Tap Water Lookup

EPA system IN5249004 · Indiana

Citizens Water - Indianapolis: 4 PFAS found; PFBS up to 4.0 ppt, below the 2,000 ppt health-based water concentration

System ID IN5249004; community water system; Indiana; source: surface water; serves 880,345 people via 352,138 connections; status: active

In focus880,345people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referencePFBS
PFBS: 4.0 ppt; health-based water concentration 2,000 ppt. highest single sample.4.0 ppthealth-based water concentration: 2,000 ppt

highest single sample; sampled August 2023–July 2024. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Citizens Water - Indianapolis is a local-government-owned community water system in Indiana serving about 880,345 people, matched to 52 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
26 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
26 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 9 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
26 samples, none above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · not detected above the reporting level
4 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
780 results, 9 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
5.2 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
1 violation in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (26 of 26 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 26 of 26 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • PFBS EPA's 2021 PFBS toxicity assessment cites thyroid, kidney and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source
  • PFHxA EPA's 2023 IRIS assessment for PFHxA cites developmental, liver and blood effects in animal studies. EPA source
  • PFBA EPA's 2022 IRIS assessment for PFBA cites thyroid, liver and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 4.

Between August 2023 and August 2024, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 780 samples from 9 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 4 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
PFPeAhighest single sample
7.6 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFBShighest single sample
4.0 ppt
below the health-based water concentration
PFHxAhighest single sample
5.1 ppt
below the screening level
PFBAhighest single sample
5.7 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 26 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Lithiumnot detected · reporting level 9 ppb
< 9 ppb
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
PFPeA26117.6 ppt6.4 ppt (2 of 2)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueAugust 2023 – July 2024
PFBS2634.0 ppt3.9 ppt (2 of 2)2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplebelow the health-based water concentrationAugust 2023 – July 2024
PFHxA2695.1 ppt3.7 ppt (4 of 4)3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelAugust 2023 – July 2024
PFBA2625.7 ppt2.7 ppt (4 of 4)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelAugust 2023 – July 2024
11Cl-PF3OUdS260< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – July 2024
4:2 FTS260< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – July 2024
6:2 FTS260< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – July 2024
8:2 FTS260< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – July 2024
9Cl-PF3ONS260< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – July 2024
ADONA260< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – July 2024
HFPO-DA (GenX)260< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – July 2024
Lithium260< 9 ppb10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – July 2024
NEtFOSAA260< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – August 2024
NFDHA260< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – July 2024
NMeFOSAA260< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – August 2024
PFDA260< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – July 2024
PFDoA260< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – July 2024
PFEESA260< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – July 2024
PFHpA260< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – July 2024
PFHpS260< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – July 2024
PFHxS260< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – July 2024
PFMBA260< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – July 2024
PFMPA260< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – July 2024
PFNA260< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – July 2024
PFOA260< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – July 2024
PFOS260< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – July 2024
PFPeS260< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – July 2024
PFTA260< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – August 2024
PFTrDA260< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – August 2024
PFUnA260< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – July 2024
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (25 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Aug 23, 2023White River Treatment Plant #1surface waterPFHxA4.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 23, 2023White River Treatment Plant #1surface waterPFPeA5.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 23, 2023T.W. Moses Treatment Plant #3surface waterPFBA5.0 ppt5.0 ppt
Aug 23, 2023T.W. Moses Treatment Plant #3surface waterPFHxA4.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 23, 2023T.W. Moses Treatment Plant #3surface waterPFPeA6.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 23, 2023GW & SW Combined Effluent White River North Reservoirmixed ground and surface waterPFPeA3.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 30, 2023Ford Road Treatment Plant #8ground waterPFBS4.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 30, 2023Ford Road Treatment Plant #8ground waterPFHxA4.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 30, 2023Ford Road Treatment Plant #8ground waterPFPeA7.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Nov 7, 2023GW & SW Combined Effluent White River North Reservoirmixed ground and surface waterPFPeA4.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Nov 8, 2023White River Treatment Plant #1surface waterPFHxA5.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Nov 8, 2023White River Treatment Plant #1surface waterPFPeA6.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Nov 8, 2023Fall Creek Treatment Plant #2surface waterPFHxA3.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Nov 8, 2023T.W. Moses Treatment Plant #3surface waterPFBS3.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Nov 8, 2023T.W. Moses Treatment Plant #3surface waterPFHxA5.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Nov 8, 2023T.W. Moses Treatment Plant #3surface waterPFPeA7.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 19, 2024T.W. Moses Treatment Plant #3surface waterPFBA5.7 ppt5.0 ppt
Feb 19, 2024T.W. Moses Treatment Plant #3surface waterPFHxA4.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 19, 2024T.W. Moses Treatment Plant #3surface waterPFPeA6.1 ppt3.0 ppt
May 2, 2024White River Treatment Plant #1surface waterPFHxA3.6 ppt3.0 ppt
May 2, 2024White River Treatment Plant #1surface waterPFPeA3.0 ppt3.0 ppt
May 3, 2024Fall Creek Treatment Plant #2surface waterPFHxA3.5 ppt3.0 ppt
May 3, 2024Fall Creek Treatment Plant #2surface waterPFPeA4.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 12, 2024Ford Road Treatment Plant #8ground waterPFBS3.8 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 12, 2024Ford Road Treatment Plant #8ground waterPFPeA5.3 ppt3.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 26 of 26 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 26 of 26 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 26 of 26 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 5.2 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 22 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007: 10.9 ppbJan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008: 8.2 ppbJan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009: 10 ppbJan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014: 14.2 ppbJan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015: 8 ppbJan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016: 5.6 ppbJan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018: 8.1 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021: 7.7 ppbJan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022: 9.1 ppbJan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2023: 7.7 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025: 5.2 ppbJul 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025: 4.7 ppbDec 31, 2007Dec 31, 20254.7 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 5.2 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (22 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead5.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead4.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2023Lead7.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022Lead9.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead7.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018Lead8.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016Lead5.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014Lead14.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008Lead8.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007Lead10.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 22 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead5.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead4.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2023Lead7.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022Lead9.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead7.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018Lead8.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016Lead5.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014Lead14.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008Lead8.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007Lead10.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Jun 30, 2006Lead11 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead0.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000Lead9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Jun 30, 1999Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead13 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Jun 30, 1997Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 1 violation since Sep 3, 2016. None is health-based. All concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices, not the water itself.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 1 violation recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 1 for monitoring or reporting, none health-based.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Nov 1, 2020 – Nov 30, 2020MRInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Feb 18, 2026 (reason not recorded); 27 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 4 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Filters certified for lead reduction

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 5.2 ppb.

NSF/ANSI 53 with a lead-reduction claim, or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. Lead comes from plumbing, so a point-of-use filter at the kitchen tap is the relevant type.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records