Tap Water Lookup

EPA system NJ0714001 · New Jersey

Newark Water Department: PFOA at or above EPA's 4.0 ppt limit

System ID NJ0714001; community water system; New Jersey; source: surface water; serves 294,274 people via 36,402 connections; status: active

In focus294,274people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referencePFOA
PFOA: 4.8 ppt; MCL 4.0 ppt. highest complete sampling-location average.4.8 pptMCL: 4.0 ppt

highest complete sampling-location average; sampled February 2023–November 2023. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Newark Water Department is a local-government-owned community water system in New Jersey serving about 294,274 people, matched to 17 ZIP codes.

4.8 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
4 of 4 results at the highest location; highest single sample 5.3 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · at or above the MCL
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
8 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 9 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
8 samples, none above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · not detected above the reporting level
1 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
240 results, 2 entry points
1 at or above an MCL on the average basis
0 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
16
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
21 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: Granular activated carbon · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 3 of 8 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • PFOA EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOA at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOA exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 1. PFOA averaged 4.8 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. EPA's limit applies to a running yearly average and is enforced from 2029. That PFOA result is higher than 93% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it.

Between February 2023 and November 2023, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 240 samples from 2 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 1 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOA was 4.8 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 5.3 ppt).

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
PFOAcomplete-set average
4.8 ppt
at or above the MCL
Show the 29 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Lithiumnot detected · reporting level 9 ppb
< 9 ppb
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
PFOA845.3 ppt4.8 ppt (4 of 4)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averageat or above the MCLFebruary 2023 – November 2023
11Cl-PF3OUdS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
4:2 FTS80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
6:2 FTS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
8:2 FTS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
9Cl-PF3ONS80< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
ADONA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
HFPO-DA (GenX)80< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
Lithium80< 9 ppb10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
NEtFOSAA80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
NFDHA80< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
NMeFOSAA80< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFBA80< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFBS80< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFDA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFDoA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFEESA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFHpA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFHpS80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFHxA80< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFHxS80< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFMBA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFMPA80< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFNA80< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFOS80< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFPeA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFPeS80< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFTA80< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFTrDA80< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFUnA80< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (4 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Feb 16, 2023Representative Intertie Wanaque North Consecutive Connectionsurface waterPFOA4.7 ppt4.0 ppt
May 16, 2023Representative Intertie Wanaque North Consecutive Connectionsurface waterPFOA4.3 ppt4.0 ppt
Aug 16, 2023Representative Intertie Wanaque North Consecutive Connectionsurface waterPFOA5.3 ppt4.0 ppt
Nov 15, 2023Representative Intertie Wanaque North Consecutive Connectionsurface waterPFOA4.9 ppt4.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: not known at 5 of 8 sampling events, yes at 3 of 8 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: not known at 7 of 8 sampling events, no at 1 of 8 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: granular activated carbon at 3 of 3 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 0 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. The action level has been reached in 7 of the 29 periods on record.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 2019 – Jun 30, 2019: 57 ppbJul 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019: 31 ppbJan 1, 2020 – Jun 30, 2020: 13.9 ppbJul 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020: 13 ppbJan 1, 2021 – Jun 30, 2021: 6.6 ppbJul 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021: 9.8 ppbJan 1, 2022 – Jun 30, 2022: 4.4 ppbJul 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022: 4.8 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Jun 30, 2023: 4.1 ppbJul 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023: 0 ppbJan 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024: 0 ppbJan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025: 0 ppbJun 30, 2019Dec 31, 20250 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 0 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb; 7 of the 29 monitoring periods on record reached the action level (6 within the last 10 years). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2023 – Jun 30, 2023Lead4.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022Lead4.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2022 – Jun 30, 2022Lead4.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021Lead9.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2021 – Jun 30, 2021Lead6.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020Lead13 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Jun 30, 2020Lead13.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019Lead31 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Jun 30, 2019Lead57 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Show all 29 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2023 – Jun 30, 2023Lead4.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022Lead4.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2022 – Jun 30, 2022Lead4.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021Lead9.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2021 – Jun 30, 2021Lead6.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020Lead13 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Jun 30, 2020Lead13.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019Lead31 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Jun 30, 2019Lead57 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead47.9 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Jun 30, 2018Lead17.8 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017Lead26.7 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017Lead27 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009Lead11 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead7.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead8.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead13.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Jun 30, 2002Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Jun 30, 2000Lead11 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead12.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead10.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Jun 30, 1998Lead12.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead22.6 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 21 violations since Sep 3, 2016. 16 are health-based, meaning a contaminant or treatment rule was not met. The other 5 concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 21 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 16 health-based (a contaminant above its maximum contaminant level, a disinfectant above its maximum residual level, or a required treatment technique not met), 3 for monitoring or reporting, 2 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements).

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Jul 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022TT · health-basedLead and Copper RuleWQP Entry Point/Tap Treatment Technique Non-Compliance1 recordResolved · 6 enforcement actions
Sep 1, 2020 – Sep 30, 2020TT · health-basedInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleSingle Turbidity Exceed (Enhanced SWTR)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Sep 1, 2020 – Sep 30, 2020TT · health-basedSurface Water Treatment RuleTreatment Technique (SWTR and GWR)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Mar 31, 2020MCL · health-basedTotal Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) (0.066 MG/L, limit 0.060 mg/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Oct 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019MCL · health-basedTotal Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) (0.067 MG/L, limit 0.060 mg/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2019 – Sep 30, 2019MCL · health-basedTotal Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) (0.067 MG/L, limit 0.060 mg/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Apr 1, 2019 – Jun 30, 2019MCL · health-basedTotal Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) (0.084 MG/L, limit 0.060 mg/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Apr 1, 2019 – Jun 30, 2019MCL · health-basedTthm (0.093 MG/L, limit 0.080 mg/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Mar 2, 2019TT · health-basedLead and Copper RulePublic Education1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2019 – Mar 31, 2019MCL · health-basedTthm (0.088 MG/L, limit 0.080 mg/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 5 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2019 – Mar 31, 2019MCL · health-basedTotal Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) (0.093 MG/L, limit 0.060 mg/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 5 enforcement actions
Dec 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018TT · health-basedInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleMonthly Turbidity Exceed (Enhanced SWTR)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Nov 1, 2018 – Nov 30, 2018TT · health-basedInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleMonthly Turbidity Exceed (Enhanced SWTR)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Oct 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018MCL · health-basedTotal Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) (0.082 MG/L, limit 0.060 mg/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 5 enforcement actions
Sep 1, 2018TT · health-basedLead and Copper RulePublic Education1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2018 – Sep 30, 2018MCL · health-basedTotal Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) (0.081 MG/L, limit 0.060 mg/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 5 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021MRLead and Copper RuleWater Quality Parameter M/R1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2020OtherConsumer Confidence RuleConsumer Confidence Report Complete Failure to Report1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2020 – Jun 30, 2020MRLead and Copper RuleWater Quality Parameter M/R1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2019OtherConsumer Confidence RuleConsumer Confidence Report Complete Failure to Report1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017MRCyanideMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Oct 3, 2024 (sanitary survey); 2 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 1 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Filters certified for lead reduction

7 of this utility's 29 lead monitoring periods on record reached the 15 ppb action level (most recent 90th percentile 0 ppb).

NSF/ANSI 53 with a lead-reduction claim, or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. Lead comes from plumbing, so a point-of-use filter at the kitchen tap is the relevant type.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records