Tap Water Lookup

EPA system NC0160010 · North Carolina

Charlotte Water: 2 PFAS found; PFBA up to 9.7 ppt, below the 6,000 ppt screening level

System ID NC0160010; community water system; North Carolina; source: surface water; serves 1,163,701 people via 323,527 connections; status: active

In focus1,163,701people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referencePFBA
PFBA: 9.7 ppt; screening level 6,000 ppt. highest single sample.9.7 pptscreening level: 6,000 ppt

highest single sample; sampled August 2023–May 2024. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Charlotte Water is a local-government-owned community water system in North Carolina serving about 1,163,701 people, matched to 35 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
20 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
20 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 9 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
20 samples, none above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · not detected above the reporting level
2 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
600 results, 5 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
0 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
0 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (20 of 20 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 20 of 20 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • PFBA EPA's 2022 IRIS assessment for PFBA cites thyroid, liver and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 2.

Between August 2023 and May 2024, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 600 samples from 5 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 2 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
PFPeAhighest single sample
3.4 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFBAhighest single sample
9.7 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 28 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Lithiumnot detected · reporting level 9 ppb
< 9 ppb
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
PFPeA2043.4 ppt0.9 ppt (4 of 4)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFBA2029.7 ppt2.4 ppt (4 of 4)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
11Cl-PF3OUdS200< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
4:2 FTS200< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
6:2 FTS200< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
8:2 FTS200< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
9Cl-PF3ONS200< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
ADONA200< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
HFPO-DA (GenX)200< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
Lithium200< 9 ppb10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
NEtFOSAA200< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
NFDHA200< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
NMeFOSAA200< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFBS200< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFDA200< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFDoA200< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFEESA200< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFHpA200< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFHpS200< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFHxA200< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFHxS200< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFMBA200< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFMPA200< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFNA200< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFOA200< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFOS200< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFPeS200< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFTA200< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFTrDA200< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFUnA200< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (6 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Aug 8, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Franklin Ep Westsurface waterPFBA5.3 ppt5.0 ppt
Aug 8, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Franklin Ep Westsurface waterPFPeA3.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 8, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Franklin Ep Eastsurface waterPFPeA3.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 8, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Lee Dukes WTPsurface waterPFBA9.7 ppt5.0 ppt
Aug 8, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Vest 24 Southsurface waterPFPeA3.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 8, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Vest WTPsurface waterPFPeA3.3 ppt3.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 20 of 20 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 20 of 20 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 20 of 20 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 0 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 13 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992: 4 ppbJan 1, 2000 – Jun 30, 2000: 8 ppbJul 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002: 4 ppbJul 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003: 0 ppbJul 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004: 0 ppbJan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007: 0 ppbJan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010: 0 ppbJan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013: 6 ppbJan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016: 0 ppbJan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019: 0 ppbJan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022: 0 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025: 0 ppbDec 31, 1992Dec 31, 20250 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 0 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (13 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Jun 30, 2000Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 13 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Jun 30, 2000Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists no drinking-water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.

EPA's SDWIS database lists no drinking water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.

None on file.

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Jun 18, 2026 (reason not recorded); 52 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 2 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records