Tap Water Lookup

EPA system TX1650001 · Texas

City of Midland Water Purification Plant: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID TX1650001; community water system; Texas; source: surface water; serves 157,000 people via 42,567 connections; status: active

In focus157,000people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 68.8 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.68.8 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled August 2023–May 2024. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

City of Midland Water Purification Plant is a local-government-owned community water system in Texas serving about 157,000 people, matched to 4 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
6 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
1.1 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
4 of 4 results at the highest location; highest single sample 4.5 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · below the MCL
68.8 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
6 of 6 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
6 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
180 results, 2 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
1.5 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2023
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
6
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
9 violations in total

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
  • PFHxS EPA's 2024 rule cites health effects assessments associating PFHxS with thyroid, liver and immune effects. EPA source
  • PFOS EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOS at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOS exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFBA EPA's 2022 IRIS assessment for PFBA cites thyroid, liver and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 7. PFOS averaged 1.1 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. That PFOS result is higher than 88% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it. Lithium reached 68.8 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between August 2023 and May 2024, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 180 samples from 2 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 7 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOS was 1.1 ppt, below the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 4.5 ppt). Lithium reached 68.8 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
68.8 ppb
at or above the health reference level
PFPeAhighest single sample
3.0 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFHxScomplete-set average
9.1 ppt
below the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)
PFOScomplete-set average
1.1 ppt
below the MCL
PFBAhighest single sample
37.8 ppt
below the screening level
PFBShighest single sample
7.8 ppt
below the health-based water concentration
PFHxAhighest single sample
3.9 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 23 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium6668.8 ppb54.2 ppb (2 of 2)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFPeA613.0 ppt0.8 ppt (4 of 4)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFHxS6411.5 ppt9.1 ppt (4 of 4)10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)August 2023 – May 2024
PFOS614.5 ppt1.1 ppt (4 of 4)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the MCLAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFBA6437.8 ppt15.0 ppt (4 of 4)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFBS637.8 ppt4.2 ppt (4 of 4)2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplebelow the health-based water concentrationAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFHxA623.9 ppt1.8 ppt (4 of 4)3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
11Cl-PF3OUdS60< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
4:2 FTS60< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
6:2 FTS60< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
8:2 FTS60< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
9Cl-PF3ONS60< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
ADONA60< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
HFPO-DA (GenX)60< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
NEtFOSAA60< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
NFDHA60< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
NMeFOSAA60< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFDA60< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFDoA60< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFEESA60< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFHpA60< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFHpS60< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFMBA60< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFMPA60< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFNA60< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFOA60< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFPeS60< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFTA60< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFTrDA60< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
PFUnA60< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2023 – May 2024
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (21 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Aug 9, 2023EP from TP Wppmixed ground and surface waterPFBA9.0 ppt5.0 ppt
Aug 9, 2023EP from TP Wppmixed ground and surface waterPFBS7.8 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 9, 2023EP from TP Wppmixed ground and surface waterPFHxA3.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 9, 2023EP from TP Wppmixed ground and surface waterPFHxS10.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 9, 2023EP from TP Wppmixed ground and surface waterLithium48 ppb9 ppb
Aug 9, 2023EP004 T-Bar Wellfieldground waterLithium68.8 ppb9 ppb
Nov 14, 2023EP from TP Wppmixed ground and surface waterLithium52.4 ppb9 ppb
Feb 21, 2024EP from TP Wppmixed ground and surface waterPFBA37.8 ppt5.0 ppt
Feb 21, 2024EP from TP Wppmixed ground and surface waterPFBS3.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 21, 2024EP from TP Wppmixed ground and surface waterPFHxS7.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 21, 2024EP from TP Wppmixed ground and surface waterLithium52.4 ppb9 ppb
Feb 21, 2024EP004 T-Bar Wellfieldground waterLithium39.6 ppb9 ppb
Apr 16, 2024EP from TP Wppmixed ground and surface waterPFBA5.8 ppt5.0 ppt
Apr 16, 2024EP from TP Wppmixed ground and surface waterPFHxS7.3 ppt3.0 ppt
May 29, 2024EP from TP Wppmixed ground and surface waterPFBA7.4 ppt5.0 ppt
May 29, 2024EP from TP Wppmixed ground and surface waterPFBS5.2 ppt3.0 ppt
May 29, 2024EP from TP Wppmixed ground and surface waterPFHxA3.9 ppt3.0 ppt
May 29, 2024EP from TP Wppmixed ground and surface waterPFHxS11.5 ppt3.0 ppt
May 29, 2024EP from TP Wppmixed ground and surface waterPFOS4.5 ppt4.0 ppt
May 29, 2024EP from TP Wppmixed ground and surface waterPFPeA3.0 ppt3.0 ppt
May 29, 2024EP from TP Wppmixed ground and surface waterLithium50 ppb9 ppb

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: no at 6 of 6 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 6 of 6 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2023, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 1.5 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 18 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2003: 2.6 ppbJan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006: 1.7 ppbJan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007: 1.7 ppbJan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009: 0 ppbJan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010: 2.1 ppbJan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012: 4.3 ppbJan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013: 4.3 ppbJan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016: 4.2 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Jun 30, 2019: 2 ppbJul 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019: 2.7 ppbJan 1, 2020 – Jun 30, 2020: 1.4 ppbJan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2023: 1.5 ppbDec 31, 2003Dec 31, 20231.5 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2023, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 1.5 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (18 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2023Lead1.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Jun 30, 2020Lead1.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019Lead2.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Jun 30, 2019Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead4.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead4.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead4.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead2.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead1.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006Lead1.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2003Lead2.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 18 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2023Lead1.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Jun 30, 2020Lead1.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019Lead2.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Jun 30, 2019Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead4.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead4.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead4.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead2.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead1.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006Lead1.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2003Lead2.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 2000Lead1.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1997Lead1.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1994 – Dec 31, 1994Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Dec 31, 1993Lead1.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead2.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead4.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 9 violations since Sep 3, 2016. 6 are health-based, meaning a contaminant or treatment rule was not met. The other 3 concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices. 2 are still open.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 9 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 6 health-based (a contaminant above its maximum contaminant level, a disinfectant above its maximum residual level, or a required treatment technique not met), 3 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements); 2 are not yet resolved.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Jan 1, 2026 – Jan 31, 2026TT · health-basedInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleMonthly Turbidity Exceed (Enhanced SWTR)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2026 – Jan 31, 2026TT · health-basedInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleSingle Turbidity Exceed (Enhanced SWTR)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Nov 1, 2024 – Nov 30, 2024TT · health-basedInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleMonthly Turbidity Exceed (Enhanced SWTR)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Oct 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023MCL · health-basedArsenic (0.011 MG/L, limit 0.010 mg/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2023 – Jan 31, 2023TT · health-basedInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleSingle Turbidity Exceed (Enhanced SWTR)1 recordResolved · 5 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2017 – Mar 31, 2017MCL · health-basedArsenic (0.012 MG/L, limit 0.010 mg/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Mar 3, 2026OtherPublic NoticePublic Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation1 recordUnaddressed · 1 enforcement action
Jan 1, 2026OtherPublic NoticePublic Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation1 recordUnaddressed · 1 enforcement action
Jul 7, 2017OtherPublic NoticePublic Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Mar 27, 2025 (sanitary survey); 2 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 6 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 68.8 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records