Tap Water Lookup

EPA system NJ2004002 · New Jersey

Nj American Water - Raritan: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID NJ2004002; community water system; New Jersey; source: surface water; serves 615,430 people via 205,035 connections; status: active

In focus615,430people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 36.1 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.36.1 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled January 2024–October 2024. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Nj American Water - Raritan is a privately owned community water system in New Jersey serving about 615,430 people, matched to 51 ZIP codes.

6.6 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
2 of 2 results at the highest location; highest single sample 7.5 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · at or above the MCL
6.1 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
2 of 2 results at the highest location; highest single sample 6.8 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · at or above the MCL
36.1 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
6 of 18 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
6 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
540 results, 7 entry points
2 at or above an MCL on the average basis
2 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
2 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: Ion exchange (2 of 17 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 17 of 18 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
  • PFOA EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOA at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOA exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFOS EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOS at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOS exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFHxS EPA's 2024 rule cites health effects assessments associating PFHxS with thyroid, liver and immune effects. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 7. PFOA averaged 6.6 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt, and PFOS averaged 6.1 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. EPA's limit applies to a running yearly average and is enforced from 2029. That PFOA result is higher than 96% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it. Lithium reached 36.1 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between January 2024 and October 2024, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 540 samples from 7 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 7 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOA was 6.6 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 7.5 ppt). Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOS was 6.1 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 6.8 ppt). Lithium reached 36.1 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
36.1 ppb
at or above the health reference level
PFOAcomplete-set average
6.6 ppt
at or above the MCL
PFOScomplete-set average
6.1 ppt
at or above the MCL
PFPeAhighest single sample
4.3 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFHxScomplete-set average
3.6 ppt
below the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)
PFHxAhighest single sample
3.6 ppt
below the screening level
PFBAhighest single sample
5.9 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 23 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium18636.1 ppb33.5 ppb (2 of 2)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelJanuary 2024 – October 2024
PFOA1887.5 ppt6.6 ppt (2 of 2)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averageat or above the MCLJanuary 2024 – October 2024
PFOS1836.8 ppt6.1 ppt (2 of 2)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averageat or above the MCLJanuary 2024 – October 2024
PFPeA1834.3 ppt2.2 ppt (2 of 2)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueJanuary 2024 – October 2024
PFHxS1823.6 ppt3.6 ppt (2 of 2)10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)January 2024 – October 2024
PFHxA1813.6 ppt1.8 ppt (2 of 2)3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelJanuary 2024 – October 2024
PFBA1825.9 ppt2.9 ppt (2 of 2)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelJanuary 2024 – October 2024
11Cl-PF3OUdS180< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2024 – October 2024
4:2 FTS180< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2024 – October 2024
6:2 FTS180< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2024 – October 2024
8:2 FTS180< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2024 – October 2024
9Cl-PF3ONS180< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2024 – October 2024
ADONA180< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2024 – October 2024
HFPO-DA (GenX)180< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2024 – October 2024
NEtFOSAA180< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2024 – October 2024
NFDHA180< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2024 – October 2024
NMeFOSAA180< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2024 – October 2024
PFBS180< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2024 – October 2024
PFDA180< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2024 – October 2024
PFDoA180< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2024 – October 2024
PFEESA180< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2024 – October 2024
PFHpA180< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2024 – October 2024
PFHpS180< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2024 – October 2024
PFMBA180< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2024 – October 2024
PFMPA180< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2024 – October 2024
PFNA180< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2024 – October 2024
PFPeS180< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2024 – October 2024
PFTA180< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2024 – October 2024
PFTrDA180< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2024 – October 2024
PFUnA180< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2024 – October 2024
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (25 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Jan 19, 2024Well Road Plant Wells Road Plantground waterLithium30.9 ppb9 ppb
Jan 19, 2024Jerusalem Road Plant Jerusalem Road Plantground waterPFOA5.0 ppt4.0 ppt
Jan 23, 2024Papen Road Plant Papen Road Well Plantground waterPFHxS3.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Jan 23, 2024Papen Road Plant Papen Road Well Plantground waterPFOA4.8 ppt4.0 ppt
Jan 23, 2024Papen Road Plant Papen Road Well Plantground waterLithium26.1 ppb9 ppb
Jan 23, 2024Stony Brook Plant Stony Brook Plantground waterPFOA7.5 ppt4.0 ppt
Jan 23, 2024Stony Brook Plant Stony Brook Plantground waterPFOS6.8 ppt4.0 ppt
Jun 19, 2024Springfield Plant Springfield Plantground waterLithium21.3 ppb9 ppb
Jul 30, 2024Raritan-Millstone Plant Raritan Millstone Water Treatment Plantsurface waterPFOA4.2 ppt4.0 ppt
Jul 30, 2024Raritan-Millstone Plant Raritan Millstone Water Treatment Plantsurface waterPFPeA3.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 30, 2024Canal Road Plant Canal Road WTPsurface waterPFOA4.2 ppt4.0 ppt
Jul 30, 2024Canal Road Plant Canal Road WTPsurface waterPFPeA3.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 21, 2024Papen Road Plant Papen Road Well Plantground waterPFHxS3.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 21, 2024Papen Road Plant Papen Road Well Plantground waterPFOA4.6 ppt4.0 ppt
Aug 21, 2024Papen Road Plant Papen Road Well Plantground waterLithium30 ppb9 ppb
Aug 21, 2024Well Road Plant Wells Road Plantground waterLithium36.1 ppb9 ppb
Aug 21, 2024Jerusalem Road Plant Jerusalem Road Plantground waterPFBA5.7 ppt5.0 ppt
Aug 21, 2024Jerusalem Road Plant Jerusalem Road Plantground waterPFHxA3.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 21, 2024Jerusalem Road Plant Jerusalem Road Plantground waterPFOA6.0 ppt4.0 ppt
Aug 21, 2024Jerusalem Road Plant Jerusalem Road Plantground waterPFOS4.1 ppt4.0 ppt
Aug 21, 2024Jerusalem Road Plant Jerusalem Road Plantground waterPFPeA4.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 21, 2024Springfield Plant Springfield Plantground waterPFBA5.9 ppt5.0 ppt
Aug 21, 2024Springfield Plant Springfield Plantground waterLithium21.5 ppb9 ppb
Aug 27, 2024Stony Brook Plant Stony Brook Plantground waterPFOA5.7 ppt4.0 ppt
Aug 27, 2024Stony Brook Plant Stony Brook Plantground waterPFOS5.3 ppt4.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 17 of 18 sampling events, not known at 1 of 18 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: not known at 18 of 18 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 15 of 17 sampling events, ion exchange at 2 of 17 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 2 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. The action level has been reached in 1 of the 22 periods on record.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013: 3 ppbJan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016: 4 ppbJan 1, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017: 2 ppbJul 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017: 3 ppbJan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018: 3 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019: 2 ppbJan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020: 2 ppbJan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021: 3 ppbJan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022: 2 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023: 2 ppbJan 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024: 2 ppbJan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025: 2 ppbDec 31, 2013Dec 31, 20252 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 2 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb; 1 of the 22 monitoring periods on record reached the action level. The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 22 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead14 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Jun 30, 1997Lead11 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead15 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 2 violations since Sep 3, 2016. None is health-based. All concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices, not the water itself.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 2 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 2 for monitoring or reporting, none health-based.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Oct 1, 2017 – Oct 31, 2017MRInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
May 25, 2017MRE. ColiMonitoring, Source Water (GWR)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Jun 18, 2024 (sanitary survey); 1 visit since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 6 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Filters certified for lead reduction

1 of this utility's 22 lead monitoring periods on record reached the 15 ppb action level (most recent 90th percentile 2 ppb).

NSF/ANSI 53 with a lead-reduction claim, or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. Lead comes from plumbing, so a point-of-use filter at the kitchen tap is the relevant type.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 36.1 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records