EPA system TX1780003 · Texas
City of Corpus Christi: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level
highest single sample; sampled January 2023–October 2023. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.
City of Corpus Christi is a local-government-owned community water system in Texas serving about 318,387 people, matched to 18 ZIP codes.
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
What EPA says about what was found
- Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
- PFBA EPA's 2022 IRIS assessment for PFBA cites thyroid, liver and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source
- PFHxA EPA's 2023 IRIS assessment for PFHxA cites developmental, liver and blood effects in animal studies. EPA source
Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.
PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found
EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 4. Lithium reached 26.2 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.
Between January 2023 and October 2023, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 120 samples from 1 sampling location for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 4 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Lithium reached 26.2 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.
Show the 26 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
| Contaminant | Samples | Detections | Highest single sample | Complete-set average (results used) | EPA reference | Status | Sampled |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lithium | 4 | 4 | 26.2 ppb | 21.7 ppb (4 of 4) | 10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sample | at or above the health reference level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| PFPeA | 4 | 2 | 5.6 ppt | 2.3 ppt (4 of 4) | none set | detected; no EPA reference value | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| PFBA | 4 | 4 | 11.5 ppt | 9.6 ppt (4 of 4) | 6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest sample | below the screening level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| PFHxA | 4 | 1 | 3.8 ppt | 1.0 ppt (4 of 4) | 3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest sample | below the screening level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| 11Cl-PF3OUdS | 4 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| 4:2 FTS | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| 6:2 FTS | 4 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| 8:2 FTS | 4 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| 9Cl-PF3ONS | 4 | 0 | < 2.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| ADONA | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| HFPO-DA (GenX) | 4 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | 10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set average | not detected above the reporting level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| NEtFOSAA | 4 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| NFDHA | 4 | 0 | < 20.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| NMeFOSAA | 4 | 0 | < 6.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| PFBS | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | 2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest sample | not detected above the reporting level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| PFDA | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| PFDoA | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| PFEESA | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| PFHpA | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| PFHpS | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| PFHxS | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | 10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set average | not detected above the reporting level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| PFMBA | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| PFMPA | 4 | 0 | < 4.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| PFNA | 4 | 0 | < 4.0 ppt | — | 10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set average | not detected above the reporting level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| PFOA | 4 | 0 | < 4.0 ppt | — | 4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set average | not detected above the reporting level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| PFOS | 4 | 0 | < 4.0 ppt | — | 4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set average | not detected above the reporting level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| PFPeS | 4 | 0 | < 4.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| PFTA | 4 | 0 | < 8.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| PFTrDA | 4 | 0 | < 7.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
| PFUnA | 4 | 0 | < 2.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | January 2023 – October 2023 |
Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.
Every detection by sampling location (11 results)
| Date | Sampling location | Source water | Contaminant | Result | Reporting level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2023 | Entry Point 001 (High Service 2) Stevens WTP | surface water | Lithium | 19.2 ppb | 9 ppb |
| Jan 18, 2023 | Entry Point 001 (High Service 2) Stevens WTP | surface water | PFBA | 7.3 ppt | 5.0 ppt |
| Apr 3, 2023 | Entry Point 001 (High Service 2) Stevens WTP | surface water | PFBA | 10.4 ppt | 5.0 ppt |
| Apr 3, 2023 | Entry Point 001 (High Service 2) Stevens WTP | surface water | PFHxA | 3.8 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Apr 3, 2023 | Entry Point 001 (High Service 2) Stevens WTP | surface water | PFPeA | 5.6 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Apr 3, 2023 | Entry Point 001 (High Service 2) Stevens WTP | surface water | Lithium | 22.7 ppb | 9 ppb |
| Jul 24, 2023 | Entry Point 001 (High Service 2) Stevens WTP | surface water | PFBA | 9.2 ppt | 5.0 ppt |
| Jul 24, 2023 | Entry Point 001 (High Service 2) Stevens WTP | surface water | Lithium | 18.7 ppb | 9 ppb |
| Oct 17, 2023 | Entry Point 001 (High Service 2) Stevens WTP | surface water | PFBA | 11.5 ppt | 5.0 ppt |
| Oct 17, 2023 | Entry Point 001 (High Service 2) Stevens WTP | surface water | PFPeA | 3.4 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Oct 17, 2023 | Entry Point 001 (High Service 2) Stevens WTP | surface water | Lithium | 26.2 ppb | 9 ppb |
Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 4 of 4 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 4 of 4 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 4 of 4 sampling events.
Lead at customer taps
In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2023, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 1.7 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 16 periods on record reached it.
In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2023, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 1.7 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (16 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).
| Monitoring period | Metal | 90th percentile | Action level | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2023 | Lead | 1.7 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2020 | Lead | 2.4 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017 | Lead | 2.9 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jul 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016 | Lead | 1.7 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015 | Lead | 4.8 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012 | Lead | 2.7 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 | Lead | 4.4 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009 | Lead | 4.5 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005 | Lead | 2.1 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2002 | Lead | 4.7 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999 | Lead | 1.8 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998 | Lead | 4.1 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
Show all 16 monitoring periods on record
| Monitoring period | Metal | 90th percentile | Action level | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2023 | Lead | 1.7 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2020 | Lead | 2.4 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017 | Lead | 2.9 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jul 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016 | Lead | 1.7 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015 | Lead | 4.8 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012 | Lead | 2.7 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 | Lead | 4.4 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009 | Lead | 4.5 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005 | Lead | 2.1 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2002 | Lead | 4.7 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999 | Lead | 1.8 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998 | Lead | 4.1 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jul 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997 | Lead | 4 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 1997 – Jun 30, 1997 | Lead | 5 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992 | Lead | 7.2 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992 | Lead | 6.7 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016
EPA lists 3 violations since Sep 3, 2016. 2 are health-based, meaning a contaminant or treatment rule was not met. The other 1 concerns missed monitoring, reporting or public notices.
EPA's SDWIS database lists 3 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 2 health-based (a contaminant above its maximum contaminant level, a disinfectant above its maximum residual level, or a required treatment technique not met), 1 for monitoring or reporting.
| Compliance period | Type | Contaminant / rule | Description | Records | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2021 – Feb 28, 2021 | TT · health-based | Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule | Monthly Turbidity Exceed (Enhanced SWTR) | 2 records at 2 facilities | Resolved · 4 enforcement actions |
| Jul 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017 | MR | Lead and Copper Rule | Water Quality Parameter M/R | 1 record | Resolved · 4 enforcement actions |
Sanitary surveys and site visits
Most recent state inspection: Jun 16, 2023 (sanitary survey); 1 visit since Sep 3, 2021.
What you can do about these results
Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS
EPA testing found 3 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.
Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.
Lithium: what reduces it
Lithium reached 26.2 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.
No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.
ZIP codes served
Sources
Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.
- EPA ECHO detailed facility report
- EPA UCMR 5 Data Finder
- EPA service-area boundary: modeled, 198.7 sq mi
