Tap Water Lookup

EPA system MD0300002 · Maryland

City of Baltimore: 1 PFAS found; PFPeA up to 3.0 ppt, no EPA limit set

System ID MD0300002; community water system; Maryland; source: surface water; serves 1,600,000 people via 424,600 connections; status: active

In focus1,600,000people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLead, 90th percentile at customer taps
Lead, 90th percentile at customer taps: 2.7 ppb; action level 15 ppb. 90th percentile for the latest monitoring period.2.7 ppbaction level: 15 ppb

90th percentile for the latest monitoring period; sampled Dec 31, 2024. Source: EPA SDWIS/ECHO.

City of Baltimore is a local-government-owned community water system in Maryland serving about 1,600,000 people, matched to 63 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
12 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
12 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 9 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
12 samples, none above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · not detected above the reporting level
1 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
360 results, 3 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
2.7 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2024
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
2
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
9 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (12 of 12 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 12 of 12 sampling events

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 1.

Between August 2024 and May 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 360 samples from 3 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 1 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
PFPeAhighest single sample
3.0 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
Show the 29 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Lithiumnot detected · reporting level 9 ppb
< 9 ppb
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
PFPeA1213.0 ppt0.8 ppt (4 of 4)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueAugust 2024 – May 2025
11Cl-PF3OUdS120< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
4:2 FTS120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
6:2 FTS120< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
8:2 FTS120< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
9Cl-PF3ONS120< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
ADONA120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
HFPO-DA (GenX)120< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
Lithium120< 9 ppb10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
NEtFOSAA120< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
NFDHA120< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
NMeFOSAA120< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFBA120< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFBS120< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFDA120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFDoA120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFEESA120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFHpA120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFHpS120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFHxA120< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFHxS120< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFMBA120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFMPA120< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFNA120< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFOA120< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFOS120< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFPeS120< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFTA120< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFTrDA120< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFUnA120< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (1 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Nov 13, 2024WTP POE Ashburton Filter Plantsurface waterPFPeA3.0 ppt3.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 12 of 12 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 9 of 12 sampling events, not known at 3 of 12 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 12 of 12 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 2.7 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. The action level has been reached in 1 of the 16 periods on record.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 1999 – Jun 30, 1999: 10 ppbJan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000: 12 ppbJan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001: 11 ppbJan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002: 8 ppbJan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003: 10 ppbJan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006: 11 ppbJan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009: 7 ppbJan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012: 5 ppbJan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015: 5 ppbJan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018: 3 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021: 3.5 ppbJan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024: 2.7 ppbJun 30, 1999Dec 31, 20242.7 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 2.7 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb; 1 of the 16 monitoring periods on record reached the action level. The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024Lead2.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead3.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006Lead11 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead11 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Jun 30, 1999Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 16 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024Lead2.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead3.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006Lead11 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead11 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Jun 30, 1999Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Jun 30, 1997Lead13 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead15 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 9 violations since Sep 3, 2016. 2 are health-based, meaning a contaminant or treatment rule was not met. The other 7 concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 9 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 2 health-based (a contaminant above its maximum contaminant level, a disinfectant above its maximum residual level, or a required treatment technique not met), 6 for monitoring or reporting, 1 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements).

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Jan 1, 2026 – Mar 31, 2026MCL · health-basedTthm (81 UG/L, limit 80 UG/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordArchived · 3 enforcement actions
Sep 1, 2022 – Sep 30, 2022MCL · health-basedRevised Total Coliform RuleMaximum Contaminant Level Violation, E. coli (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Jul 2, 2025RPTLead and Copper Rule RevisionsNotification, Known or Potential LSL1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action
Apr 1, 2023 – Jun 30, 2023MRChlordaneMonitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Apr 1, 2023 – Jun 30, 2023MRToxapheneMonitoring, Regular2 records at 2 facilitiesResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023MRNitrateMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Sep 5, 2022OtherPublic NoticePublic Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Mar 20, 2026 (site visit); 11 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 1 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Filters certified for lead reduction

1 of this utility's 16 lead monitoring periods on record reached the 15 ppb action level (most recent 90th percentile 2.7 ppb).

NSF/ANSI 53 with a lead-reduction claim, or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. Lead comes from plumbing, so a point-of-use filter at the kitchen tap is the relevant type.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records