Tap Water Lookup

EPA system TX2400001 · Texas

City of Laredo: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID TX2400001; community water system; Texas; source: surface water; serves 260,046 people via 88,747 connections; status: active

In focus260,046people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 34.3 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.34.3 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled June 2023–March 2024. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

City of Laredo is a local-government-owned community water system in Texas serving about 260,046 people, matched to 5 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
8 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
8 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
34.3 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
8 of 8 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
1 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
240 results, 2 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
1.4 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2024
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
5
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
19 violations in total

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
  • PFBA EPA's 2022 IRIS assessment for PFBA cites thyroid, liver and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 2. Lithium reached 34.3 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between June 2023 and July 2024, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 240 samples from 2 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 2 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Lithium reached 34.3 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
34.3 ppb
at or above the health reference level
PFBAhighest single sample
10.6 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 28 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium8834.3 ppb28.0 ppb (4 of 4)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelJune 2023 – March 2024
PFBA8510.6 ppt5.5 ppt (4 of 4)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelJune 2023 – July 2024
11Cl-PF3OUdS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – July 2024
4:2 FTS80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – July 2024
6:2 FTS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – July 2024
8:2 FTS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – July 2024
9Cl-PF3ONS80< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – July 2024
ADONA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – July 2024
HFPO-DA (GenX)80< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – July 2024
NEtFOSAA80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – March 2024
NFDHA80< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – July 2024
NMeFOSAA80< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – March 2024
PFBS80< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – July 2024
PFDA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – July 2024
PFDoA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – July 2024
PFEESA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – July 2024
PFHpA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – July 2024
PFHpS80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – July 2024
PFHxA80< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – July 2024
PFHxS80< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – July 2024
PFMBA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – July 2024
PFMPA80< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – July 2024
PFNA80< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – July 2024
PFOA80< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – July 2024
PFOS80< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – July 2024
PFPeA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – July 2024
PFPeS80< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – July 2024
PFTA80< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – March 2024
PFTrDA80< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – March 2024
PFUnA80< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – July 2024
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (13 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Jun 7, 2023Laboratory Sink Jefferson WTPsurface waterLithium18.8 ppb9 ppb
Jun 7, 2023Laboratory Sink El Pico WTPsurface waterPFBA10.6 ppt5.0 ppt
Jun 7, 2023Laboratory Sink El Pico WTPsurface waterLithium15.5 ppb9 ppb
Sep 11, 2023Laboratory Sink Jefferson WTPsurface waterPFBA5.3 ppt5.0 ppt
Sep 11, 2023Laboratory Sink Jefferson WTPsurface waterLithium28.6 ppb9 ppb
Sep 11, 2023Laboratory Sink El Pico WTPsurface waterPFBA5.5 ppt5.0 ppt
Sep 11, 2023Laboratory Sink El Pico WTPsurface waterLithium26.4 ppb9 ppb
Dec 18, 2023Laboratory Sink Jefferson WTPsurface waterLithium31.6 ppb9 ppb
Dec 18, 2023Laboratory Sink El Pico WTPsurface waterLithium30.4 ppb9 ppb
Mar 25, 2024Laboratory Sink Jefferson WTPsurface waterLithium33.1 ppb9 ppb
Mar 25, 2024Laboratory Sink El Pico WTPsurface waterLithium34.3 ppb9 ppb
Jul 29, 2024Laboratory Sink Jefferson WTPsurface waterPFBA5.2 ppt5.0 ppt
Jul 29, 2024Laboratory Sink El Pico WTPsurface waterPFBA5.8 ppt5.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: not known at 8 of 8 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: not known at 8 of 8 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 1.4 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 16 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jul 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997: 2.5 ppbJan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998: 2.7 ppbJan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999: 2.8 ppbJan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2002: 1.1 ppbJan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005: 0.9 ppbJan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009: 1.3 ppbJan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013: 1.1 ppbJan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016: 0.9 ppbJul 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017: 0.9 ppbJan 1, 2018 – Jun 30, 2018: 1.0 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021: 1.3 ppbJan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024: 1.4 ppbDec 31, 1997Dec 31, 20241.4 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 1.4 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (16 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024Lead1.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead1.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Jun 30, 2018Lead1.0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017Lead0.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead0.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013Lead1.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009Lead1.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead0.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2002Lead1.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead2.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead2.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997Lead2.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 16 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024Lead1.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead1.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Jun 30, 2018Lead1.0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017Lead0.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead0.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013Lead1.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009Lead1.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead0.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2002Lead1.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead2.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead2.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997Lead2.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Jun 30, 1997Lead2.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Dec 31, 1993Lead3.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead4.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead5.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 19 violations since Sep 3, 2016. 5 are health-based, meaning a contaminant or treatment rule was not met. The other 14 concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 19 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 5 health-based (a contaminant above its maximum contaminant level, a disinfectant above its maximum residual level, or a required treatment technique not met), 9 for monitoring or reporting, 5 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements).

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
May 1, 2026 – May 31, 2026MCL · health-basedRevised Total Coliform RuleMaximum Contaminant Level Violation, E. coli (RTCR)1 recordArchived · 4 enforcement actions
Oct 17, 2024TT · health-basedLead and Copper Rule RevisionsLSL Inventory1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Oct 1, 2024 – Oct 31, 2024MCL · health-basedRevised Total Coliform RuleMaximum Contaminant Level Violation, E. coli (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 5 enforcement actions
Jan 1, 2017 – Mar 31, 2017MCL · health-basedTthm (0.107 MG/L, limit 0.080 mg/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 5 enforcement actions
Oct 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2016MCL · health-basedTthm (0.098 MG/L, limit 0.080 mg/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 5 enforcement actions
May 15, 2025OtherPublic NoticePublic Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Oct 17, 2024RPTLead and Copper Rule RevisionsLSL Reporting1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Sep 1, 2024 – Sep 30, 2024MRInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR)2 recordsResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Aug 1, 2024 – Aug 31, 2024MRInterim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring, Turbidity (Enhanced SWTR)2 recordsResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Aug 1, 2021OtherPublic NoticePublic Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Sep 1, 2020 – Sep 30, 2020MRLong Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Filter)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2020 – Jul 31, 2020MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Nov 1, 2017 – Nov 30, 2017MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2017OtherConsumer Confidence RuleConsumer Confidence Report Inadequate Reporting1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Mar 21, 2017OtherPublic NoticePublic Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Mar 1, 2017 – Mar 31, 2017MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordResolved · 3 enforcement actions
Nov 11, 2016OtherPublic NoticePublic Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Jun 3, 2026 (reason not recorded); 4 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 1 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 34.3 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records