Tap Water Lookup

EPA system TN0000349 · Tennessee

Kingsport Water Dept: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID TN0000349; community water system; Tennessee; source: surface water; serves 107,739 people via 46,240 connections; status: active

In focus107,739people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 76.6 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.76.6 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled February 2023–October 2023. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Kingsport Water Dept is a local-government-owned community water system in Tennessee serving about 107,739 people, matched to 12 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
12 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
1.5 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
4 of 4 results at the highest location; highest single sample 5.9 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · below the MCL
76.6 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
3 of 12 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
1 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
360 results, 3 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
1 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
1 violation in total

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
  • PFOS EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOS at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOS exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 2. PFOS averaged 1.5 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. That PFOS result is higher than 88% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it. Lithium reached 76.6 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between February 2023 and November 2023, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 360 samples from 3 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 2 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOS was 1.5 ppt, below the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 5.9 ppt). Lithium reached 76.6 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
76.6 ppb
at or above the health reference level
PFOScomplete-set average
1.5 ppt
below the MCL
Show the 28 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium12376.6 ppb19.2 ppb (4 of 4)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
PFOS1215.9 ppt1.5 ppt (4 of 4)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the MCLFebruary 2023 – November 2023
11Cl-PF3OUdS120< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
4:2 FTS120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
6:2 FTS120< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
8:2 FTS120< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
9Cl-PF3ONS120< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
ADONA120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
HFPO-DA (GenX)120< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
NEtFOSAA120< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
NFDHA120< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
NMeFOSAA120< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
PFBA120< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFBS120< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFDA120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFDoA120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFEESA120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFHpA120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFHpS120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFHxA120< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFHxS120< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFMBA120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFMPA120< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFNA120< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFOA120< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFPeA120< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFPeS120< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFTA120< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
PFTrDA120< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – October 2023
PFUnA120< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (4 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Jul 17, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Johnson City WD Connectionsurface waterPFOS5.9 ppt4.0 ppt
Jul 17, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Johnson City WD Connectionsurface waterLithium76.6 ppb9 ppb
Jul 17, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Bloomingdale Connectionsurface waterLithium24.9 ppb9 ppb
Jul 17, 2023Entry Point A South Holston River Plantsurface waterLithium44 ppb9 ppb

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: no at 12 of 12 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 12 of 12 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 1 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 10 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992: 14 ppbJul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992: 10 ppbJan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004: 3.1 ppbJan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007: 1.5 ppbJan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010: 2.4 ppbJan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013: 1.8 ppbJan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016: 3.5 ppbJan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019: 2.2 ppbJan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022: 1 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025: 1 ppbJun 30, 1992Dec 31, 20251 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 1 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (10 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019Lead2.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead3.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead1.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead2.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead1.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead3.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead14 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 1 violation since Sep 3, 2016. None is health-based. All concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices, not the water itself. 1 is still open.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 1 violation recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 1 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements), none health-based; 1 is not yet resolved.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Jul 1, 2023OtherConsumer Confidence RuleConsumer Confidence Report Inadequate Reporting1 recordUnaddressed · 1 enforcement action

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Aug 26, 2025 (sanitary survey); 2 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 1 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 76.6 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records