Tap Water Lookup

EPA system TX2260001 · Texas

City of San Angelo: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID TX2260001; community water system; Texas; source: surface water; serves 105,229 people via 42,137 connections; status: active

In focus105,229people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 50.1 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.50.1 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled April 2023–January 2024. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

City of San Angelo is a local-government-owned community water system in Texas serving about 105,229 people, matched to 3 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
4 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
4 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
50.1 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
4 of 4 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
5 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
120 results, 1 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
4.0 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2024
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
2
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
6 violations in total

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
  • PFHxS EPA's 2024 rule cites health effects assessments associating PFHxS with thyroid, liver and immune effects. EPA source
  • PFBS EPA's 2021 PFBS toxicity assessment cites thyroid, kidney and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source
  • PFBA EPA's 2022 IRIS assessment for PFBA cites thyroid, liver and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 6. Lithium reached 50.1 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between April 2023 and January 2024, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 120 samples from 1 sampling location for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 6 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Lithium reached 50.1 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
50.1 ppb
at or above the health reference level
PFPeAhighest single sample
3.0 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFHxScomplete-set average
8.7 ppt
below the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)
PFBShighest single sample
8.4 ppt
below the health-based water concentration
PFBAhighest single sample
10.2 ppt
below the screening level
PFHxAhighest single sample
4.0 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 24 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium4450.1 ppb47.1 ppb (4 of 4)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFPeA413.0 ppt0.8 ppt (4 of 4)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueApril 2023 – January 2024
PFHxS449.7 ppt8.7 ppt (4 of 4)10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)April 2023 – January 2024
PFBS448.4 ppt7.4 ppt (4 of 4)2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplebelow the health-based water concentrationApril 2023 – January 2024
PFBA4410.2 ppt7.8 ppt (4 of 4)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFHxA414.0 ppt1.0 ppt (4 of 4)3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelApril 2023 – January 2024
11Cl-PF3OUdS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
4:2 FTS40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
6:2 FTS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
8:2 FTS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
9Cl-PF3ONS40< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
ADONA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
HFPO-DA (GenX)40< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
NEtFOSAA40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
NFDHA40< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
NMeFOSAA40< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFDA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFDoA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFEESA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFHpA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFHpS40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFMBA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFMPA40< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFNA40< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFOA40< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFOS40< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFPeS40< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFTA40< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFTrDA40< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
PFUnA40< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelApril 2023 – January 2024
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (18 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Apr 19, 2023Sample Tap Water Treatment Plantmixed ground and surface waterPFBA6.5 ppt5.0 ppt
Apr 19, 2023Sample Tap Water Treatment Plantmixed ground and surface waterPFBS7.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 19, 2023Sample Tap Water Treatment Plantmixed ground and surface waterPFHxS9.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Apr 19, 2023Sample Tap Water Treatment Plantmixed ground and surface waterLithium47.2 ppb9 ppb
Jul 12, 2023Sample Tap Water Treatment Plantmixed ground and surface waterPFBA6.4 ppt5.0 ppt
Jul 12, 2023Sample Tap Water Treatment Plantmixed ground and surface waterPFBS7.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 12, 2023Sample Tap Water Treatment Plantmixed ground and surface waterPFHxS7.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 12, 2023Sample Tap Water Treatment Plantmixed ground and surface waterLithium50.1 ppb9 ppb
Oct 24, 2023Sample Tap Water Treatment Plantmixed ground and surface waterPFBA8.1 ppt5.0 ppt
Oct 24, 2023Sample Tap Water Treatment Plantmixed ground and surface waterPFBS6.8 ppt3.0 ppt
Oct 24, 2023Sample Tap Water Treatment Plantmixed ground and surface waterPFHxS8.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Oct 24, 2023Sample Tap Water Treatment Plantmixed ground and surface waterLithium42.9 ppb9 ppb
Jan 17, 2024Sample Tap Water Treatment Plantmixed ground and surface waterPFBA10.2 ppt5.0 ppt
Jan 17, 2024Sample Tap Water Treatment Plantmixed ground and surface waterPFBS8.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Jan 17, 2024Sample Tap Water Treatment Plantmixed ground and surface waterPFHxA4.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Jan 17, 2024Sample Tap Water Treatment Plantmixed ground and surface waterPFHxS9.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Jan 17, 2024Sample Tap Water Treatment Plantmixed ground and surface waterPFPeA3.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Jan 17, 2024Sample Tap Water Treatment Plantmixed ground and surface waterLithium48 ppb9 ppb

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: no at 4 of 4 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 4 of 4 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 4.0 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. The action level has been reached in 1 of the 15 periods on record.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1997: 6.4 ppbJan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 2000: 10 ppbJan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2003: 6.3 ppbJan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006: 15.6 ppbJan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009: 0 ppbJan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012: 10.9 ppbJan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013: 4.9 ppbJan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016: 4.3 ppbJan 1, 2018 – Jun 30, 2018: 3.4 ppbJul 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018: 3.7 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021: 4 ppbJan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024: 4.0 ppbDec 31, 1997Dec 31, 20244.0 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 4.0 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb; 1 of the 15 monitoring periods on record reached the action level. The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024Lead4.0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead3.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Jun 30, 2018Lead3.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead4.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013Lead4.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead10.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006Lead15.6 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2003Lead6.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 2000Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1997Lead6.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 15 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024Lead4.0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018Lead3.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Jun 30, 2018Lead3.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead4.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013Lead4.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead10.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006Lead15.6 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2003Lead6.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 2000Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1997Lead6.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1994 – Dec 31, 1994Lead6.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead4.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead5.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 6 violations since Sep 3, 2016. 2 are health-based, meaning a contaminant or treatment rule was not met. The other 4 concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 6 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 2 health-based (a contaminant above its maximum contaminant level, a disinfectant above its maximum residual level, or a required treatment technique not met), 2 for monitoring or reporting, 2 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements).

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Oct 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024MCL · health-basedTthm (0.086 MG/L, limit 0.080 mg/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2024 – Sep 30, 2024MCL · health-basedTthm (0.083 MG/L, limit 0.080 mg/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Jul 2, 2025RPTLead and Copper Rule RevisionsNotification, Known or Potential LSL1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action
Jul 1, 2025OtherConsumer Confidence RuleConsumer Confidence Report Inadequate Reporting1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Dec 30, 2024MRLead and Copper RuleLead Consumer Notice1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Sep 22, 2024OtherPublic NoticePublic Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Jul 17, 2025 (sanitary survey); 2 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 5 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Filters certified for lead reduction

1 of this utility's 15 lead monitoring periods on record reached the 15 ppb action level (most recent 90th percentile 4.0 ppb).

NSF/ANSI 53 with a lead-reduction claim, or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. Lead comes from plumbing, so a point-of-use filter at the kitchen tap is the relevant type.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 50.1 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records