Tap Water Lookup

EPA system OH4801411 · Ohio

Toledo City of: 1 PFAS found; PFBA up to 5.0 ppt, below the 6,000 ppt screening level

System ID OH4801411; community water system; Ohio; source: surface water; serves 360,000 people via 130,000 connections; status: active

In focus360,000people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referencePFBA
PFBA: 5.0 ppt; screening level 6,000 ppt. highest single sample.5.0 pptscreening level: 6,000 ppt

highest single sample; sampled June 2024–March 2025. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Toledo City of is a local-government-owned community water system in Ohio serving about 360,000 people, matched to 30 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
4 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
4 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 9 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
4 samples, none above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · not detected above the reporting level
1 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
120 results, 1 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
0 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
1
health-based violation since Sep 3, 2016
4 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (4 of 4 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 4 of 4 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • PFBA EPA's 2022 IRIS assessment for PFBA cites thyroid, liver and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 1.

Between June 2024 and March 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 120 samples from 1 sampling location for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 1 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
PFBAhighest single sample
5.0 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 29 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Lithiumnot detected · reporting level 9 ppb
< 9 ppb
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
PFBA415.0 ppt1.3 ppt (4 of 4)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelJune 2024 – March 2025
11Cl-PF3OUdS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
4:2 FTS40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
6:2 FTS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
8:2 FTS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
9Cl-PF3ONS40< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
ADONA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
HFPO-DA (GenX)40< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
Lithium40< 9 ppb10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
NEtFOSAA40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
NFDHA40< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
NMeFOSAA40< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFBS40< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFDA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFDoA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFEESA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFHpA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFHpS40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFHxA40< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFHxS40< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFMBA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFMPA40< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFNA40< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFOA40< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFOS40< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFPeA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFPeS40< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFTA40< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFTrDA40< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFUnA40< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (1 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Jun 3, 2024Finished Water Tap Treatment Plantsurface waterPFBA5.0 ppt5.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 4 of 4 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 4 of 4 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 4 of 4 sampling events.

Lead and copper at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 0 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 23 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010: 6 ppbJan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011: 0 ppbJan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014: 0 ppbJan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017: 0 ppbJan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018: 0 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019: 0 ppbJan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020: 0 ppbJul 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021: 0 ppbJan 1, 2022 – Jun 30, 2022: 0 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023: 0 ppbJan 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024: 0 ppbJan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025: 0 ppbDec 31, 2010Dec 31, 20250 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 0 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (23 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). 1 further record is excluded here as censored or implausible in EPA's database. The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2022 – Jun 30, 2022Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 25 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2022 – Jun 30, 2022Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2005 – Sep 30, 2005Copper20,000 ppb1,300 ppbat or above the action level
Jun 1, 2005 – Sep 30, 2005Lead5,000 ppb15 ppbnot comparable: the recorded value is implausible for its reported unit (value implausible for the reported unit)
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Jun 30, 1999Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Jun 30, 1997Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Jun 30, 1993Lead13 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead11 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 4 violations since Sep 3, 2016. 1 is health-based, meaning a contaminant or treatment rule was not met. The other 3 concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 4 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 1 health-based (a contaminant above its maximum contaminant level, a disinfectant above its maximum residual level, or a required treatment technique not met), 2 for monitoring or reporting, 1 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements).

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Mar 1, 2023 – Mar 31, 2023TT · health-basedInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleMonthly Turbidity Exceed (Enhanced SWTR)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Jul 2, 2025RPTLead and Copper Rule RevisionsNotification, Known or Potential LSL1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Jan 25, 2024OtherConsumer Confidence RuleConsumer Confidence Report Inadequate Reporting1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2022 – Mar 31, 2022MRTotal Haloacetic Acids (Haa5)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Sep 4, 2025 (reason not recorded); 5 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 1 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records