EPA system TX2260001 · Texas
City of San Angelo: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level
highest single sample; sampled April 2023–January 2024. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.
City of San Angelo is a local-government-owned community water system in Texas serving about 105,229 people, matched to 3 ZIP codes.
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
What EPA says about what was found
- Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
- PFHxS EPA's 2024 rule cites health effects assessments associating PFHxS with thyroid, liver and immune effects. EPA source
- PFBS EPA's 2021 PFBS toxicity assessment cites thyroid, kidney and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source
- PFBA EPA's 2022 IRIS assessment for PFBA cites thyroid, liver and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source
Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.
PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found
EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 6. Lithium reached 50.1 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.
Between April 2023 and January 2024, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 120 samples from 1 sampling location for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 6 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Lithium reached 50.1 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.
Show the 24 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
| Contaminant | Samples | Detections | Highest single sample | Complete-set average (results used) | EPA reference | Status | Sampled |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lithium | 4 | 4 | 50.1 ppb | 47.1 ppb (4 of 4) | 10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sample | at or above the health reference level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| PFPeA | 4 | 1 | 3.0 ppt | 0.8 ppt (4 of 4) | none set | detected; no EPA reference value | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| PFHxS | 4 | 4 | 9.7 ppt | 8.7 ppt (4 of 4) | 10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set average | below the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed) | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| PFBS | 4 | 4 | 8.4 ppt | 7.4 ppt (4 of 4) | 2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest sample | below the health-based water concentration | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| PFBA | 4 | 4 | 10.2 ppt | 7.8 ppt (4 of 4) | 6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest sample | below the screening level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| PFHxA | 4 | 1 | 4.0 ppt | 1.0 ppt (4 of 4) | 3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest sample | below the screening level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| 11Cl-PF3OUdS | 4 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| 4:2 FTS | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| 6:2 FTS | 4 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| 8:2 FTS | 4 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| 9Cl-PF3ONS | 4 | 0 | < 2.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| ADONA | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| HFPO-DA (GenX) | 4 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | 10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set average | not detected above the reporting level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| NEtFOSAA | 4 | 0 | < 5.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| NFDHA | 4 | 0 | < 20.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| NMeFOSAA | 4 | 0 | < 6.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| PFDA | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| PFDoA | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| PFEESA | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| PFHpA | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| PFHpS | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| PFMBA | 4 | 0 | < 3.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| PFMPA | 4 | 0 | < 4.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| PFNA | 4 | 0 | < 4.0 ppt | — | 10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set average | not detected above the reporting level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| PFOA | 4 | 0 | < 4.0 ppt | — | 4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set average | not detected above the reporting level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| PFOS | 4 | 0 | < 4.0 ppt | — | 4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set average | not detected above the reporting level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| PFPeS | 4 | 0 | < 4.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| PFTA | 4 | 0 | < 8.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| PFTrDA | 4 | 0 | < 7.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
| PFUnA | 4 | 0 | < 2.0 ppt | — | none set | not detected above the reporting level | April 2023 – January 2024 |
Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.
Every detection by sampling location (18 results)
| Date | Sampling location | Source water | Contaminant | Result | Reporting level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2023 | Sample Tap Water Treatment Plant | mixed ground and surface water | PFBA | 6.5 ppt | 5.0 ppt |
| Apr 19, 2023 | Sample Tap Water Treatment Plant | mixed ground and surface water | PFBS | 7.1 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Apr 19, 2023 | Sample Tap Water Treatment Plant | mixed ground and surface water | PFHxS | 9.7 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Apr 19, 2023 | Sample Tap Water Treatment Plant | mixed ground and surface water | Lithium | 47.2 ppb | 9 ppb |
| Jul 12, 2023 | Sample Tap Water Treatment Plant | mixed ground and surface water | PFBA | 6.4 ppt | 5.0 ppt |
| Jul 12, 2023 | Sample Tap Water Treatment Plant | mixed ground and surface water | PFBS | 7.2 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Jul 12, 2023 | Sample Tap Water Treatment Plant | mixed ground and surface water | PFHxS | 7.9 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Jul 12, 2023 | Sample Tap Water Treatment Plant | mixed ground and surface water | Lithium | 50.1 ppb | 9 ppb |
| Oct 24, 2023 | Sample Tap Water Treatment Plant | mixed ground and surface water | PFBA | 8.1 ppt | 5.0 ppt |
| Oct 24, 2023 | Sample Tap Water Treatment Plant | mixed ground and surface water | PFBS | 6.8 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Oct 24, 2023 | Sample Tap Water Treatment Plant | mixed ground and surface water | PFHxS | 8.0 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Oct 24, 2023 | Sample Tap Water Treatment Plant | mixed ground and surface water | Lithium | 42.9 ppb | 9 ppb |
| Jan 17, 2024 | Sample Tap Water Treatment Plant | mixed ground and surface water | PFBA | 10.2 ppt | 5.0 ppt |
| Jan 17, 2024 | Sample Tap Water Treatment Plant | mixed ground and surface water | PFBS | 8.4 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Jan 17, 2024 | Sample Tap Water Treatment Plant | mixed ground and surface water | PFHxA | 4.0 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Jan 17, 2024 | Sample Tap Water Treatment Plant | mixed ground and surface water | PFHxS | 9.2 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Jan 17, 2024 | Sample Tap Water Treatment Plant | mixed ground and surface water | PFPeA | 3.0 ppt | 3.0 ppt |
| Jan 17, 2024 | Sample Tap Water Treatment Plant | mixed ground and surface water | Lithium | 48 ppb | 9 ppb |
Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: no at 4 of 4 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 4 of 4 sampling events.
Lead at customer taps
In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 4.0 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. The action level has been reached in 1 of the 15 periods on record.
In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 4.0 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb; 1 of the 15 monitoring periods on record reached the action level. The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).
| Monitoring period | Metal | 90th percentile | Action level | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024 | Lead | 4.0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021 | Lead | 4 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jul 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018 | Lead | 3.7 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2018 – Jun 30, 2018 | Lead | 3.4 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016 | Lead | 4.3 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013 | Lead | 4.9 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012 | Lead | 10.9 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009 | Lead | 0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006 | Lead | 15.6 ppb | 15 ppb | at or above the action level |
| Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2003 | Lead | 6.3 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 2000 | Lead | 10 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1997 | Lead | 6.4 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
Show all 15 monitoring periods on record
| Monitoring period | Metal | 90th percentile | Action level | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024 | Lead | 4.0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021 | Lead | 4 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jul 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018 | Lead | 3.7 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2018 – Jun 30, 2018 | Lead | 3.4 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016 | Lead | 4.3 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013 | Lead | 4.9 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012 | Lead | 10.9 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009 | Lead | 0 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006 | Lead | 15.6 ppb | 15 ppb | at or above the action level |
| Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2003 | Lead | 6.3 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 2000 | Lead | 10 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1997 | Lead | 6.4 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 1994 – Dec 31, 1994 | Lead | 6.1 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992 | Lead | 4.9 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
| Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992 | Lead | 5.5 ppb | 15 ppb | below the action level |
Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016
EPA lists 6 violations since Sep 3, 2016. 2 are health-based, meaning a contaminant or treatment rule was not met. The other 4 concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices.
EPA's SDWIS database lists 6 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 2 health-based (a contaminant above its maximum contaminant level, a disinfectant above its maximum residual level, or a required treatment technique not met), 2 for monitoring or reporting, 2 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements).
| Compliance period | Type | Contaminant / rule | Description | Records | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024 | MCL · health-based | Tthm (0.086 MG/L, limit 0.080 mg/L) | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 1 record | Resolved · 4 enforcement actions |
| Jul 1, 2024 – Sep 30, 2024 | MCL · health-based | Tthm (0.083 MG/L, limit 0.080 mg/L) | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 1 record | Resolved · 4 enforcement actions |
| Jul 2, 2025 | RPT | Lead and Copper Rule Revisions | Notification, Known or Potential LSL | 1 record | Resolved · 1 enforcement action |
| Jul 1, 2025 | Other | Consumer Confidence Rule | Consumer Confidence Report Inadequate Reporting | 1 record | Resolved · 2 enforcement actions |
| Dec 30, 2024 | MR | Lead and Copper Rule | Lead Consumer Notice | 1 record | Resolved · 2 enforcement actions |
| Sep 22, 2024 | Other | Public Notice | Public Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation | 1 record | Resolved · 2 enforcement actions |
Sanitary surveys and site visits
Most recent state inspection: Jul 17, 2025 (sanitary survey); 2 visits since Sep 3, 2021.
What you can do about these results
Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS
EPA testing found 5 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.
Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.
Filters certified for lead reduction
1 of this utility's 15 lead monitoring periods on record reached the 15 ppb action level (most recent 90th percentile 4.0 ppb).
NSF/ANSI 53 with a lead-reduction claim, or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. Lead comes from plumbing, so a point-of-use filter at the kitchen tap is the relevant type.
Lithium: what reduces it
Lithium reached 50.1 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.
No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.
ZIP codes served
Sources
Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.
- EPA ECHO detailed facility report
- EPA UCMR 5 Data Finder
- EPA service-area boundary: modeled, 57.7 sq mi
