Tap Water Lookup

EPA system TX0460001 · Texas

New Braunfels Utilities: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID TX0460001; community water system; Texas; source: surface water; serves 116,477 people via 50,340 connections; status: active

In focus116,477people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 17 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.17 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled June 2024–March 2025. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

New Braunfels Utilities is a local-government-owned community water system in Texas serving about 116,477 people, matched to 2 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
24 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
24 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
17 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
3 of 24 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
4 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
720 results, 9 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
1.7 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
1 violation in total

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
  • PFHxS EPA's 2024 rule cites health effects assessments associating PFHxS with thyroid, liver and immune effects. EPA source
  • PFBA EPA's 2022 IRIS assessment for PFBA cites thyroid, liver and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source
  • PFHxA EPA's 2023 IRIS assessment for PFHxA cites developmental, liver and blood effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 5. Lithium reached 17 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between June 2024 and June 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 720 samples from 9 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 5 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Lithium reached 17 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
17 ppb
at or above the health reference level
PFPeAhighest single sample
3.4 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFHxScomplete-set average
1.9 ppt
below the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)
PFBAhighest single sample
10.2 ppt
below the screening level
PFHxAhighest single sample
3.0 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 25 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium24317 ppb14.2 ppb (2 of 2)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFPeA2463.4 ppt2.4 ppt (4 of 4)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueJune 2024 – March 2025
PFHxS2443.7 ppt1.9 ppt (2 of 2)10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)June 2024 – March 2025
PFBA24110.2 ppt2.6 ppt (4 of 4)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFHxA2413.0 ppt1.5 ppt (2 of 2)3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelJune 2024 – March 2025
11Cl-PF3OUdS240< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
4:2 FTS240< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
6:2 FTS240< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
8:2 FTS240< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
9Cl-PF3ONS240< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
ADONA240< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
HFPO-DA (GenX)240< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
NEtFOSAA240< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – June 2025
NFDHA240< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
NMeFOSAA240< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – June 2025
PFBS240< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFDA240< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFDoA240< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFEESA240< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFHpA240< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFHpS240< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFMBA240< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFMPA240< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFNA240< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFOA240< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFOS240< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFPeS240< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
PFTA240< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – June 2025
PFTrDA240< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – June 2025
PFUnA240< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – March 2025
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (15 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Jun 18, 2024Sample Tap 3083 Loop 337 (Loop Gst)ground waterPFHxS3.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 18, 2024Sample Tap 6125 Keller Ridge (Copper Ridge Est)ground waterLithium11.3 ppb9 ppb
Jun 18, 2024Sample Tap 2620 Klien Way (Green Valley Inter Connect)mixed ground and surface waterPFPeA3.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 18, 2024Sample Tap 2620 Klien Way (Green Valley Inter Connect)mixed ground and surface waterPFPeA3.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 18, 2024Sample Tap 2205 Lighthouse Dr. (Avery Est)mixed ground and surface waterLithium13.1 ppb9 ppb
Dec 11, 2024Sample Tap 1100 N. Central (Headwaters Tank)ground waterPFHxA3.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 11, 2024Sample Tap 1100 N. Central (Headwaters Tank)ground waterPFHxS3.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 11, 2024Sample Tap 1100 N. Central (Headwaters Tank)ground waterPFPeA3.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 11, 2024Sample Tap 1186 N. Walnut Ave (Grandview Gst)ground waterPFHxS3.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 11, 2024Sample Tap 1094 Elizabeth Ave.(Landa Gst)ground waterPFHxS3.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 11, 2024Sample Tap 1094 Elizabeth Ave.(Landa Gst)ground waterPFPeA3.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 11, 2024Sample Tap Swtp (2356 Gruene Rd.)surface waterPFBA10.2 ppt5.0 ppt
Dec 11, 2024Sample Tap Swtp (2356 Gruene Rd.)surface waterPFPeA3.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 11, 2024Sample Tap 6125 Keller Ridge (Copper Ridge Est)ground waterLithium17 ppb9 ppb
Dec 11, 2024Sample Tap 2620 Klien Way (Green Valley Inter Connect)mixed ground and surface waterPFPeA3.4 ppt3.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: no at 25 of 26 sampling events, not known at 1 of 26 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 26 of 26 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 1.7 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 15 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995: 3.3 ppbJan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1998: 6.6 ppbJan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001: 3.7 ppbJan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007: 3.2 ppbJan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010: 2.4 ppbJan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012: 2.4 ppbJan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015: 3 ppbJul 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018: 1.2 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Jun 30, 2019: 2 ppbJul 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019: 1.6 ppbJan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022: 1.7 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025: 1.7 ppbDec 31, 1995Dec 31, 20251.7 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 1.7 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (15 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead1.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022Lead1.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019Lead1.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Jun 30, 2019Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead1.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead2.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead2.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead3.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001Lead3.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1998Lead6.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995Lead3.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 15 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead1.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022Lead1.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019Lead1.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Jun 30, 2019Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead1.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead2.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead2.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead3.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001Lead3.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1998Lead6.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995Lead3.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1994 – Dec 31, 1994Lead3.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Jun 30, 1993Lead2.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead3.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 1 violation since Sep 3, 2016. None is health-based. All concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices, not the water itself.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 1 violation recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 1 for monitoring or reporting, none health-based.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Sep 1, 2024 – Sep 30, 2024MRCarbon, TotalMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Jun 26, 2025 (sanitary survey); 2 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 4 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 17 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records