Tap Water Lookup

EPA system TX1080029 · Texas

North Alamo WSC: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID TX1080029; community water system; Texas; source: surface water; serves 171,195 people via 57,065 connections; status: active

In focus171,195people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 50 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.50 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled February 2023–November 2023. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

North Alamo WSC is a local-government-owned community water system in Texas serving about 171,195 people, matched to 20 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
26 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
26 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
50 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
26 of 26 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
5 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
780 results, 7 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
0 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2023
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
5
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
8 violations in total

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
  • PFHxS EPA's 2024 rule cites health effects assessments associating PFHxS with thyroid, liver and immune effects. EPA source
  • PFBA EPA's 2022 IRIS assessment for PFBA cites thyroid, liver and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source
  • PFBS EPA's 2021 PFBS toxicity assessment cites thyroid, kidney and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 6. Lithium reached 50 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between February 2023 and February 2024, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 780 samples from 7 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 6 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Lithium reached 50 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
50 ppb
at or above the health reference level
PFPeAhighest single sample
3.8 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFHxScomplete-set average
0.9 ppt
below the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)
PFBAhighest single sample
12.2 ppt
below the screening level
PFBShighest single sample
3.0 ppt
below the health-based water concentration
PFHxAhighest single sample
3.5 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 24 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium262650 ppb46.2 ppb (4 of 4)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFPeA2623.8 ppt1.8 ppt (4 of 4)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueFebruary 2023 – December 2023
PFHxS2613.4 ppt0.9 ppt (4 of 4)10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)February 2023 – December 2023
PFBA261212.2 ppt7.0 ppt (4 of 4)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelFebruary 2023 – December 2023
PFBS2613.0 ppt0.8 ppt (4 of 4)2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplebelow the health-based water concentrationFebruary 2023 – December 2023
PFHxA2623.5 ppt0.9 ppt (4 of 4)3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelFebruary 2023 – December 2023
11Cl-PF3OUdS260< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2023
4:2 FTS260< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2023
6:2 FTS260< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2023
8:2 FTS260< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2023
9Cl-PF3ONS260< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2023
ADONA260< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2023
HFPO-DA (GenX)260< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2023
NEtFOSAA260< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – February 2024
NFDHA260< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2023
NMeFOSAA260< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – February 2024
PFDA260< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2023
PFDoA260< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2023
PFEESA260< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2023
PFHpA260< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2023
PFHpS260< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2023
PFMBA260< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2023
PFMPA260< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2023
PFNA260< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2023
PFOA260< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2023
PFOS260< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2023
PFPeS260< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2023
PFTA260< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – February 2024
PFTrDA260< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – February 2024
PFUnA260< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2023
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (44 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Feb 15, 2023Sample Site Plant 1surface waterLithium20.9 ppb9 ppb
Feb 15, 2023Sample Site Plant 2surface waterLithium37.9 ppb9 ppb
Feb 15, 2023Sample Site Plant 4surface waterLithium33.8 ppb9 ppb
Feb 15, 2023Sample Site Plant 5surface waterLithium43.5 ppb9 ppb
Feb 15, 2023Sample Site Plant 6 (Monte Alto)surface waterLithium47.7 ppb9 ppb
Feb 15, 2023Sample Site La Sara Roground waterLithium36.7 ppb9 ppb
Feb 15, 2023Sample Site Plant 7surface waterPFHxA3.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 15, 2023Sample Site Plant 7surface waterLithium45.9 ppb9 ppb
May 8, 2023Sample Site Plant 2surface waterLithium38.4 ppb9 ppb
May 8, 2023Sample Site Plant 4surface waterLithium30.9 ppb9 ppb
May 8, 2023Sample Site Plant 5surface waterPFBA5.6 ppt5.0 ppt
May 8, 2023Sample Site Plant 5surface waterLithium40.5 ppb9 ppb
May 8, 2023Sample Site Plant 6 (Monte Alto)surface waterLithium42 ppb9 ppb
May 8, 2023Sample Site Plant 7surface waterPFHxS3.4 ppt3.0 ppt
May 8, 2023Sample Site Plant 7surface waterLithium48.2 ppb9 ppb
May 15, 2023Sample Site Plant 1surface waterLithium39.2 ppb9 ppb
Aug 8, 2023Sample Site Plant 1surface waterLithium25.6 ppb9 ppb
Aug 8, 2023Sample Site Plant 2surface waterLithium39.3 ppb9 ppb
Aug 8, 2023Sample Site Plant 4surface waterPFBA5.2 ppt5.0 ppt
Aug 8, 2023Sample Site Plant 4surface waterLithium29.8 ppb9 ppb
Aug 8, 2023Sample Site Plant 5surface waterPFBA6.6 ppt5.0 ppt
Aug 8, 2023Sample Site Plant 5surface waterLithium39.5 ppb9 ppb
Aug 8, 2023Sample Site Plant 6 (Monte Alto)surface waterPFBA7.3 ppt5.0 ppt
Aug 8, 2023Sample Site Plant 6 (Monte Alto)surface waterLithium43.6 ppb9 ppb
Aug 8, 2023Sample Site La Sara Roground waterLithium25.1 ppb9 ppb
Aug 8, 2023Sample Site Plant 7surface waterPFBA7.2 ppt5.0 ppt
Aug 8, 2023Sample Site Plant 7surface waterPFBS3.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 8, 2023Sample Site Plant 7surface waterLithium46.9 ppb9 ppb
Nov 6, 2023Sample Site Plant 1surface waterLithium26.5 ppb9 ppb
Nov 6, 2023Sample Site Plant 2surface waterPFBA6.7 ppt5.0 ppt
Nov 6, 2023Sample Site Plant 2surface waterLithium42.6 ppb9 ppb
Nov 6, 2023Sample Site Plant 4surface waterPFBA5.9 ppt5.0 ppt
Nov 6, 2023Sample Site Plant 4surface waterLithium35.6 ppb9 ppb
Nov 6, 2023Sample Site Plant 5surface waterPFBA5.9 ppt5.0 ppt
Nov 6, 2023Sample Site Plant 5surface waterLithium39.9 ppb9 ppb
Nov 6, 2023Sample Site Plant 6 (Monte Alto)surface waterPFBA8.6 ppt5.0 ppt
Nov 6, 2023Sample Site Plant 6 (Monte Alto)surface waterPFPeA3.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Nov 6, 2023Sample Site Plant 6 (Monte Alto)surface waterLithium50 ppb9 ppb
Nov 6, 2023Sample Site Plant 7surface waterPFBA12.2 ppt5.0 ppt
Nov 6, 2023Sample Site Plant 7surface waterLithium43.8 ppb9 ppb
Dec 12, 2023Sample Site Plant 2surface waterPFBA9.0 ppt5.0 ppt
Dec 12, 2023Sample Site Plant 6 (Monte Alto)surface waterPFBA11.9 ppt5.0 ppt
Dec 12, 2023Sample Site Plant 6 (Monte Alto)surface waterPFHxA3.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 12, 2023Sample Site Plant 6 (Monte Alto)surface waterPFPeA3.8 ppt3.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: no at 26 of 26 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 26 of 26 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2023, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 0 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 13 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 1993 – Jun 30, 1993: 4 ppbJan 1, 1994 – Dec 31, 1994: 1 ppbJan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995: 1.8 ppbJan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1998: 2.2 ppbJan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001: 4 ppbJan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007: 2.7 ppbJan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012: 2.1 ppbJan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016: 3.0 ppbJan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019: 0 ppbJan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022: 0 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Jun 30, 2023: 0 ppbJul 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023: 0 ppbJun 30, 1993Dec 31, 20230 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2023, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 0 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (13 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jul 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2023 – Jun 30, 2023Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016Lead3.0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead2.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead2.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1998Lead2.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995Lead1.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1994 – Dec 31, 1994Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Jun 30, 1993Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 13 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jul 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2023 – Jun 30, 2023Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016Lead3.0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead2.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead2.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1998Lead2.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995Lead1.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1994 – Dec 31, 1994Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Jun 30, 1993Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead5.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 8 violations since Sep 3, 2016. 5 are health-based, meaning a contaminant or treatment rule was not met. The other 3 concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 8 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 5 health-based (a contaminant above its maximum contaminant level, a disinfectant above its maximum residual level, or a required treatment technique not met), 2 for monitoring or reporting, 1 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements).

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Oct 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025MCL · health-basedTthm (0.084 MG/L, limit 0.080 mg/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2025 – Sep 30, 2025MCL · health-basedTthm (0.081 MG/L, limit 0.080 mg/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2018 – Mar 31, 2018MCL · health-basedTthm (0.081 MG/L, limit 0.080 mg/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 6 enforcement actions
Oct 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017MCL · health-basedTthm (0.09 MG/L, limit 0.080 mg/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 6 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2017 – Sep 30, 2017MCL · health-basedTthm (0.095 MG/L, limit 0.080 mg/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 6 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2025OtherConsumer Confidence RuleConsumer Confidence Report Inadequate Reporting1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Mar 31, 2024MRLead and Copper RuleLead Consumer Notice1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Sep 26, 2023MRTthmFailure Submit IDSE/Subpart V Plan Rpt1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Aug 1, 2024 (sanitary survey); 3 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 5 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 50 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records