Tap Water Lookup

EPA system PA7670100 · Pennsylvania

York Water Co: No PFAS or lithium found in EPA testing

System ID PA7670100; community water system; Pennsylvania; source: surface water; serves 206,762 people via 68,414 connections; status: active

In focus206,762people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLead, 90th percentile at customer taps
Lead, 90th percentile at customer taps: 3 ppb; action level 15 ppb. 90th percentile for the latest monitoring period.3 ppbaction level: 15 ppb

90th percentile for the latest monitoring period; sampled Sep 30, 2025. Source: EPA SDWIS/ECHO.

York Water Co is a privately owned community water system in Pennsylvania serving about 206,762 people, matched to 30 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
4 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
4 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 9 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
4 samples, none above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · not detected above the reporting level
0 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
120 results, 1 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
3 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Sep 30, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
1
health-based violation since Sep 3, 2016
8 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (4 of 4 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 4 of 4 sampling events

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found none of them at levels its laboratories can measure.

Between February 2025 and November 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 120 samples from 1 sampling location for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). None were found above their minimum reporting levels.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
No contaminant was detected above its reporting level.
Show the 30 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Lithiumnot detected · reporting level 9 ppb
< 9 ppb
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
11Cl-PF3OUdS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
4:2 FTS40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
6:2 FTS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
8:2 FTS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
9Cl-PF3ONS40< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
ADONA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
HFPO-DA (GenX)40< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
Lithium40< 9 ppb10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
NEtFOSAA40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
NFDHA40< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
NMeFOSAA40< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
PFBA40< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
PFBS40< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
PFDA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
PFDoA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
PFEESA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
PFHpA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
PFHpS40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
PFHxA40< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
PFHxS40< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
PFMBA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
PFMPA40< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
PFNA40< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
PFOA40< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
PFOS40< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
PFPeA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
PFPeS40< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
PFTA40< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
PFTrDA40< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
PFUnA40< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2025 – November 2025
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 4 of 4 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 4 of 4 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 4 of 4 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Sep 30, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 3 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. The action level has been reached in 2 of the 16 periods on record.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001: 2 ppbJan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004: 5 ppbJan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007: 2 ppbJan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010: 2.8 ppbJun 1, 2013 – Sep 30, 2013: 2 ppbJun 1, 2016 – Sep 30, 2016: 16 ppbJan 1, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017: 8.1 ppbJul 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017: 9.4 ppbJun 1, 2018 – Sep 30, 2018: 8.5 ppbJun 1, 2019 – Sep 30, 2019: 3.5 ppbJun 1, 2022 – Sep 30, 2022: 2 ppbJun 1, 2025 – Sep 30, 2025: 3 ppbDec 31, 2001Sep 30, 20253 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Sep 30, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 3 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb; 2 of the 16 monitoring periods on record reached the action level (1 within the last 10 years). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jun 1, 2025 – Sep 30, 2025Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2022 – Sep 30, 2022Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2019 – Sep 30, 2019Lead3.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2018 – Sep 30, 2018Lead8.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017Lead9.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017Lead8.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2016 – Sep 30, 2016Lead16 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jun 1, 2013 – Sep 30, 2013Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010Lead2.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 16 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jun 1, 2025 – Sep 30, 2025Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2022 – Sep 30, 2022Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2019 – Sep 30, 2019Lead3.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2018 – Sep 30, 2018Lead8.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017Lead9.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017Lead8.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jun 1, 2016 – Sep 30, 2016Lead16 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jun 1, 2013 – Sep 30, 2013Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010Lead2.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead5.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead17 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 8 violations since Sep 3, 2016. 1 is health-based, meaning a contaminant or treatment rule was not met. The other 7 concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices. 1 is still open.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 8 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 1 health-based (a contaminant above its maximum contaminant level, a disinfectant above its maximum residual level, or a required treatment technique not met), 7 for monitoring or reporting; 1 is not yet resolved.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Jul 1, 2022 – Jul 31, 2022MCL · health-basedRevised Total Coliform RuleMaximum Contaminant Level Violation, E. coli (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jul 11, 2025RPTRevised Total Coliform RuleReport Sample Result/Fail Monitor (RTCR)1 recordUnaddressed · 1 enforcement action
Jul 1, 2024 – Sep 30, 2024MRCarbon, TotalMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Oct 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022MRCarbon, TotalMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action
Jul 1, 2022 – Jul 31, 2022MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Oct 1, 2019 – Oct 31, 2019MRInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR)1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Sep 1, 2019 – Sep 30, 2019MRInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR)1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Apr 1, 2018 – Jun 30, 2018MRCarbon, TotalMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Apr 1, 2026 (sanitary survey); 2 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified for lead reduction

2 of this utility's 16 lead monitoring periods on record reached the 15 ppb action level (most recent 90th percentile 3 ppb).

NSF/ANSI 53 with a lead-reduction claim, or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. Lead comes from plumbing, so a point-of-use filter at the kitchen tap is the relevant type.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records