Tap Water Lookup

EPA system NJ0508001 · New Jersey

Nj American Water - Ocean City: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID NJ0508001; community water system; New Jersey; source: groundwater; serves 127,000 people via 13,677 connections; status: active

In focus127,000people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 12.2 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.12.2 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled January 2023–June 2024. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Nj American Water - Ocean City is a privately owned community water system in New Jersey serving about 127,000 people, matched to 2 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
16 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
16 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
12.2 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
8 of 16 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
0 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
480 results, 8 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
0 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
0 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (16 of 16 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 16 of 16 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 1. Lithium reached 12.2 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between January 2023 and June 2024, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 480 samples from 8 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 1 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Lithium reached 12.2 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
12.2 ppb
at or above the health reference level
Show the 29 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium16812.2 ppb11.0 ppb (2 of 2)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
11Cl-PF3OUdS160< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
4:2 FTS160< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
6:2 FTS160< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
8:2 FTS160< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
9Cl-PF3ONS160< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
ADONA160< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
HFPO-DA (GenX)160< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
NEtFOSAA160< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
NFDHA160< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
NMeFOSAA160< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
PFBA160< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
PFBS160< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
PFDA160< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
PFDoA160< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
PFEESA160< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
PFHpA160< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
PFHpS160< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
PFHxA160< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
PFHxS160< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
PFMBA160< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
PFMPA160< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
PFNA160< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
PFOA160< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
PFOS160< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
PFPeA160< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
PFPeS160< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
PFTA160< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
PFTrDA160< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
PFUnA160< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2023 – June 2024
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (8 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Jan 18, 202327th St Well 16 Treatment Plantground waterLithium10.1 ppb9 ppb
May 22, 202335th St Well 14 Treatment Plantground waterLithium10.5 ppb9 ppb
May 31, 2023North St Well 13 Treatment Plantground waterLithium10.1 ppb9 ppb
Jul 19, 20233rd St Well 17 Treatment Plantground waterLithium12.2 ppb9 ppb
Jul 19, 2023Stagecoach Well 15 Treatment Plantground waterLithium9.9 ppb9 ppb
Jul 20, 202327th St Well 16 Treatment Plantground waterLithium11.8 ppb9 ppb
May 7, 2024North St Well 13 Treatment Plantground waterLithium10.8 ppb9 ppb
Jun 24, 202452nd St Well 18 Treatment Plantground waterLithium10.3 ppb9 ppb

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 16 of 16 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 16 of 16 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 16 of 16 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 0 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 15 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jul 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995: 2 ppbJul 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1996: 2 ppbJul 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999: 3 ppbJul 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000: 3 ppbJan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005: 2 ppbJan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007: 1 ppbJan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010: 1 ppbJan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013: 0 ppbJan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016: 2 ppbJan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019: 2 ppbJan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022: 1 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025: 0 ppbDec 31, 1995Dec 31, 20250 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 0 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (15 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1996Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 15 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1996Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1994 – Jun 30, 1994Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Jun 30, 1993Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists no drinking-water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.

EPA's SDWIS database lists no drinking water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.

None on file.

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Apr 8, 2025 (sanitary survey); 2 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 12.2 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records