Tap Water Lookup

EPA system NY2902835 · New York

Liberty Utilities New York - Lynbrook: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID NY2902835; community water system; New York; source: groundwater; serves 220,000 people via 74,634 connections; status: active

In focus220,000people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 14.9 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.14.9 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled April 2023–July 2025. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Liberty Utilities New York - Lynbrook is a privately owned community water system in New York serving about 220,000 people, matched to 18 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
35 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
2.6 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
2 of 2 results at the highest location; highest single sample 5.1 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · below the MCL
14.9 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
1 of 35 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
3 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
1,050 results, 18 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
4.2 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Jun 30, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
3
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
3 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (36 of 36 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 36 of 36 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
  • PFOS EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOS at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOS exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFHxS EPA's 2024 rule cites health effects assessments associating PFHxS with thyroid, liver and immune effects. EPA source
  • PFNA EPA's 2024 rule cites health effects assessments associating PFNA with developmental, liver and immune effects. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 4. PFOS averaged 2.6 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. That PFOS result is higher than 90% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it. Lithium reached 14.9 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between April 2023 and August 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 1,050 samples from 18 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 4 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOS was 2.6 ppt, below the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 5.1 ppt). Lithium reached 14.9 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
14.9 ppb
at or above the health reference level
PFOScomplete-set average
2.6 ppt
below the MCL
PFHxScomplete-set average
3.2 ppt
below the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)
PFNAcomplete-set average
2.1 ppt
below the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)
Show the 26 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium35114.9 ppb7.5 ppb (2 of 2)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelApril 2023 – July 2025
PFOS3515.1 ppt2.6 ppt (2 of 2)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the MCLApril 2023 – July 2025
PFHxS3526.3 ppt3.2 ppt (2 of 2)10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)April 2023 – July 2025
PFNA3514.1 ppt2.1 ppt (2 of 2)10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)April 2023 – July 2025
11Cl-PF3OUdS350< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – July 2025
4:2 FTS350< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – July 2025
6:2 FTS350< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – July 2025
8:2 FTS350< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – July 2025
9Cl-PF3ONS350< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – July 2025
ADONA350< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – July 2025
HFPO-DA (GenX)350< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – July 2025
NEtFOSAA350< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – August 2025
NFDHA350< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – July 2025
NMeFOSAA350< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – August 2025
PFBA350< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – July 2025
PFBS350< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – July 2025
PFDA350< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – July 2025
PFDoA350< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – July 2025
PFEESA350< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – July 2025
PFHpA350< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – July 2025
PFHpS350< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – July 2025
PFHxA350< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – July 2025
PFMBA350< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – July 2025
PFMPA350< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – July 2025
PFOA350< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – July 2025
PFPeA350< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – July 2025
PFPeS350< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – July 2025
PFTA350< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – August 2025
PFTrDA350< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – August 2025
PFUnA350< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – July 2025
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (5 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Jul 13, 2023Station #6 - Treated Well 6-1 Treatmentground waterLithium14.9 ppb9 ppb
Feb 7, 2024Station #23 - Treated Wells 23-1 & 23-2 Treatmentground waterPFHxS3.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Mar 1, 2024Station #5 - Treated Well 5-R Treatmentground waterPFHxS6.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Mar 1, 2024Station #5 - Treated Well 5-R Treatmentground waterPFNA4.1 ppt4.0 ppt
Mar 1, 2024Station #5 - Treated Well 5-R Treatmentground waterPFOS5.1 ppt4.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 36 of 36 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: not known at 36 of 36 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 36 of 36 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Jun 30, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 4.2 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 16 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002: 3 ppbJan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005: 3 ppbJan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006: 8 ppbJan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008: 3 ppbJan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011: 6 ppbJan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014: 3.8 ppbJan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017: 3 ppbJan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2020: 3.2 ppbJul 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023: 3.8 ppbJan 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024: 7 ppbJul 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024: 3 ppbJan 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2025: 4.2 ppbDec 31, 2002Jun 30, 20254.2 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Jun 30, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 4.2 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (16 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2025Lead4.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023Lead3.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2020Lead3.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014Lead3.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 16 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2025Lead4.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023Lead3.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2020Lead3.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014Lead3.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000Lead5.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead4.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 3 violations since Sep 3, 2016. 3 are health-based, meaning a contaminant or treatment rule was not met.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 3 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 3 health-based (a contaminant above its maximum contaminant level, a disinfectant above its maximum residual level, or a required treatment technique not met).

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Jul 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024TT · health-basedLead and Copper RuleWQP Entry Point/Tap Treatment Technique Non-Compliance1 recordResolved · 5 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024TT · health-basedLead and Copper RuleWQP Entry Point/Tap Treatment Technique Non-Compliance1 recordResolved · 5 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023TT · health-basedLead and Copper RuleWQP Entry Point/Tap Treatment Technique Non-Compliance1 recordResolved · 5 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Jul 26, 2023 (sanitary survey); 1 visit since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 3 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 14.9 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records