Tap Water Lookup

EPA system TX0310001 · Texas

Brownsville Public Utilities Board: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID TX0310001; community water system; Texas; source: surface water; serves 201,249 people via 62,849 connections; status: active

In focus201,249people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 51.1 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.51.1 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled July 2024–April 2025. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Brownsville Public Utilities Board is a local-government-owned community water system in Texas serving about 201,249 people, matched to 5 ZIP codes.

1.2 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
4 of 4 results at the highest location; highest single sample 4.7 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · below the MCL
6.6 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
4 of 4 results at the highest location; highest single sample 9.2 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · at or above the MCL
51.1 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
8 of 8 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
7 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
240 results, 2 entry points
1 at or above an MCL on the average basis
0 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2024
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
0 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (6 of 6 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 6 of 8 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
  • PFOS EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOS at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOS exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFHxS EPA's 2024 rule cites health effects assessments associating PFHxS with thyroid, liver and immune effects. EPA source
  • PFOA EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOA at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOA exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 8. PFOS averaged 6.6 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. EPA's limit applies to a running yearly average and is enforced from 2029. That PFOS result is higher than 94% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it. Lithium reached 51.1 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between July 2024 and June 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 240 samples from 2 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 8 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOA was 1.2 ppt, below the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 4.7 ppt). Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOS was 6.6 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 9.2 ppt). Lithium reached 51.1 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
51.1 ppb
at or above the health reference level
PFPeAhighest single sample
7.6 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFOScomplete-set average
6.6 ppt
at or above the MCL
PFHpAhighest single sample
4.1 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFHxScomplete-set average
3.8 ppt
below the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)
PFOAcomplete-set average
1.2 ppt
below the MCL
PFHxAhighest single sample
8.0 ppt
below the screening level
PFBAhighest single sample
9.3 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 22 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium8851.1 ppb45.8 ppb (4 of 4)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelJuly 2024 – April 2025
PFPeA887.6 ppt5.6 ppt (4 of 4)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueJuly 2024 – June 2025
PFOS879.2 ppt6.6 ppt (4 of 4)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averageat or above the MCLJuly 2024 – June 2025
PFHpA824.1 ppt1.8 ppt (4 of 4)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueJuly 2024 – June 2025
PFHxS884.4 ppt3.8 ppt (4 of 4)10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)July 2024 – June 2025
PFOA814.7 ppt1.2 ppt (4 of 4)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the MCLJuly 2024 – June 2025
PFHxA888.0 ppt5.9 ppt (4 of 4)3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelJuly 2024 – June 2025
PFBA879.3 ppt7.1 ppt (4 of 4)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelJuly 2024 – June 2025
11Cl-PF3OUdS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – June 2025
4:2 FTS80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – June 2025
6:2 FTS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – June 2025
8:2 FTS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – June 2025
9Cl-PF3ONS80< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – June 2025
ADONA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – June 2025
HFPO-DA (GenX)80< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – June 2025
NEtFOSAA80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – June 2025
NFDHA80< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – June 2025
NMeFOSAA80< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – June 2025
PFBS80< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – June 2025
PFDA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – June 2025
PFDoA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – June 2025
PFEESA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – June 2025
PFHpS80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – June 2025
PFMBA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – June 2025
PFMPA80< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – June 2025
PFNA80< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – June 2025
PFPeS80< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – June 2025
PFTA80< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – June 2025
PFTrDA80< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – June 2025
PFUnA80< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2024 – June 2025
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (49 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Jul 16, 2024Sample Tap WTP #1 (13th St.)surface waterPFBA9.3 ppt5.0 ppt
Jul 16, 2024Sample Tap WTP #1 (13th St.)surface waterPFHxA5.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 16, 2024Sample Tap WTP #1 (13th St.)surface waterPFHxS4.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 16, 2024Sample Tap WTP #1 (13th St.)surface waterPFOS9.2 ppt4.0 ppt
Jul 16, 2024Sample Tap WTP #1 (13th St.)surface waterPFPeA5.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 16, 2024Sample Tap WTP #1 (13th St.)surface waterLithium46.5 ppb9 ppb
Jul 16, 2024Sample Tap WTP #2 (Robin Hood Rd.)surface waterPFBA7.0 ppt5.0 ppt
Jul 16, 2024Sample Tap WTP #2 (Robin Hood Rd.)surface waterPFHxA4.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 16, 2024Sample Tap WTP #2 (Robin Hood Rd.)surface waterPFHxS3.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 16, 2024Sample Tap WTP #2 (Robin Hood Rd.)surface waterPFOS7.1 ppt4.0 ppt
Jul 16, 2024Sample Tap WTP #2 (Robin Hood Rd.)surface waterPFPeA4.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 16, 2024Sample Tap WTP #2 (Robin Hood Rd.)surface waterLithium37.2 ppb9 ppb
Oct 29, 2024Sample Tap WTP #1 (13th St.)surface waterLithium42 ppb9 ppb
Oct 29, 2024Sample Tap WTP #2 (Robin Hood Rd.)surface waterLithium43 ppb9 ppb
Jan 15, 2025Sample Tap WTP #1 (13th St.)surface waterLithium43.5 ppb9 ppb
Jan 15, 2025Sample Tap WTP #2 (Robin Hood Rd.)surface waterLithium40.4 ppb9 ppb
Feb 25, 2025Sample Tap WTP #1 (13th St.)surface waterPFHxA7.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 25, 2025Sample Tap WTP #1 (13th St.)surface waterPFHxS4.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 25, 2025Sample Tap WTP #1 (13th St.)surface waterPFOS4.8 ppt4.0 ppt
Feb 25, 2025Sample Tap WTP #1 (13th St.)surface waterPFPeA6.8 ppt3.0 ppt
Mar 18, 2025Sample Tap WTP #1 (13th St.)surface waterPFBA6.0 ppt5.0 ppt
Mar 18, 2025Sample Tap WTP #1 (13th St.)surface waterPFHxA6.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Mar 18, 2025Sample Tap WTP #1 (13th St.)surface waterPFHxS3.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Mar 18, 2025Sample Tap WTP #1 (13th St.)surface waterPFOS4.2 ppt4.0 ppt
Mar 18, 2025Sample Tap WTP #1 (13th St.)surface waterPFPeA6.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Mar 18, 2025Sample Tap WTP #2 (Robin Hood Rd.)surface waterPFBA7.5 ppt5.0 ppt
Mar 18, 2025Sample Tap WTP #2 (Robin Hood Rd.)surface waterPFHpA4.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Mar 18, 2025Sample Tap WTP #2 (Robin Hood Rd.)surface waterPFHxA8.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Mar 18, 2025Sample Tap WTP #2 (Robin Hood Rd.)surface waterPFHxS3.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Mar 18, 2025Sample Tap WTP #2 (Robin Hood Rd.)surface waterPFOS5.2 ppt4.0 ppt
Mar 18, 2025Sample Tap WTP #2 (Robin Hood Rd.)surface waterPFPeA7.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 30, 2025Sample Tap WTP #1 (13th St.)surface waterPFBA5.1 ppt5.0 ppt
Apr 30, 2025Sample Tap WTP #1 (13th St.)surface waterPFHxA4.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 30, 2025Sample Tap WTP #1 (13th St.)surface waterPFHxS3.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 30, 2025Sample Tap WTP #1 (13th St.)surface waterPFOA4.7 ppt4.0 ppt
Apr 30, 2025Sample Tap WTP #1 (13th St.)surface waterPFOS8.0 ppt4.0 ppt
Apr 30, 2025Sample Tap WTP #1 (13th St.)surface waterPFPeA4.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 30, 2025Sample Tap WTP #1 (13th St.)surface waterLithium51.1 ppb9 ppb
Apr 30, 2025Sample Tap WTP #2 (Robin Hood Rd.)surface waterPFBA7.3 ppt5.0 ppt
Apr 30, 2025Sample Tap WTP #2 (Robin Hood Rd.)surface waterPFHpA3.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 30, 2025Sample Tap WTP #2 (Robin Hood Rd.)surface waterPFHxA4.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 30, 2025Sample Tap WTP #2 (Robin Hood Rd.)surface waterPFHxS4.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 30, 2025Sample Tap WTP #2 (Robin Hood Rd.)surface waterPFOS5.9 ppt4.0 ppt
Apr 30, 2025Sample Tap WTP #2 (Robin Hood Rd.)surface waterPFPeA4.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 30, 2025Sample Tap WTP #2 (Robin Hood Rd.)surface waterLithium40.2 ppb9 ppb
Jun 24, 2025Sample Tap WTP #2 (Robin Hood Rd.)surface waterPFBA6.4 ppt5.0 ppt
Jun 24, 2025Sample Tap WTP #2 (Robin Hood Rd.)surface waterPFHxA4.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 24, 2025Sample Tap WTP #2 (Robin Hood Rd.)surface waterPFHxS3.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 24, 2025Sample Tap WTP #2 (Robin Hood Rd.)surface waterPFPeA5.3 ppt3.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 6 of 8 sampling events, no at 2 of 8 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 8 of 8 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 6 of 6 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 0 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 16 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998: 1.4 ppbJan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999: 1.2 ppbJan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2002: 0.7 ppbJan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005: 2.4 ppbJan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008: 1.9 ppbJan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012: 1.8 ppbJan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2012: 1.8 ppbJan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015: 2 ppbJan 1, 2018 – Jun 30, 2018: 1.4 ppbJul 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018: 0 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021: 0 ppbJan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024: 0 ppbDec 31, 1998Dec 31, 20240 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 0 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (16 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Jun 30, 2018Lead1.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead1.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2012Lead1.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008Lead1.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead2.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2002Lead0.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead1.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead1.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 16 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Jun 30, 2018Lead1.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead1.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2012Lead1.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008Lead1.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead2.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2002Lead0.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead1.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead1.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Jun 30, 1997Lead1.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1996Lead1.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead6.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists no drinking-water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.

EPA's SDWIS database lists no drinking water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.

None on file.

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Jun 30, 2025 (sanitary survey); 2 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 7 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 51.1 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records