Tap Water Lookup

EPA system MN1620026 · Minnesota

Saint Paul Regional Water Services: 2 PFAS found; PFBA up to 20.2 ppt, below the 6,000 ppt screening level

System ID MN1620026; community water system; Minnesota; source: surface water; serves 392,529 people via 94,496 connections; status: active

In focus392,529people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referencePFBA
PFBA: 20.2 ppt; screening level 6,000 ppt. highest single sample.20.2 pptscreening level: 6,000 ppt

highest single sample; sampled September 2023–June 2024. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Saint Paul Regional Water Services is a local-government-owned community water system in Minnesota serving about 392,529 people, matched to 19 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
4 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
4 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 9 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
4 samples, none above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · not detected above the reporting level
2 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
120 results, 1 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
8 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
1
health-based violation since Sep 3, 2016
11 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (4 of 4 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 4 of 4 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • PFBA EPA's 2022 IRIS assessment for PFBA cites thyroid, liver and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 2.

Between September 2023 and September 2024, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 120 samples from 1 sampling location for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 2 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
PFPeAhighest single sample
3.0 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFBAhighest single sample
20.2 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 28 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Lithiumnot detected · reporting level 9 ppb
< 9 ppb
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
PFPeA423.0 ppt1.5 ppt (4 of 4)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFBA4420.2 ppt14.6 ppt (4 of 4)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
11Cl-PF3OUdS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
4:2 FTS40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
6:2 FTS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
8:2 FTS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
9Cl-PF3ONS40< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
ADONA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
HFPO-DA (GenX)40< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
Lithium40< 9 ppb10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
NEtFOSAA40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
NFDHA40< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
NMeFOSAA40< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
PFBS40< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFDA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFDoA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFEESA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFHpA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFHpS40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFHxA40< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFHxS40< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFMBA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFMPA40< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFNA40< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFOA40< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFOS40< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFPeS40< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFTA40< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
PFTrDA40< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
PFUnA40< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (6 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Sep 13, 2023TREATMENT PLANT #1 Treatment Plant #1surface waterPFBA10.4 ppt5.0 ppt
Sep 13, 2023TREATMENT PLANT #1 Treatment Plant #1surface waterPFPeA3.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 5, 2023TREATMENT PLANT #1 Treatment Plant #1surface waterPFBA14.5 ppt5.0 ppt
Dec 5, 2023TREATMENT PLANT #1 Treatment Plant #1surface waterPFPeA3.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Mar 18, 2024TREATMENT PLANT #1 Treatment Plant #1surface waterPFBA13.1 ppt5.0 ppt
Jun 11, 2024TREATMENT PLANT #1 Treatment Plant #1surface waterPFBA20.2 ppt5.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 4 of 4 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: not known at 4 of 4 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 4 of 4 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 8 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. The action level has been reached in 9 of the 25 periods on record.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004: 8 ppbJan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005: 11 ppbJan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008: 11 ppbJan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010: 12 ppbJan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011: 13 ppbJan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014: 10 ppbJan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017: 11 ppbJan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2020: 12 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023: 17 ppbJan 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024: 9 ppbJul 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024: 12 ppbJan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025: 8 ppbDec 31, 2004Dec 31, 20258 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 8 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb; 9 of the 25 monitoring periods on record reached the action level (1 within the last 10 years). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024Lead9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023Lead17 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2020Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017Lead11 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011Lead13 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008Lead11 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005Lead11 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 25 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024Lead9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023Lead17 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2020Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017Lead11 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011Lead13 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008Lead11 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005Lead11 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003Lead11 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Jun 30, 2002Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead14 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Jun 30, 2001Lead14 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000Lead15 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Jun 30, 2000Lead19 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead20 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Jun 30, 1999Lead11 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Jun 30, 1998Lead15 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997Lead22 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Jun 30, 1997Lead19 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead28 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead54 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 11 violations since Sep 3, 2016. 1 is health-based, meaning a contaminant or treatment rule was not met. The other 10 concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 11 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 1 health-based (a contaminant above its maximum contaminant level, a disinfectant above its maximum residual level, or a required treatment technique not met), 9 for monitoring or reporting, 1 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements).

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Apr 1, 2022 – Jun 30, 2022TT · health-basedLead and Copper RuleWQP Entry Point/Tap Treatment Technique Non-Compliance1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Apr 1, 2023 – Apr 30, 2023MRInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR)1 recordArchived · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2023OtherLead and Copper RuleRecord Keeping1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Apr 1, 2022 – Apr 30, 2022MRSurface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Filter)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2022 – Jun 30, 2022MRLead and Copper RuleWater Quality Parameter M/R1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action
Jul 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021MRLead and Copper RuleWater Quality Parameter M/R1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action
Jan 1, 2021MRLead and Copper RuleLead Consumer Notice1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2021 – Jun 30, 2021MRLead and Copper RuleWater Quality Parameter M/R1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action
Oct 1, 2020MRLead and Copper RuleFollow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/R1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020MRLead and Copper RuleWater Quality Parameter M/R1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action
Jan 1, 2020 – Jun 30, 2020MRLead and Copper RuleWater Quality Parameter M/R1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Sep 23, 2025 (sanitary survey); 3 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 2 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Filters certified for lead reduction

9 of this utility's 25 lead monitoring periods on record reached the 15 ppb action level (most recent 90th percentile 8 ppb).

NSF/ANSI 53 with a lead-reduction claim, or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. Lead comes from plumbing, so a point-of-use filter at the kitchen tap is the relevant type.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records