Tap Water Lookup

EPA system TX0140006 · Texas

City of Killeen: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID TX0140006; community water system; Texas; source: purchased surface water; serves 161,027 people via 55,166 connections; status: active

In focus161,027people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 20.6 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.20.6 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled March 2025–December 2025. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

City of Killeen is a local-government-owned community water system in Texas serving about 161,027 people, matched to 4 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
8 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
8 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
20.6 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
3 of 8 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
3 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
240 results, 2 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
1 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
1 violation in total

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
  • PFBS EPA's 2021 PFBS toxicity assessment cites thyroid, kidney and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source
  • PFBA EPA's 2022 IRIS assessment for PFBA cites thyroid, liver and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 4. Lithium reached 20.6 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between March 2025 and December 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 240 samples from 2 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 4 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Lithium reached 20.6 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
20.6 ppb
at or above the health reference level
PFPeAhighest single sample
3.5 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFBShighest single sample
3.0 ppt
below the health-based water concentration
PFBAhighest single sample
7.3 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 26 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium8320.6 ppb13.9 ppb (4 of 4)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFPeA833.5 ppt2.5 ppt (4 of 4)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFBS813.0 ppt0.8 ppt (4 of 4)2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplebelow the health-based water concentrationMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFBA847.3 ppt3.4 ppt (4 of 4)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
11Cl-PF3OUdS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
4:2 FTS80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
6:2 FTS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
8:2 FTS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
9Cl-PF3ONS80< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
ADONA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
HFPO-DA (GenX)80< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
NEtFOSAA80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
NFDHA80< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
NMeFOSAA80< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFDA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFDoA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFEESA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFHpA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFHpS80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFHxA80< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFHxS80< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFMBA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFMPA80< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFNA80< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFOA80< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFOS80< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFPeS80< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFTA80< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFTrDA80< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
PFUnA80< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMarch 2025 – December 2025
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (11 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Mar 3, 2025Sample Sink Chaparral Estsurface waterPFPeA3.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Mar 3, 2025Sample Sink Chaparral Estsurface waterLithium20.6 ppb9 ppb
Jun 2, 2025Sample Sink Chaparral Estsurface waterPFBS3.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 2, 2025Sample Sink Chaparral Estsurface waterPFPeA3.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 2, 2025Sample Sink Chaparral Estsurface waterLithium17.7 ppb9 ppb
Sep 2, 2025Sample Sink Pump Station #6surface waterPFBA6.1 ppt5.0 ppt
Sep 2, 2025Sample Sink Chaparral Estsurface waterPFBA6.3 ppt5.0 ppt
Sep 2, 2025Sample Sink Chaparral Estsurface waterPFPeA3.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 2, 2025Sample Sink Chaparral Estsurface waterLithium17.1 ppb9 ppb
Dec 1, 2025Sample Sink Pump Station #6surface waterPFBA7.1 ppt5.0 ppt
Dec 1, 2025Sample Sink Chaparral Estsurface waterPFBA7.3 ppt5.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: not known at 8 of 8 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 8 of 8 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 1 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 13 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992: 3.1 ppbJan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995: 2.3 ppbJan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1996: 3.4 ppbJan 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1999: 2.6 ppbJan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2002: 1.8 ppbJan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005: 1.3 ppbJan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012: 2.1 ppbJan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016: 0 ppbJan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019: 0 ppbJul 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021: 0 ppbJan 1, 2022 – Jun 30, 2022: 0 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025: 1 ppbDec 31, 1992Dec 31, 20251 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 1 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (13 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2022 – Jun 30, 2022Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead2.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead1.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2002Lead1.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1999Lead2.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1996Lead3.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995Lead2.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead3.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 13 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2022 – Jun 30, 2022Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead2.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead1.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2002Lead1.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1999Lead2.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1996Lead3.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995Lead2.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead3.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead6.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 1 violation since Sep 3, 2016. None is health-based. All concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices, not the water itself.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 1 violation recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 1 for monitoring or reporting, none health-based.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Jan 1, 2022 – Jun 30, 2022MRLead and Copper RuleWater Quality Parameter M/R1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Apr 25, 2023 (sanitary survey); 3 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 3 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 20.6 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records