Tap Water Lookup

EPA system NJ1225001 · New Jersey

Middlesex Water Company: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID NJ1225001; community water system; New Jersey; source: surface water; serves 233,376 people via 58,344 connections; status: active

In focus233,376people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 14 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.14 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled November 2023–August 2024. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Middlesex Water Company is a privately owned community water system in New Jersey serving about 233,376 people, matched to 17 ZIP codes.

2.8 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
4 of 4 results at the highest location; highest single sample 6.5 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · below the MCL
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
10 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
14 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
2 of 10 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
4 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
300 results, 3 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
0.8 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Jun 30, 2026
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
1
health-based violation since Sep 3, 2016
10 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: Granular activated carbon (2 of 10 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 10 of 10 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
  • PFOA EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOA at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOA exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFHxA EPA's 2023 IRIS assessment for PFHxA cites developmental, liver and blood effects in animal studies. EPA source
  • PFBA EPA's 2022 IRIS assessment for PFBA cites thyroid, liver and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 5. PFOA averaged 2.8 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. That PFOA result is higher than 91% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it. Lithium reached 14 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between November 2023 and August 2024, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 300 samples from 3 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 5 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOA was 2.8 ppt, below the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 6.5 ppt). Lithium reached 14 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
PFPeAhighest single sample
5.4 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
Lithiumhighest single sample
14 ppb
at or above the health reference level
PFOAcomplete-set average
2.8 ppt
below the MCL
PFHxAhighest single sample
4.4 ppt
below the screening level
PFBAhighest single sample
7.3 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 25 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
PFPeA1055.4 ppt2.7 ppt (4 of 4)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueNovember 2023 – August 2024
Lithium10214 ppb13 ppb (2 of 2)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
PFOA1036.5 ppt2.8 ppt (4 of 4)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the MCLNovember 2023 – August 2024
PFHxA1024.4 ppt1.1 ppt (4 of 4)3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
PFBA1017.3 ppt3.7 ppt (2 of 2)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
11Cl-PF3OUdS100< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
4:2 FTS100< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
6:2 FTS100< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
8:2 FTS100< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
9Cl-PF3ONS100< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
ADONA100< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
HFPO-DA (GenX)100< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
NEtFOSAA100< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
NFDHA100< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
NMeFOSAA100< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
PFBS100< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
PFDA100< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
PFDoA100< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
PFEESA100< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
PFHpA100< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
PFHpS100< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
PFHxS100< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
PFMBA100< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
PFMPA100< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
PFNA100< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
PFOS100< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
PFPeS100< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
PFTA100< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
PFTrDA100< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
PFUnA100< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelNovember 2023 – August 2024
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (13 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Nov 14, 2023Representative Intertie Njawc Raritan Cons. Connectionsurface waterPFPeA3.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Nov 14, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Park Ave. Tpground waterPFBA7.3 ppt5.0 ppt
Nov 14, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Park Ave. Tpground waterLithium12 ppb9 ppb
May 13, 2024Representative Intertie Njawc Raritan Cons. Connectionsurface waterPFOA4.5 ppt4.0 ppt
May 13, 2024Representative Intertie Njawc Raritan Cons. Connectionsurface waterPFPeA3.0 ppt3.0 ppt
May 13, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Park Ave. Tpground waterPFPeA5.4 ppt3.0 ppt
May 13, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Park Ave. Tpground waterLithium14 ppb9 ppb
Aug 13, 2024Representative Intertie Njawc Raritan Cons. Connectionsurface waterPFHxA4.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 13, 2024Representative Intertie Njawc Raritan Cons. Connectionsurface waterPFOA6.5 ppt4.0 ppt
Aug 13, 2024Representative Intertie Njawc Raritan Cons. Connectionsurface waterPFPeA4.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 13, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Carl Olson Surface WTPsurface waterPFHxA3.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 13, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Carl Olson Surface WTPsurface waterPFOA4.5 ppt4.0 ppt
Aug 13, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Carl Olson Surface WTPsurface waterPFPeA3.3 ppt3.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 10 of 10 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 4 of 10 sampling events, not known at 4 of 10 sampling events, yes at 2 of 10 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 8 of 10 sampling events, granular activated carbon at 2 of 10 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Jun 30, 2026, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 0.8 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 28 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jul 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020: 1.0 ppbJan 1, 2021 – Jun 30, 2021: 1.0 ppbJul 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021: 0.9 ppbJan 1, 2022 – Jun 30, 2022: 6.7 ppbJul 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022: 2.0 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Jun 30, 2023: 1.2 ppbJul 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023: 1.2 ppbJan 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024: 0.9 ppbJul 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024: 0.6 ppbJan 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2025: 1.1 ppbJul 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025: 1.0 ppbJan 1, 2026 – Jun 30, 2026: 0.8 ppbDec 31, 2020Jun 30, 20260.8 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Jun 30, 2026, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 0.8 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (28 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2026 – Jun 30, 2026Lead0.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead1.0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2025Lead1.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024Lead0.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024Lead0.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023Lead1.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2023 – Jun 30, 2023Lead1.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022Lead2.0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2022 – Jun 30, 2022Lead6.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021Lead0.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2021 – Jun 30, 2021Lead1.0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020Lead1.0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 28 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2026 – Jun 30, 2026Lead0.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead1.0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2025Lead1.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024Lead0.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024Lead0.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023Lead1.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2023 – Jun 30, 2023Lead1.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022Lead2.0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2022 – Jun 30, 2022Lead6.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021Lead0.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2021 – Jun 30, 2021Lead1.0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020Lead1.0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Jun 30, 2020Lead1.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019Lead0.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead1.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017Lead0.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017Lead1.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead2.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead3.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead3.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Jun 30, 1998Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1994 – Dec 31, 1994Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1993 – Dec 31, 1993Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 10 violations since Sep 3, 2016. 1 is health-based, meaning a contaminant or treatment rule was not met. The other 9 concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 10 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 1 health-based (a contaminant above its maximum contaminant level, a disinfectant above its maximum residual level, or a required treatment technique not met), 6 for monitoring or reporting, 3 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements).

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Jul 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019TT · health-basedLead and Copper RuleWQP Entry Point/Tap Treatment Technique Non-Compliance1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Apr 1, 2023MRLead and Copper RuleLead Consumer Notice1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Feb 10, 2022OtherPublic NoticePublic Notification Violation without NPDWR Violation1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action
Jan 1, 2022 – Jun 30, 2022MRLead and Copper RuleWater Quality Parameter M/R1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2020OtherConsumer Confidence RuleConsumer Confidence Report Complete Failure to Report1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020MRLead and Copper RuleWater Quality Parameter M/R1 recordArchived · 3 enforcement actions
Oct 1, 2018MRLead and Copper RuleFollow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/R1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2018OtherConsumer Confidence RuleConsumer Confidence Report Complete Failure to Report1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017MRLead and Copper RuleWater Quality Parameter M/R1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017MRLead and Copper RuleWater Quality Parameter M/R1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Dec 9, 2024 (sanitary survey); 1 visit since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 4 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 14 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records