Tap Water Lookup

EPA system TX2460001 · Texas

City of Georgetown: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID TX2460001; community water system; Texas; source: surface water; serves 191,639 people via 63,879 connections; status: active

In focus191,639people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 17.4 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.17.4 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled June 2023–December 2024. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

City of Georgetown is a local-government-owned community water system in Texas serving about 191,639 people, matched to 11 ZIP codes.

1.2 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
4 of 4 results at the highest location; highest single sample 4.9 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · below the MCL
3.6 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
4 of 4 results at the highest location; highest single sample 5.7 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · below the MCL
17.4 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
10 of 22 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
7 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
660 results, 6 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
2.2 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Jun 30, 2023
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
1
health-based violation since Sep 3, 2016
3 violations in total

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
  • PFOS EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOS at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOS exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFOA EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOA at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOA exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFHxS EPA's 2024 rule cites health effects assessments associating PFHxS with thyroid, liver and immune effects. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 8. PFOA averaged 1.2 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt, and PFOS averaged 3.6 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. That PFOS result is higher than 91% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it. Lithium reached 17.4 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between June 2023 and February 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 660 samples from 6 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 8 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOA was 1.2 ppt, below the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 4.9 ppt). Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOS was 3.6 ppt, below the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 5.7 ppt). Lithium reached 17.4 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
PFPeAhighest single sample
18.7 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
Lithiumhighest single sample
17.4 ppb
at or above the health reference level
PFOScomplete-set average
3.6 ppt
below the MCL
PFOAcomplete-set average
1.2 ppt
below the MCL
PFHxScomplete-set average
3.0 ppt
below the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)
PFBAhighest single sample
33.8 ppt
below the screening level
PFBShighest single sample
9.6 ppt
below the health-based water concentration
PFHxAhighest single sample
10.1 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 22 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
PFPeA221918.7 ppt8.9 ppt (4 of 4)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueJune 2023 – December 2024
Lithium221017.4 ppb15.3 ppb (4 of 4)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelJune 2023 – December 2024
PFOS2235.7 ppt3.6 ppt (4 of 4)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the MCLJune 2023 – December 2024
PFOA2214.9 ppt1.2 ppt (4 of 4)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the MCLJune 2023 – December 2024
PFHxS22114.7 ppt3.0 ppt (4 of 4)10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)June 2023 – December 2024
PFBA221333.8 ppt16.9 ppt (2 of 2)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelJune 2023 – December 2024
PFBS22199.6 ppt9.0 ppt (4 of 4)2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplebelow the health-based water concentrationJune 2023 – December 2024
PFHxA221110.1 ppt4.2 ppt (4 of 4)3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelJune 2023 – December 2024
11Cl-PF3OUdS220< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – December 2024
4:2 FTS220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – December 2024
6:2 FTS220< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – December 2024
8:2 FTS220< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – December 2024
9Cl-PF3ONS220< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – December 2024
ADONA220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – December 2024
HFPO-DA (GenX)220< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – December 2024
NEtFOSAA220< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – February 2025
NFDHA220< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – December 2024
NMeFOSAA220< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – February 2025
PFDA220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – December 2024
PFDoA220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – December 2024
PFEESA220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – December 2024
PFHpA220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – December 2024
PFHpS220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – December 2024
PFMBA220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – December 2024
PFMPA220< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – December 2024
PFNA220< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – December 2024
PFPeS220< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – December 2024
PFTA220< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – February 2025
PFTrDA220< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – February 2025
PFUnA220< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2023 – December 2024
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (87 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Jun 14, 2023Sample Tap Domel WTPground waterPFBS6.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 14, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Rabbit Hill Intertiesurface waterPFBS4.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 14, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Rabbit Hill Intertiesurface waterPFHxA3.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 14, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Rabbit Hill Intertiesurface waterPFHxS3.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 14, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Rabbit Hill Intertiesurface waterPFPeA4.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 14, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Rabbit Hill Intertiesurface waterLithium15.3 ppb9 ppb
Jun 14, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Kauffman Loop Intertiesurface waterPFBA5.1 ppt5.0 ppt
Jun 14, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Kauffman Loop Intertiesurface waterPFBS4.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 14, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Kauffman Loop Intertiesurface waterPFHxA3.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 14, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Kauffman Loop Intertiesurface waterPFHxS4.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 14, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Kauffman Loop Intertiesurface waterPFPeA4.8 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 14, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Kauffman Loop Intertiesurface waterLithium14.3 ppb9 ppb
Jun 14, 2023Lab Tap Lake Georgetown WTPsurface waterPFBS3.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 14, 2023Lab Tap Lake Georgetown WTPsurface waterPFHxA3.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 14, 2023Lab Tap Lake Georgetown WTPsurface waterPFHxS4.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 14, 2023Lab Tap Lake Georgetown WTPsurface waterPFPeA4.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 14, 2023Lab Tap Lake Georgetown WTPsurface waterLithium15.4 ppb9 ppb
Jun 14, 2023Lab Tap San Gabriel Park WTPground water under surface-water influencePFBA6.1 ppt5.0 ppt
Jun 14, 2023Lab Tap San Gabriel Park WTPground water under surface-water influencePFBS9.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 14, 2023Lab Tap San Gabriel Park WTPground water under surface-water influencePFHxA3.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 14, 2023Lab Tap San Gabriel Park WTPground water under surface-water influencePFHxS3.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 14, 2023Lab Tap San Gabriel Park WTPground water under surface-water influencePFOS4.6 ppt4.0 ppt
Jun 14, 2023Lab Tap San Gabriel Park WTPground water under surface-water influencePFPeA5.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 20, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Rabbit Hill Intertiesurface waterPFBA5.1 ppt5.0 ppt
Sep 20, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Rabbit Hill Intertiesurface waterPFBS3.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 20, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Rabbit Hill Intertiesurface waterPFHxA3.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 20, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Rabbit Hill Intertiesurface waterPFHxS4.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 20, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Rabbit Hill Intertiesurface waterPFPeA5.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 20, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Rabbit Hill Intertiesurface waterLithium15.1 ppb9 ppb
Sep 20, 2023Lab Tap Lake Georgetown WTPsurface waterPFBA5.9 ppt5.0 ppt
Sep 20, 2023Lab Tap Lake Georgetown WTPsurface waterPFBS4.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 20, 2023Lab Tap Lake Georgetown WTPsurface waterPFHxA3.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 20, 2023Lab Tap Lake Georgetown WTPsurface waterPFHxS4.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 20, 2023Lab Tap Lake Georgetown WTPsurface waterPFPeA5.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 20, 2023Lab Tap Lake Georgetown WTPsurface waterLithium15 ppb9 ppb
Sep 20, 2023Lab Tap San Gabriel Park WTPground water under surface-water influencePFBA9.1 ppt5.0 ppt
Sep 20, 2023Lab Tap San Gabriel Park WTPground water under surface-water influencePFBS9.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 20, 2023Lab Tap San Gabriel Park WTPground water under surface-water influencePFHxA10.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 20, 2023Lab Tap San Gabriel Park WTPground water under surface-water influencePFHxS4.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 20, 2023Lab Tap San Gabriel Park WTPground water under surface-water influencePFOA4.9 ppt4.0 ppt
Sep 20, 2023Lab Tap San Gabriel Park WTPground water under surface-water influencePFOS5.7 ppt4.0 ppt
Sep 20, 2023Lab Tap San Gabriel Park WTPground water under surface-water influencePFPeA18.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 13, 2023Sample Tap Domel WTPground waterPFBA33.8 ppt5.0 ppt
Dec 13, 2023Sample Tap Domel WTPground waterPFBS7.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 13, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Rabbit Hill Intertiesurface waterPFBA23.2 ppt5.0 ppt
Dec 13, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Rabbit Hill Intertiesurface waterPFBS4.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 13, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Rabbit Hill Intertiesurface waterPFHxA3.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 13, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Rabbit Hill Intertiesurface waterPFHxS3.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 13, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Rabbit Hill Intertiesurface waterPFPeA5.8 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 13, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Rabbit Hill Intertiesurface waterLithium16.7 ppb9 ppb
Dec 13, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Kauffman Loop Intertiesurface waterPFBA23.0 ppt5.0 ppt
Dec 13, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Kauffman Loop Intertiesurface waterPFBS5.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 13, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Kauffman Loop Intertiesurface waterPFHxA3.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 13, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Kauffman Loop Intertiesurface waterPFHxS3.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 13, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Kauffman Loop Intertiesurface waterPFPeA5.8 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 13, 2023Entry Point to Dist. System Kauffman Loop Intertiesurface waterLithium17.4 ppb9 ppb
Dec 13, 2023Lab Tap Lake Georgetown WTPsurface waterPFBA22.3 ppt5.0 ppt
Dec 13, 2023Lab Tap Lake Georgetown WTPsurface waterPFBS4.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 13, 2023Lab Tap Lake Georgetown WTPsurface waterPFHxA3.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 13, 2023Lab Tap Lake Georgetown WTPsurface waterPFHxS3.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 13, 2023Lab Tap Lake Georgetown WTPsurface waterPFPeA5.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 13, 2023Lab Tap Lake Georgetown WTPsurface waterLithium17.3 ppb9 ppb
Dec 13, 2023Lab Tap San Gabriel Park WTPground water under surface-water influencePFBA7.7 ppt5.0 ppt
Dec 13, 2023Lab Tap San Gabriel Park WTPground water under surface-water influencePFBS9.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 13, 2023Lab Tap San Gabriel Park WTPground water under surface-water influencePFHxA3.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 13, 2023Lab Tap San Gabriel Park WTPground water under surface-water influencePFHxS3.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 13, 2023Lab Tap San Gabriel Park WTPground water under surface-water influencePFOS4.2 ppt4.0 ppt
Dec 13, 2023Lab Tap San Gabriel Park WTPground water under surface-water influencePFPeA6.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Mar 14, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Kauffman Loop Intertiesurface waterLithium11.9 ppb9 ppb
Mar 14, 2024Lab Tap Lake Georgetown WTPsurface waterPFBS3.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Mar 14, 2024Lab Tap Lake Georgetown WTPsurface waterPFPeA4.8 ppt3.0 ppt
Mar 14, 2024Lab Tap Lake Georgetown WTPsurface waterLithium13.4 ppb9 ppb
Mar 14, 2024Lab Tap San Gabriel Park WTPground water under surface-water influencePFBS7.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Mar 14, 2024Lab Tap San Gabriel Park WTPground water under surface-water influencePFPeA5.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Mar 14, 2024Sample Tap Southside WTPground water under surface-water influencePFBS6.8 ppt3.0 ppt
Mar 14, 2024Sample Tap Southside WTPground water under surface-water influencePFPeA4.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 11, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Kauffman Loop Intertiesurface waterPFPeA3.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 11, 2024Sample Tap Southside WTPground water under surface-water influencePFBA5.2 ppt5.0 ppt
Jun 11, 2024Sample Tap Southside WTPground water under surface-water influencePFBS5.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 11, 2024Sample Tap Southside WTPground water under surface-water influencePFPeA3.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 23, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Rabbit Hill Intertiesurface waterPFBA5.9 ppt5.0 ppt
Sep 23, 2024Entry Point to Dist. System Rabbit Hill Intertiesurface waterPFPeA3.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 23, 2024Sample Tap Southside WTPground water under surface-water influencePFBA6.1 ppt5.0 ppt
Sep 23, 2024Sample Tap Southside WTPground water under surface-water influencePFBS8.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 23, 2024Sample Tap Southside WTPground water under surface-water influencePFPeA5.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 10, 2024Sample Tap Southside WTPground water under surface-water influencePFBS6.8 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 10, 2024Sample Tap Southside WTPground water under surface-water influencePFPeA4.2 ppt3.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: no at 18 of 22 sampling events, not known at 4 of 22 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 16 of 22 sampling events, not known at 6 of 22 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Jun 30, 2023, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 2.2 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 15 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995: 5.3 ppbJan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1998: 4.5 ppbJan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001: 4.1 ppbJan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007: 5.3 ppbJan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010: 2.6 ppbJan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013: 2.7 ppbJan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016: 3.9 ppbJan 1, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017: 3.9 ppbJul 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017: 3.1 ppbJan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2020: 1.8 ppbJul 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022: 2.6 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Jun 30, 2023: 2.2 ppbDec 31, 1995Jun 30, 20232.2 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Jun 30, 2023, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 2.2 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (15 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Jun 30, 2023Lead2.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022Lead2.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2020Lead1.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017Lead3.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017Lead3.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead3.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead2.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead2.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead5.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001Lead4.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1998Lead4.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995Lead5.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 15 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Jun 30, 2023Lead2.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2022Lead2.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2020Lead1.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2017Lead3.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Jun 30, 2017Lead3.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead3.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead2.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead2.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead5.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001Lead4.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1998Lead4.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995Lead5.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1994 – Dec 31, 1994Lead4.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Jun 30, 1993Lead4.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead10.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 3 violations since Sep 3, 2016. 1 is health-based, meaning a contaminant or treatment rule was not met. The other 2 concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices. 1 is still open.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 3 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 1 health-based (a contaminant above its maximum contaminant level, a disinfectant above its maximum residual level, or a required treatment technique not met), 1 for monitoring or reporting, 1 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements); 1 is not yet resolved.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Apr 1, 2026 – Jun 30, 2026MCL · health-basedTthm (0.081 MG/L, limit 0.080 mg/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordUnaddressed · 2 enforcement actions
Oct 27, 2025OtherPublic NoticePublic Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Aug 1, 2024 – Aug 31, 2024MRLong Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Filter)1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Jul 30, 2025 (sanitary survey); 2 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 7 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 17.4 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records