Tap Water Lookup

EPA system OH3102612 · Ohio

Cincinnati Public Water System: PFOS at or above EPA's 4.0 ppt limit

System ID OH3102612; community water system; Ohio; source: surface water; serves 750,200 people via 244,716 connections; status: active

In focus750,200people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referencePFOS
PFOS: 5.2 ppt; MCL 4.0 ppt. highest complete sampling-location average.5.2 pptMCL: 4.0 ppt

highest complete sampling-location average; sampled May 2023–February 2024. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Cincinnati Public Water System is a local-government-owned community water system in Ohio serving about 750,200 people, matched to 58 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
6 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
5.2 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
2 of 2 results at the highest location; highest single sample 6.1 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · at or above the MCL
< 9 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
6 samples, none above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · not detected above the reporting level
3 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
180 results, 2 entry points
1 at or above an MCL on the average basis
2.1 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Jun 30, 2026
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
0 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (6 of 6 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 6 of 6 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • PFOS EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOS at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOS exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFBS EPA's 2021 PFBS toxicity assessment cites thyroid, kidney and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source
  • PFBA EPA's 2022 IRIS assessment for PFBA cites thyroid, liver and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 3. PFOS averaged 5.2 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. EPA's limit applies to a running yearly average and is enforced from 2029. That PFOS result is higher than 93% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it.

Between May 2023 and February 2024, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 180 samples from 2 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 3 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOS was 5.2 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 6.1 ppt).

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
PFOScomplete-set average
5.2 ppt
at or above the MCL
PFBShighest single sample
4.1 ppt
below the health-based water concentration
PFBAhighest single sample
5.2 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 27 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Lithiumnot detected · reporting level 9 ppb
< 9 ppb
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
PFOS626.1 ppt5.2 ppt (2 of 2)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averageat or above the MCLMay 2023 – February 2024
PFBS624.1 ppt3.9 ppt (2 of 2)2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplebelow the health-based water concentrationMay 2023 – February 2024
PFBA625.2 ppt5.2 ppt (2 of 2)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelMay 2023 – February 2024
11Cl-PF3OUdS60< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
4:2 FTS60< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
6:2 FTS60< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
8:2 FTS60< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
9Cl-PF3ONS60< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
ADONA60< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
HFPO-DA (GenX)60< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
Lithium60< 9 ppb10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
NEtFOSAA60< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
NFDHA60< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
NMeFOSAA60< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
PFDA60< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
PFDoA60< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
PFEESA60< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
PFHpA60< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
PFHpS60< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
PFHxA60< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
PFHxS60< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
PFMBA60< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
PFMPA60< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
PFNA60< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
PFOA60< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
PFPeA60< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
PFPeS60< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
PFTA60< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
PFTrDA60< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
PFUnA60< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2023 – February 2024
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (6 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Jun 22, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Bolton Plant (54745)ground waterPFBA5.2 ppt5.0 ppt
Jun 22, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Bolton Plant (54745)ground waterPFBS3.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 22, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Bolton Plant (54745)ground waterPFOS4.2 ppt4.0 ppt
Nov 6, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Bolton Plant (54745)ground waterPFBA5.1 ppt5.0 ppt
Nov 6, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Bolton Plant (54745)ground waterPFBS4.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Nov 6, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Bolton Plant (54745)ground waterPFOS6.1 ppt4.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 6 of 6 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: yes at 6 of 6 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 6 of 6 sampling events.

Lead and copper at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Jun 30, 2026, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 2.1 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. The action level has been reached in 1 of the 58 periods on record.

Action level 15 ppb015Jul 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020: 6 ppbJan 1, 2021 – Jun 30, 2021: 3.3 ppbJul 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021: 7.7 ppbJan 1, 2022 – Jun 30, 2022: 4.0 ppbJul 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022: 3.4 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Jun 30, 2023: 3.4 ppbJul 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023: 2.8 ppbJan 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024: 1.1 ppbJul 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024: 2.3 ppbJan 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2025: 1.4 ppbJul 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025: 1.9 ppbJan 1, 2026 – Jun 30, 2026: 2.1 ppbDec 31, 2020Jun 30, 20262.1 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Jun 30, 2026, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 2.1 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb; 1 of the 58 monitoring periods on record reached the action level. 4 further records are excluded here as censored or implausible in EPA's database. The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2026 – Jun 30, 2026Lead2.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead1.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2025Lead1.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024Lead2.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024Lead1.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023Lead2.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2023 – Jun 30, 2023Lead3.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022Lead3.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2022 – Jun 30, 2022Lead4.0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021Lead7.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2021 – Jun 30, 2021Lead3.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 61 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2026 – Jun 30, 2026Lead2.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead1.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2025Lead1.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024Lead2.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024Lead1.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023Lead2.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2023 – Jun 30, 2023Lead3.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022Lead3.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2022 – Jun 30, 2022Lead4.0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021Lead7.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2021 – Jun 30, 2021Lead3.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Jun 30, 2020Lead4.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019Lead12.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Jun 30, 2019Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead7.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Jun 30, 2018Lead5.0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017Lead4.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016Lead8.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Jun 30, 2016Lead6.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2015Lead8.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Jun 30, 2015Lead4.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2014Lead9.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Jun 30, 2014Lead3.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013Lead5.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Jun 30, 2013Lead2.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2012Lead5.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Jun 30, 2012Lead3.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011Lead4.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Jun 30, 2011Lead5.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010Lead5.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010Lead3.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009Lead3.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2009 – Jun 30, 2009Lead3.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008Lead4.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Jun 30, 2008Lead4.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007Lead8.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Jun 30, 2007Lead3.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Jun 30, 2006Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005Copper37,600 ppb1,300 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005Lead7,300 ppb15 ppbnot comparable: the recorded value is implausible for its reported unit (value implausible for the reported unit)
Jan 1, 2005 – Jun 30, 2005Copper33,200 ppb1,300 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Jun 30, 2005Lead4,700 ppb15 ppbnot comparable: the recorded value is implausible for its reported unit (value implausible for the reported unit)
Jul 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004Copper21,200 ppb1,300 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004Lead8,100 ppb15 ppbnot comparable: the recorded value is implausible for its reported unit (value implausible for the reported unit)
Jan 1, 2004 – Jun 30, 2004Lead4.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003Lead9.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Jun 30, 2003Lead3.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Jun 30, 2002Lead4.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead7.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Jun 30, 2001Lead4.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000Lead8.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Jun 30, 2000Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead4.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Jun 30, 1999Lead4.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead15.1 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997Lead13 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Jun 30, 1997Lead9.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead7.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists no drinking-water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.

EPA's SDWIS database lists no drinking water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.

None on file.

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Apr 11, 2025 (reason not recorded); 3 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 3 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Filters certified for lead reduction

1 of this utility's 58 lead monitoring periods on record reached the 15 ppb action level (most recent 90th percentile 2.1 ppb).

NSF/ANSI 53 with a lead-reduction claim, or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. Lead comes from plumbing, so a point-of-use filter at the kitchen tap is the relevant type.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records