, 2020Lead1.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2017 – Dec 1, 2017Lead0.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2016 – Dec 1, 2016Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Jun 1, 2016Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 1, 2014Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 1, 2011Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 1, 2008Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 1, 2006Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1999Lead1.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1996Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1994 – Dec 31, 1994Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 7 violations since Sep 3, 2016. None is health-based. All concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices, not the water itself.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 7 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 6 for monitoring or reporting, 1 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements), none health-based.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Aug 1, 2025 – Aug 31, 2025MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action
Jul 1, 2025OtherConsumer Confidence RuleConsumer Confidence Report Complete Failure to Report1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Dec 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Sep 1, 2024 – Sep 30, 2024MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024MRNitrateMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Oct 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023MRTotal Haloacetic Acids (Haa5)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2022MRLead and Copper RuleFollow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/R1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: May 4, 2023 (sanitary survey); 1 visit since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 3 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records