Tap Water Lookup

EPA system TX0610036 · Texas

Mustang SUD: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID TX0610036; community water system; Texas; source: purchased surface water; serves 110,826 people via 36,942 connections; status: active

In focus110,826people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 41.2 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.41.2 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled January 2025–October 2025. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Mustang SUD is a local-government-owned community water system in Texas serving about 110,826 people, matched to 6 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
20 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
20 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
41.2 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
16 of 21 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
3 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
605 results, 10 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
1.3 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
6 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (4 of 4 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 4 of 22 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
  • PFHxA EPA's 2023 IRIS assessment for PFHxA cites developmental, liver and blood effects in animal studies. EPA source
  • PFBA EPA's 2022 IRIS assessment for PFBA cites thyroid, liver and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 4. Lithium reached 41.2 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between January 2025 and October 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 605 samples from 10 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 4 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Lithium reached 41.2 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
41.2 ppb
at or above the health reference level
PFPeAhighest single sample
4.0 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFHxAhighest single sample
3.7 ppt
below the screening level
PFBAhighest single sample
6.4 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 26 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium211641.2 ppb33.2 ppb (2 of 2)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFPeA2014.0 ppt0.0 ppt (2 of 2)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueJanuary 2025 – September 2025
PFHxA2013.7 ppt0.0 ppt (2 of 2)3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelJanuary 2025 – September 2025
PFBA2016.4 ppt0.0 ppt (2 of 2)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelJanuary 2025 – September 2025
11Cl-PF3OUdS200< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – September 2025
4:2 FTS200< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – September 2025
6:2 FTS200< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – September 2025
8:2 FTS200< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – September 2025
9Cl-PF3ONS200< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – September 2025
ADONA200< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – September 2025
HFPO-DA (GenX)200< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – September 2025
NEtFOSAA210< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
NFDHA200< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – September 2025
NMeFOSAA210< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFBS200< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – September 2025
PFDA200< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – September 2025
PFDoA200< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – September 2025
PFEESA200< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – September 2025
PFHpA200< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – September 2025
PFHpS200< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – September 2025
PFHxS200< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – September 2025
PFMBA200< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – September 2025
PFMPA200< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – September 2025
PFNA200< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – September 2025
PFOA200< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – September 2025
PFOS200< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – September 2025
PFPeS200< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – September 2025
PFTA210< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFTrDA210< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – October 2025
PFUnA200< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJanuary 2025 – September 2025
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (19 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Jan 27, 2025Well 1 10263 Fm 2931, Pilot Pointground waterLithium41.2 ppb9 ppb
Jan 27, 2025Well 2 5066 Hwy 377, Krugervilleground waterLithium24.4 ppb9 ppb
Jan 27, 2025Well 3 10744 Stiles Rd., Pilot Pointground waterLithium20.8 ppb9 ppb
Jan 27, 2025Well 10 7985 Fm 2931, Aubreyground waterLithium24.2 ppb9 ppb
Jan 27, 2025Silverado 2 Well Ike Byrome/Fm 2931, Pilot Pointground waterLithium27.5 ppb9 ppb
Jan 27, 2025Hathaway Well Us Hwy 377/Dr Griffin Dr., Cross Roadsground waterLithium26.7 ppb9 ppb
Jan 27, 2025Light Ranch 15864 Fritcher Rd, Pilot Pointground waterLithium21.6 ppb9 ppb
Jan 27, 2025Houlihan Well 17373 Fm 428, Celinaground waterLithium19.2 ppb9 ppb
Apr 21, 2025Well 5 Fm 455 and Hwy 377, Pilot Pointground waterLithium28.4 ppb9 ppb
Jul 14, 2025Well 1 10263 Fm 2931, Pilot Pointground waterLithium25.1 ppb9 ppb
Jul 14, 2025Well 2 5066 Hwy 377, Krugervilleground waterLithium25 ppb9 ppb
Jul 14, 2025Well 3 10744 Stiles Rd., Pilot Pointground waterLithium21.1 ppb9 ppb
Jul 14, 2025Well 10 7985 Fm 2931, Aubreyground waterLithium24.3 ppb9 ppb
Jul 14, 2025Hathaway Well Us Hwy 377/Dr Griffin Dr., Cross Roadsground waterLithium26.2 ppb9 ppb
Jul 14, 2025Light Ranch 15864 Fritcher Rd, Pilot Pointground waterLithium21.5 ppb9 ppb
Jul 14, 2025Houlihan Well 17373 Fm 428, Celinaground waterLithium14 ppb9 ppb
Sep 22, 2025Temple Dane Pump Station 3805 Fm 720, Aubreysurface waterPFBA6.4 ppt5.0 ppt
Sep 22, 2025Temple Dane Pump Station 3805 Fm 720, Aubreysurface waterPFHxA3.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 22, 2025Temple Dane Pump Station 3805 Fm 720, Aubreysurface waterPFPeA4.0 ppt3.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: no at 18 of 22 sampling events, yes at 4 of 22 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 22 of 22 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 4 of 4 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 1.3 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 16 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1999: 2 ppbJan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007: 1.4 ppbJan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2014: 1.7 ppbJan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2015: 0 ppbJan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016: 1.3 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Jun 30, 2019: 1.1 ppbJul 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019: 0 ppbJan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022: 1.2 ppbJan 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024: 1.6 ppbJul 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024: 1.7 ppbJan 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2025: 1.5 ppbJul 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025: 1.3 ppbDec 31, 1999Dec 31, 20251.3 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 1.3 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (16 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jul 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead1.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2025Lead1.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024Lead1.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024Lead1.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022Lead1.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Jun 30, 2019Lead1.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016Lead1.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2015Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2014Lead1.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead1.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1999Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 16 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jul 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025Lead1.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2025Lead1.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024Lead1.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024Lead1.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022Lead1.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Jun 30, 2019Lead1.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016Lead1.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2015Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2014Lead1.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead1.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1999Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1996Lead1.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1994 – Jun 30, 1994Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1993 – Dec 31, 1993Lead3.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 6 violations since Sep 3, 2016. None is health-based. All concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices, not the water itself. 1 is still open.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 6 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 4 for monitoring or reporting, 2 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements), none health-based; 1 is not yet resolved.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Feb 6, 2026OtherPublic NoticePublic Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jul 2, 2025RPTLead and Copper Rule RevisionsNotification, Known or Potential LSL1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action
Jan 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2025MRLead and Copper RuleWater Quality Parameter M/R1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024MRLead and Copper RuleWater Quality Parameter M/R1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Sep 6, 2020OtherPublic NoticePublic Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation1 recordUnaddressed · 1 enforcement action
Jan 1, 2019 – Jun 30, 2019MRLead and Copper RuleWater Quality Parameter M/R1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Feb 6, 2024 (sanitary survey); 1 visit since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 3 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 41.2 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records