Tap Water Lookup

EPA system PA7360058 · Pennsylvania

City of Lancaster: PFOA at or above EPA's 4.0 ppt limit

System ID PA7360058; community water system; Pennsylvania; source: surface water; serves 120,000 people via 49,376 connections; status: active

In focus120,000people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referencePFOA
PFOA: 14.7 ppt; MCL 4.0 ppt. highest complete sampling-location average.14.7 pptMCL: 4.0 ppt

highest complete sampling-location average; sampled December 2023–September 2024. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

City of Lancaster is a local-government-owned community water system in Pennsylvania serving about 120,000 people, matched to 16 ZIP codes.

14.7 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
4 of 4 results at the highest location; highest single sample 23.8 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · at or above the MCL
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
8 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 9 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
8 samples, none above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · not detected above the reporting level
6 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
240 results, 2 entry points
1 at or above an MCL on the average basis
7 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Sep 30, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
2
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
4 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (8 of 8 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 8 of 8 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • PFOA EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOA at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOA exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFHxA EPA's 2023 IRIS assessment for PFHxA cites developmental, liver and blood effects in animal studies. EPA source
  • PFBS EPA's 2021 PFBS toxicity assessment cites thyroid, kidney and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source
  • PFBA EPA's 2022 IRIS assessment for PFBA cites thyroid, liver and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 6. PFOA averaged 14.7 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. EPA's limit applies to a running yearly average and is enforced from 2029. That PFOA result is higher than 99.3% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it.

Between December 2023 and September 2024, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 240 samples from 2 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 6 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOA was 14.7 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 23.8 ppt).

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
PFPeAhighest single sample
22.3 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFOAcomplete-set average
14.7 ppt
at or above the MCL
PFHpAhighest single sample
8.1 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFHxAhighest single sample
28.8 ppt
below the screening level
PFBShighest single sample
9.8 ppt
below the health-based water concentration
PFBAhighest single sample
15.4 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 24 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Lithiumnot detected · reporting level 9 ppb
< 9 ppb
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
PFPeA8422.3 ppt12.7 ppt (4 of 4)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueDecember 2023 – September 2024
PFOA8423.8 ppt14.7 ppt (4 of 4)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averageat or above the MCLDecember 2023 – September 2024
PFHpA848.1 ppt5.1 ppt (4 of 4)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueDecember 2023 – September 2024
PFHxA8428.8 ppt16.7 ppt (4 of 4)3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
PFBS849.8 ppt6.3 ppt (4 of 4)2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplebelow the health-based water concentrationDecember 2023 – September 2024
PFBA8315.4 ppt8.9 ppt (4 of 4)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
11Cl-PF3OUdS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
4:2 FTS80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
6:2 FTS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
8:2 FTS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
9Cl-PF3ONS80< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
ADONA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
HFPO-DA (GenX)80< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
Lithium80< 9 ppb10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
NEtFOSAA80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
NFDHA80< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
NMeFOSAA80< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
PFDA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
PFDoA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
PFEESA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
PFHpS80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
PFHxS80< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
PFMBA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
PFMPA80< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
PFNA80< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
PFOS80< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
PFPeS80< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
PFTA80< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
PFTrDA80< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
PFUnA80< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelDecember 2023 – September 2024
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (23 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Dec 6, 2023Entry Point 102 Finished Water Conestoga Tpsurface waterPFBA10.0 ppt5.0 ppt
Dec 6, 2023Entry Point 102 Finished Water Conestoga Tpsurface waterPFBS5.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 6, 2023Entry Point 102 Finished Water Conestoga Tpsurface waterPFHpA5.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 6, 2023Entry Point 102 Finished Water Conestoga Tpsurface waterPFHxA18.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 6, 2023Entry Point 102 Finished Water Conestoga Tpsurface waterPFOA14.1 ppt4.0 ppt
Dec 6, 2023Entry Point 102 Finished Water Conestoga Tpsurface waterPFPeA12.8 ppt3.0 ppt
Mar 6, 2024Entry Point 102 Finished Water Conestoga Tpsurface waterPFBS4.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Mar 6, 2024Entry Point 102 Finished Water Conestoga Tpsurface waterPFHpA3.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Mar 6, 2024Entry Point 102 Finished Water Conestoga Tpsurface waterPFHxA8.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Mar 6, 2024Entry Point 102 Finished Water Conestoga Tpsurface waterPFOA9.5 ppt4.0 ppt
Mar 6, 2024Entry Point 102 Finished Water Conestoga Tpsurface waterPFPeA6.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 6, 2024Entry Point 102 Finished Water Conestoga Tpsurface waterPFBA10.1 ppt5.0 ppt
Jun 6, 2024Entry Point 102 Finished Water Conestoga Tpsurface waterPFBS5.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 6, 2024Entry Point 102 Finished Water Conestoga Tpsurface waterPFHpA3.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 6, 2024Entry Point 102 Finished Water Conestoga Tpsurface waterPFHxA11.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 6, 2024Entry Point 102 Finished Water Conestoga Tpsurface waterPFOA11.2 ppt4.0 ppt
Jun 6, 2024Entry Point 102 Finished Water Conestoga Tpsurface waterPFPeA8.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 5, 2024Entry Point 102 Finished Water Conestoga Tpsurface waterPFBA15.4 ppt5.0 ppt
Sep 5, 2024Entry Point 102 Finished Water Conestoga Tpsurface waterPFBS9.8 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 5, 2024Entry Point 102 Finished Water Conestoga Tpsurface waterPFHpA8.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 5, 2024Entry Point 102 Finished Water Conestoga Tpsurface waterPFHxA28.8 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 5, 2024Entry Point 102 Finished Water Conestoga Tpsurface waterPFOA23.8 ppt4.0 ppt
Sep 5, 2024Entry Point 102 Finished Water Conestoga Tpsurface waterPFPeA22.3 ppt3.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 8 of 8 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 8 of 8 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 8 of 8 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Sep 30, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 7 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. The action level has been reached in 2 of the 14 periods on record.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998: 13 ppbJan 1, 1999 – Jun 30, 1999: 8.2 ppbJul 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000: 2 ppbJan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001: 7 ppbJan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004: 7.6 ppbJan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007: 3.5 ppbJan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010: 4.8 ppbJun 1, 2013 – Sep 30, 2013: 4.5 ppbJun 1, 2016 – Sep 30, 2016: 6 ppbJun 1, 2019 – Sep 30, 2019: 5.7 ppbJun 1, 2022 – Sep 30, 2022: 9.9 ppbJun 1, 2025 – Sep 30, 2025: 7 ppbDec 31, 1998Sep 30, 20257 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Sep 30, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 7 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb; 2 of the 14 monitoring periods on record reached the action level. The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jun 1, 2025 – Sep 30, 2025Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2022 – Sep 30, 2022Lead9.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2019 – Sep 30, 2019Lead5.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2016 – Sep 30, 2016Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2013 – Sep 30, 2013Lead4.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010Lead4.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007Lead3.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004Lead7.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Jun 30, 1999Lead8.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead13 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 14 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jun 1, 2025 – Sep 30, 2025Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2022 – Sep 30, 2022Lead9.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2019 – Sep 30, 2019Lead5.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2016 – Sep 30, 2016Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2013 – Sep 30, 2013Lead4.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010Lead4.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007Lead3.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004Lead7.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Jun 30, 1999Lead8.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead13 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead25 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead41 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 4 violations since Sep 3, 2016. 2 are health-based, meaning a contaminant or treatment rule was not met. The other 2 concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 4 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 2 health-based (a contaminant above its maximum contaminant level, a disinfectant above its maximum residual level, or a required treatment technique not met), 2 for monitoring or reporting.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Apr 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024MCL · health-basedTthm (0.083 MG/L, limit 0.080 mg/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Oct 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016MCL · health-basedTotal Haloacetic Acids (Haa5)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
May 1, 2025 – May 31, 2025MRSurface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Filter)1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Sep 1, 2024 – Sep 30, 2024MRSurface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Filter)1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Apr 15, 2025 (sanitary survey); 2 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 6 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Filters certified for lead reduction

2 of this utility's 14 lead monitoring periods on record reached the 15 ppb action level (most recent 90th percentile 7 ppb).

NSF/ANSI 53 with a lead-reduction claim, or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. Lead comes from plumbing, so a point-of-use filter at the kitchen tap is the relevant type.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records