Tap Water Lookup

EPA system TX0680002 · Texas

City of Odessa: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID TX0680002; community water system; Texas; source: surface water; serves 123,334 people via 55,910 connections; status: active

In focus123,334people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 48 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.48 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled August 2024–May 2025. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

City of Odessa is a local-government-owned community water system in Texas serving about 123,334 people, matched to 7 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
4 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
4 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
48 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
4 of 4 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
3 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
120 results, 1 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
0 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2024
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
2
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
13 violations in total

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
  • PFHxS EPA's 2024 rule cites health effects assessments associating PFHxS with thyroid, liver and immune effects. EPA source
  • PFBS EPA's 2021 PFBS toxicity assessment cites thyroid, kidney and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source
  • PFBA EPA's 2022 IRIS assessment for PFBA cites thyroid, liver and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 4. Lithium reached 48 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between August 2024 and June 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 120 samples from 1 sampling location for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 4 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Lithium reached 48 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
48 ppb
at or above the health reference level
PFHxScomplete-set average
4.5 ppt
below the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)
PFBShighest single sample
4.5 ppt
below the health-based water concentration
PFBAhighest single sample
5.4 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 26 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium4448 ppb39.1 ppb (4 of 4)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFHxS444.9 ppt4.5 ppt (4 of 4)10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)August 2024 – May 2025
PFBS444.5 ppt3.9 ppt (4 of 4)2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplebelow the health-based water concentrationAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFBA415.4 ppt1.4 ppt (4 of 4)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
11Cl-PF3OUdS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
4:2 FTS40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
6:2 FTS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
8:2 FTS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
9Cl-PF3ONS40< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
ADONA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
HFPO-DA (GenX)40< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
NEtFOSAA40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – June 2025
NFDHA40< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
NMeFOSAA40< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – June 2025
PFDA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFDoA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFEESA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFHpA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFHpS40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFHxA40< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFMBA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFMPA40< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFNA40< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFOA40< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFOS40< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFPeA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFPeS40< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFTA40< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – June 2025
PFTrDA40< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – June 2025
PFUnA40< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (13 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Aug 21, 2024Sample Tap Finished Water Multiple Plantssurface waterPFBS3.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 21, 2024Sample Tap Finished Water Multiple Plantssurface waterPFHxS4.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 21, 2024Sample Tap Finished Water Multiple Plantssurface waterLithium31 ppb9 ppb
Nov 20, 2024Sample Tap Finished Water Multiple Plantssurface waterLithium48 ppb9 ppb
Jan 22, 2025Sample Tap Finished Water Multiple Plantssurface waterPFBS3.8 ppt3.0 ppt
Jan 22, 2025Sample Tap Finished Water Multiple Plantssurface waterPFHxS4.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 26, 2025Sample Tap Finished Water Multiple Plantssurface waterPFBS3.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 26, 2025Sample Tap Finished Water Multiple Plantssurface waterPFHxS4.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 26, 2025Sample Tap Finished Water Multiple Plantssurface waterLithium44.6 ppb9 ppb
May 5, 2025Sample Tap Finished Water Multiple Plantssurface waterPFBA5.4 ppt5.0 ppt
May 5, 2025Sample Tap Finished Water Multiple Plantssurface waterPFBS4.5 ppt3.0 ppt
May 5, 2025Sample Tap Finished Water Multiple Plantssurface waterPFHxS4.2 ppt3.0 ppt
May 5, 2025Sample Tap Finished Water Multiple Plantssurface waterLithium32.9 ppb9 ppb

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: no at 4 of 4 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 4 of 4 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 0 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 16 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1996: 1.7 ppbJan 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997: 1.6 ppbJan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 2000: 1.5 ppbJan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2003: 3.5 ppbJan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006: 4.1 ppbJan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009: 2.7 ppbJan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012: 3.2 ppbJan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2014: 2.6 ppbJan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017: 2.8 ppbJan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2020: 10.1 ppbJan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021: 0 ppbJan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024: 0 ppbDec 31, 1996Dec 31, 20240 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 0 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (16 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2020Lead10.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017Lead2.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2014Lead2.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead3.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009Lead2.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006Lead4.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2003Lead3.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 2000Lead1.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997Lead1.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1996Lead1.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 16 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2020Lead10.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017Lead2.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2014Lead2.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead3.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009Lead2.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006Lead4.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2003Lead3.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 2000Lead1.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997Lead1.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1996Lead1.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995Lead2.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Jun 30, 1995Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead2.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead5.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 13 violations since Sep 3, 2016. 2 are health-based, meaning a contaminant or treatment rule was not met. The other 11 concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices. 1 is still open.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 13 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 2 health-based (a contaminant above its maximum contaminant level, a disinfectant above its maximum residual level, or a required treatment technique not met), 8 for monitoring or reporting, 3 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements); 1 is not yet resolved.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Feb 1, 2021 – Feb 28, 2021TT · health-basedInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleMonthly Turbidity Exceed (Enhanced SWTR)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Oct 1, 2019 – Oct 31, 2019TT · health-basedInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleMonthly Turbidity Exceed (Enhanced SWTR)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Oct 1, 2025 – Oct 31, 2025MRInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Oct 1, 2025 – Oct 31, 2025MRSurface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Filter)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Jul 2, 2025RPTLead and Copper Rule RevisionsNotification, Known or Potential LSL1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action
Feb 1, 2021 – Feb 28, 2021MRInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR)2 recordsResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Dec 1, 2019OtherPublic NoticePublic Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Nov 12, 2019OtherPublic NoticePublic Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation1 recordUnaddressed · 1 enforcement action
Feb 1, 2019 – Feb 28, 2019MRInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2019 – Jan 31, 2019MRInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Oct 1, 2018 – Oct 31, 2018MRInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2018OtherConsumer Confidence RuleConsumer Confidence Report Complete Failure to Report1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Feb 1, 2024 (sanitary survey); 1 visit since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 3 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 48 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records