Tap Water Lookup

EPA system VA2770900 · Virginia

Western Virginia Water Authority: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID VA2770900; community water system; Virginia; source: surface water; serves 182,700 people via 67,598 connections; status: active

In focus182,700people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 22.8 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.22.8 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled September 2023–June 2024. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Western Virginia Water Authority is a local-government-owned community water system in Virginia serving about 182,700 people, matched to 18 ZIP codes.

2.2 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
4 of 4 results at the highest location; highest single sample 8.9 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · below the MCL
4.8 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
2 of 2 results at the highest location; highest single sample 6.3 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · at or above the MCL
22.8 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
22 of 38 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
5 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
1,140 results, 15 entry points
1 at or above an MCL on the average basis
0 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
3
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
3 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: Granular activated carbon (4 of 18 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 18 of 40 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
  • PFOS EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOS at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOS exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFOA EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOA at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOA exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • HFPO-DA (GenX) EPA's 2021 toxicity assessment for GenX chemicals cites liver, kidney, immune and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 6. PFOS averaged 4.8 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. EPA's limit applies to a running yearly average and is enforced from 2029. That PFOS result is higher than 92% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it. Lithium reached 22.8 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between September 2023 and June 2024, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 1,140 samples from 15 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 6 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOA was 2.2 ppt, below the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 8.9 ppt). Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOS was 4.8 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 6.3 ppt). Lithium reached 22.8 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
22.8 ppb
at or above the health reference level
PFPeAhighest single sample
6.2 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFOScomplete-set average
4.8 ppt
at or above the MCL
PFOAcomplete-set average
2.2 ppt
below the MCL
HFPO-DA (GenX)complete-set average
1.5 ppt
below the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)
PFHxAhighest single sample
4.3 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 24 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium382222.8 ppb22.5 ppb (2 of 2)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFPeA3816.2 ppt3.1 ppt (2 of 2)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFOS3866.3 ppt4.8 ppt (2 of 2)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averageat or above the MCLSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFOA3818.9 ppt2.2 ppt (4 of 4)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the MCLSeptember 2023 – June 2024
HFPO-DA (GenX)3816.0 ppt1.5 ppt (4 of 4)10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)September 2023 – June 2024
PFHxA3814.3 ppt2.2 ppt (2 of 2)3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
11Cl-PF3OUdS380< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
4:2 FTS380< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
6:2 FTS380< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
8:2 FTS380< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
9Cl-PF3ONS380< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
ADONA380< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
NEtFOSAA380< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
NFDHA380< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
NMeFOSAA380< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFBA380< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFBS380< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFDA380< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFDoA380< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFEESA380< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFHpA380< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFHpS380< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFHxS380< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFMBA380< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFMPA380< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFNA380< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFPeS380< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFTA380< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFTrDA380< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
PFUnA380< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelSeptember 2023 – June 2024
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (32 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Sep 11, 2023Spring Hollow TF Finished Tap Spring Hollow Tfsurface waterHFPO-DA (GenX)6.0 ppt5.0 ppt
Sep 11, 2023Spring Hollow TF Finished Tap Spring Hollow Tfsurface waterPFOA8.9 ppt4.0 ppt
Sep 14, 2023Labellevue Well 7 Tap Labellevue Well 7ground waterLithium22.8 ppb9 ppb
Sep 14, 2023North Lakes 6 Well Tap North Lakes 6 Wellground waterPFHxA4.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 14, 2023North Lakes 6 Well Tap North Lakes 6 Wellground waterPFPeA6.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Sep 14, 2023North Lakes 6 Well Tap North Lakes 6 Wellground waterLithium18.5 ppb9 ppb
Sep 14, 2023Starkey Well 2 Tap Starkey 2 Wellground waterLithium11.7 ppb9 ppb
Sep 14, 2023Starkey 3 Well Tap Starkey 3 Wellground waterLithium11.2 ppb9 ppb
Sep 15, 2023MANSARD SQUARE WELL TAP Mansard Square Wellground waterLithium16.9 ppb9 ppb
Sep 15, 2023BUSH #1 WELL TAP Bush #1 Wellground waterPFOS4.6 ppt4.0 ppt
Sep 15, 2023BUSH #1 WELL TAP Bush #1 Wellground waterLithium22.4 ppb9 ppb
Sep 15, 2023BUSH #2 WELL TAP Bush #2 Wellground waterLithium19.3 ppb9 ppb
Sep 15, 2023STONEBRIDGE WELL TAP Stonebridge Wellground waterLithium17.9 ppb9 ppb
Sep 15, 2023SPRING GROVE WELL TAP Spring Grove Wellground waterLithium15.7 ppb9 ppb
Sep 15, 2023CRAIG AVE WELL TAP Craig Avenue Wellground waterLithium14.3 ppb9 ppb
Sep 15, 2023MELISSA WELL TAP Melissa Wellground waterLithium20.5 ppb9 ppb
Mar 20, 2024Labellevue Well 7 Tap Labellevue Well 7ground waterLithium22.1 ppb9 ppb
Mar 20, 2024North Lakes 6 Well Tap North Lakes 6 Wellground waterPFOS6.3 ppt4.0 ppt
Mar 20, 2024North Lakes 6 Well Tap North Lakes 6 Wellground waterLithium20.1 ppb9 ppb
Mar 20, 2024Starkey Well 2 Tap Starkey 2 Wellground waterLithium11.8 ppb9 ppb
Mar 20, 2024Starkey 3 Well Tap Starkey 3 Wellground waterLithium10.6 ppb9 ppb
Mar 20, 2024MANSARD SQUARE WELL TAP Mansard Square Wellground waterLithium16.3 ppb9 ppb
Mar 20, 2024BUSH #1 WELL TAP Bush #1 Wellground waterPFOS4.9 ppt4.0 ppt
Mar 20, 2024BUSH #1 WELL TAP Bush #1 Wellground waterLithium20.7 ppb9 ppb
Mar 20, 2024BUSH #2 WELL TAP Bush #2 Wellground waterLithium18.1 ppb9 ppb
Mar 20, 2024STONEBRIDGE WELL TAP Stonebridge Wellground waterLithium16.1 ppb9 ppb
Mar 20, 2024SPRING GROVE WELL TAP Spring Grove Wellground waterLithium15.8 ppb9 ppb
Mar 20, 2024CRAIG AVE WELL TAP Craig Avenue Wellground waterPFOS5.5 ppt4.0 ppt
Mar 20, 2024CRAIG AVE WELL TAP Craig Avenue Wellground waterLithium13.5 ppb9 ppb
Mar 20, 2024MELISSA WELL TAP Melissa Wellground waterPFOS4.1 ppt4.0 ppt
Mar 20, 2024MELISSA WELL TAP Melissa Wellground waterLithium21 ppb9 ppb
Mar 28, 2024MUSE SPRING FIN TAP Muse Spring Tpground water under surface-water influencePFOS4.7 ppt4.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 18 of 40 sampling events, not known at 14 of 40 sampling events, no at 8 of 40 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 34 of 40 sampling events, yes at 5 of 40 sampling events, not known at 1 of 40 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 14 of 18 sampling events, granular activated carbon at 4 of 18 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 0 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 8 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008: 4 ppbJan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011: 4 ppbJan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014: 2 ppbJan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017: 2.7 ppbJan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019: 1.5 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021: 1.5 ppbJan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022: 4.8 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025: 0 ppbDec 31, 2008Dec 31, 20250 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 0 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (8 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022Lead4.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead1.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019Lead1.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2017Lead2.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2014Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 3 violations since Sep 3, 2016. 3 are health-based, meaning a contaminant or treatment rule was not met.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 3 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 3 health-based (a contaminant above its maximum contaminant level, a disinfectant above its maximum residual level, or a required treatment technique not met).

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Jan 1, 2020 – Mar 31, 2020MCL · health-basedTthm (0.081 MG/L, limit 0.080 mg/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2019 – Sep 30, 2019MCL · health-basedTthm (91 UG/L, limit 80 UG/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2017 – Sep 30, 2017MCL · health-basedTotal Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) (62 UG/L, limit 60 UG/L)Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average1 recordResolved · 4 enforcement actions

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Oct 1, 2025 (reason not recorded); 11 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 5 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 22.8 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records