EPA system NJ0906001 · New Jersey
Jersey City MUA: PFOA at or above EPA's 4.0 ppt limit
highest complete sampling-location average; sampled February 2023–July 2024. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.
Jersey City MUA is a local-government-owned community water system in New Jersey serving about 262,000 people, matched to 8 ZIP codes.
MCL 4.0 ppt · at or above the MCL
MCL 4.0 ppt · not compared: the monitoring set is incomplete
health reference level 10 ppb · not detected above the reporting level
What EPA says about what was found
- PFOA EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOA at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOA exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
- PFHxA EPA's 2023 IRIS assessment for PFHxA cites developmental, liver and blood effects in animal studies. EPA source
- PFOS EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOS at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOS exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
- PFHxS EPA's 2024 rule cites health effects assessments associating PFHxS with thyroid, liver and immune effects. EPA source
Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.
PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found
EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 5. PFOS was found, but too few samples exist to compare it with EPA's limit the way EPA does. PFOA averaged 5.9 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. EPA's limit applies to a running yearly average and is enforced from 2029. That PFOA result is higher than 95% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it.
Between February 2023 and July 2024, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 116 samples from 1 sampling location for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 5 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOA was 5.9 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 9.2 ppt). PFOS reached 7.7 ppt in a single sample, but no sampling location completed the 4-sample set EPA averages against the 4.0 ppt limit, so no comparison is made here.
Show the 25 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
| Contaminant | Samples | Detections | Highest single sample | Complete-set average (results used) | EPA reference | Status | Sampled |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFOS | 3 | 3 | 7.7 ppt | no complete set | 4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set average | not compared: the monitoring set is incomplete | October 2023 – July 2024 |
| PFHxS | 3 | 3 | 5.0 ppt | no complete set | 10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set average | not compared: the monitoring set is incomplete | October 2023 – July 2024 |
| PFPeA | 4 | 3 | 4.5 ppt | 3.0 ppt (4 of 4) | none set | detected; no EPA reference value | February 2023 – July 2024 |
| PFOA | 4 | 3 | 9.2 ppt | 5.9 ppt (4 of 4) | 4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set average | at or above the MCL | February 2023 – July 2024 |
| PFHxA | 4 | 3 | 3.7 ppt | 2.6 ppt (4 of 4) | 3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest sample | below the screening level | February 2023 – July 2024 |
| 11Cl-PF3OUdS | 4 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | February 2023 – July 2024 |
| 4:2 FTS | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | February 2023 – July 2024 |
| 6:2 FTS | 4 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | February 2023 – July 2024 |
| 8:2 FTS | 4 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | February 2023 – July 2024 |
| 9Cl-PF3ONS | 4 | 0 | < 2.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | February 2023 – July 2024 |
| ADONA | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | February 2023 – July 2024 |
| HFPO-DA (GenX) | 4 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | 10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set average | not detected above the reporting level | February 2023 – July 2024 |
| Lithium | 4 | 0 | < 9 ppb | — | 10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sample | not detected above the reporting level | February 2023 – November 2023 |
| NEtFOSAA | 4 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | February 2023 – November 2023 |
| NFDHA | 3 | 0 | < 20.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | October 2023 – July 2024 |
| NMeFOSAA | 4 | 0 | < 6.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | February 2023 – November 2023 |
| PFBA | 4 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | 6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest sample | not detected above the reporting level | February 2023 – July 2024 |
| PFBS | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | 2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest sample | not detected above the reporting level | February 2023 – July 2024 |
| PFDA | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | February 2023 – July 2024 |
| PFDoA | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | February 2023 – July 2024 |
| PFEESA | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | February 2023 – July 2024 |
| PFHpA | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | February 2023 – July 2024 |
| PFHpS | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | February 2023 – July 2024 |
| PFMBA | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | February 2023 – July 2024 |
| PFMPA | 4 | 0 | < 4.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | February 2023 – July 2024 |
| PFNA | 4 | 0 | < 4.0 ppt | — | 10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set average | not detected above the reporting level | February 2023 – July 2024 |
| PFPeS | 4 | 0 | < 4.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | February 2023 – July 2024 |
| PFTA | 4 | 0 | < 8.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | February 2023 – November 2023 |
| PFTrDA | 4 | 0 | < 7.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | February 2023 – November 2023 |
| PFUnA | 3 | 0 | < 2.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | October 2023 – July 2024 |
Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.
Every detection by sampling location (15 results)
| Date | Sampling location | Source water | Contaminant | Result | Reporting level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2023 | Entry Point to Dist. System Jersey City Reservoir Tp | surface water | PFHxA | 3.5 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Oct 16, 2023 | Entry Point to Dist. System Jersey City Reservoir Tp | surface water | PFHxS | 4.9 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Oct 16, 2023 | Entry Point to Dist. System Jersey City Reservoir Tp | surface water | PFOA | 7.6 ppt | 4.0 ppt |
| Oct 16, 2023 | Entry Point to Dist. System Jersey City Reservoir Tp | surface water | PFOS | 6.7 ppt | 4.0 ppt |
| Oct 16, 2023 | Entry Point to Dist. System Jersey City Reservoir Tp | surface water | PFPeA | 4.0 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Nov 6, 2023 | Entry Point to Dist. System Jersey City Reservoir Tp | surface water | PFHxA | 3.1 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Nov 6, 2023 | Entry Point to Dist. System Jersey City Reservoir Tp | surface water | PFHxS | 4.9 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Nov 6, 2023 | Entry Point to Dist. System Jersey City Reservoir Tp | surface water | PFOA | 6.9 ppt | 4.0 ppt |
| Nov 6, 2023 | Entry Point to Dist. System Jersey City Reservoir Tp | surface water | PFOS | 6.2 ppt | 4.0 ppt |
| Nov 6, 2023 | Entry Point to Dist. System Jersey City Reservoir Tp | surface water | PFPeA | 3.6 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Jul 29, 2024 | Entry Point to Dist. System Jersey City Reservoir Tp | surface water | PFHxA | 3.7 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Jul 29, 2024 | Entry Point to Dist. System Jersey City Reservoir Tp | surface water | PFHxS | 5.0 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Jul 29, 2024 | Entry Point to Dist. System Jersey City Reservoir Tp | surface water | PFOA | 9.2 ppt | 4.0 ppt |
| Jul 29, 2024 | Entry Point to Dist. System Jersey City Reservoir Tp | surface water | PFOS | 7.7 ppt | 4.0 ppt |
| Jul 29, 2024 | Entry Point to Dist. System Jersey City Reservoir Tp | surface water | PFPeA | 4.5 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 4 of 4 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: yes at 4 of 4 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 4 of 4 sampling events.
Lead at customer taps
In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 5.6 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. The action level has been reached in 2 of the 23 periods on record.
In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 5.6 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb; 2 of the 23 monitoring periods on record reached the action level. The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).
| Monitoring period | Metal | 90th percentile | Action level | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025 | Lead | 5.6 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024 | Lead | 5.1 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023 | Lead | 4.1 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022 | Lead | 4.2 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021 | Lead | 4.5 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020 | Lead | 4.4 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019 | Lead | 4.1 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018 | Lead | 6.7 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jul 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017 | Lead | 6.7 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017 | Lead | 9.6 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015 | Lead | 7.4 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012 | Lead | 6.1 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
Show all 23 monitoring periods on record
| Monitoring period | Metal | 90th percentile | Action level | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025 | Lead | 5.6 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024 | Lead | 5.1 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023 | Lead | 4.1 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022 | Lead | 4.2 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021 | Lead | 4.5 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020 | Lead | 4.4 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019 | Lead | 4.1 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018 | Lead | 6.7 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jul 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017 | Lead | 6.7 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017 | Lead | 9.6 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015 | Lead | 7.4 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012 | Lead | 6.1 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009 | Lead | 8 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 | Lead | 12 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004 | Lead | 1.1 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jul 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001 | Lead | 8.8 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jul 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000 | Lead | 10.6 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jul 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999 | Lead | 8.4 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 1998 – Jun 30, 1998 | Lead | 14.1 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jul 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997 | Lead | 14.6 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 1997 – Jun 30, 1997 | Lead | 23 ppb | 15 ppb | at or above the action level |
| Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992 | Lead | 58 ppb | 15 ppb | at or above the action level |
| Jan 1, 2026 – Dec 31, 2026 | Lead | 5.7 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016
EPA lists 8 violations since Sep 3, 2016. 1 is health-based, meaning a contaminant or treatment rule was not met. The other 7 concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices.
EPA's SDWIS database lists 8 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 1 health-based (a contaminant above its maximum contaminant level, a disinfectant above its maximum residual level, or a required treatment technique not met), 4 for monitoring or reporting, 3 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements).
| Compliance period | Type | Contaminant / rule | Description | Records | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2020 – Aug 31, 2020 | MCL · health-based | Revised Total Coliform Rule | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, E. coli (RTCR) | 1 record | Resolved · 5 enforcement actions |
| Dec 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025 | MR | Surface Water Treatment Rule | Monitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Filter) | 1 record | Archived · 2 enforcement actions |
| Jul 1, 2021 | Other | Consumer Confidence Rule | Consumer Confidence Report Complete Failure to Report | 1 record | Resolved · 2 enforcement actions |
| Dec 5, 2020 | Other | Public Notice | Public Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation | 1 record | Resolved · 3 enforcement actions |
| Aug 13, 2020 | Other | Public Notice | Public Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation | 1 record | Resolved · 4 enforcement actions |
| Aug 11, 2018 | RPT | Revised Total Coliform Rule | Report Sample Result/Fail Monitor (RTCR) | 1 record | Resolved · 2 enforcement actions |
| Jul 1, 2018 – Jul 31, 2018 | MON | Revised Total Coliform Rule | Monitoring, Routine (RTCR) | 1 record | Resolved · 4 enforcement actions |
| Jul 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017 | MR | Lead and Copper Rule | Water Quality Parameter M/R | 1 record | Resolved · 3 enforcement actions |
Sanitary surveys and site visits
Most recent state inspection: Oct 23, 2020 (reason not recorded); 0 visits since Sep 3, 2021.
What you can do about these results
Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS
EPA testing found 5 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.
Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.
Filters certified for lead reduction
2 of this utility's 23 lead monitoring periods on record reached the 15 ppb action level (most recent 90th percentile 5.6 ppb).
NSF/ANSI 53 with a lead-reduction claim, or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. Lead comes from plumbing, so a point-of-use filter at the kitchen tap is the relevant type.
ZIP codes served
Sources
Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.
- EPA ECHO detailed facility report
- EPA UCMR 5 Data Finder
- EPA service-area boundary: modeled, 15.2 sq mi
