Tap Water Lookup

EPA system WA5338100 · Washington

Kennewick City of: PFOS at or above EPA's 4.0 ppt limit

System ID WA5338100; community water system; Washington; source: surface water; serves 118,164 people via 39,118 connections; status: active

In focus118,164people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referencePFOS
PFOS: 10.0 ppt; MCL 4.0 ppt. highest complete sampling-location average.10.0 pptMCL: 4.0 ppt

highest complete sampling-location average; sampled February 2023–January 2024. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Kennewick City of is a local-government-owned community water system in Washington serving about 118,164 people, matched to 3 ZIP codes.

2.2 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
4 of 4 results at the highest location; highest single sample 4.6 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · below the MCL
10.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
4 of 4 results at the highest location; highest single sample 11.5 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · at or above the MCL
9.4 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
1 of 8 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · below the health reference level
6 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
240 results, 2 entry points
2 at or above an MCL on the average basis
0 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
2 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (8 of 8 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 8 of 8 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • PFOS EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOS at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOS exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFHxS EPA's 2024 rule cites health effects assessments associating PFHxS with thyroid, liver and immune effects. EPA source
  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
  • PFOA EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOA at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOA exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 7. PFOS averaged 10.0 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. EPA's limit applies to a running yearly average and is enforced from 2029. That PFOS result is higher than 96% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it. Lithium reached 9.4 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between February 2023 and January 2024, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 240 samples from 2 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 7 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOA was 2.2 ppt, below the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 4.6 ppt). Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOS was 10.0 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 11.5 ppt). Lithium reached 9.4 ppb in a single sample, below the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
PFPeAhighest single sample
7.5 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFOScomplete-set average
10.0 ppt
at or above the MCL
PFHxScomplete-set average
10.1 ppt
at or above the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)
Lithiumhighest single sample
9.4 ppb
below the health reference level
PFOAcomplete-set average
2.2 ppt
below the MCL
PFBShighest single sample
6.4 ppt
below the health-based water concentration
PFHxAhighest single sample
6.5 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 23 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
PFPeA847.5 ppt6.9 ppt (4 of 4)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueFebruary 2023 – January 2024
PFOS8411.5 ppt10.0 ppt (4 of 4)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averageat or above the MCLFebruary 2023 – January 2024
PFHxS8410.6 ppt10.1 ppt (4 of 4)10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averageat or above the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)February 2023 – January 2024
Lithium819.4 ppb2.3 ppb (4 of 4)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest samplebelow the health reference levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFOA824.6 ppt2.2 ppt (4 of 4)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the MCLFebruary 2023 – January 2024
PFBS846.4 ppt5.4 ppt (4 of 4)2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplebelow the health-based water concentrationFebruary 2023 – January 2024
PFHxA846.5 ppt6.1 ppt (4 of 4)3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelFebruary 2023 – January 2024
11Cl-PF3OUdS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – January 2024
4:2 FTS80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – January 2024
6:2 FTS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – January 2024
8:2 FTS80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – January 2024
9Cl-PF3ONS80< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – January 2024
ADONA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – January 2024
HFPO-DA (GenX)80< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – January 2024
NEtFOSAA80< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
NFDHA80< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – January 2024
NMeFOSAA80< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFBA80< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – January 2024
PFDA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – January 2024
PFDoA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – January 2024
PFEESA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – January 2024
PFHpA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – January 2024
PFHpS80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – January 2024
PFMBA80< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – January 2024
PFMPA80< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – January 2024
PFNA80< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – January 2024
PFPeS80< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – January 2024
PFTA80< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFTrDA80< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – November 2023
PFUnA80< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – January 2024
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (23 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Feb 6, 2023RC 4 & 5 Combined FW Tap after Treatment Rc 4 & 5 Combined Finished Water Tapground water under surface-water influencePFBS4.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 6, 2023RC 4 & 5 Combined FW Tap after Treatment Rc 4 & 5 Combined Finished Water Tapground water under surface-water influencePFHxA5.8 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 6, 2023RC 4 & 5 Combined FW Tap after Treatment Rc 4 & 5 Combined Finished Water Tapground water under surface-water influencePFHxS10.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 6, 2023RC 4 & 5 Combined FW Tap after Treatment Rc 4 & 5 Combined Finished Water Tapground water under surface-water influencePFOS9.6 ppt4.0 ppt
Feb 6, 2023RC 4 & 5 Combined FW Tap after Treatment Rc 4 & 5 Combined Finished Water Tapground water under surface-water influencePFPeA6.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 7, 2023RC 4 & 5 Combined FW Tap after Treatment Rc 4 & 5 Combined Finished Water Tapground water under surface-water influencePFBS5.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 7, 2023RC 4 & 5 Combined FW Tap after Treatment Rc 4 & 5 Combined Finished Water Tapground water under surface-water influencePFHxA6.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 7, 2023RC 4 & 5 Combined FW Tap after Treatment Rc 4 & 5 Combined Finished Water Tapground water under surface-water influencePFHxS9.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 7, 2023RC 4 & 5 Combined FW Tap after Treatment Rc 4 & 5 Combined Finished Water Tapground water under surface-water influencePFOA4.6 ppt4.0 ppt
Aug 7, 2023RC 4 & 5 Combined FW Tap after Treatment Rc 4 & 5 Combined Finished Water Tapground water under surface-water influencePFOS10.5 ppt4.0 ppt
Aug 7, 2023RC 4 & 5 Combined FW Tap after Treatment Rc 4 & 5 Combined Finished Water Tapground water under surface-water influencePFPeA7.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Nov 7, 2023RC 4 & 5 Combined FW Tap after Treatment Rc 4 & 5 Combined Finished Water Tapground water under surface-water influencePFBS5.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Nov 7, 2023RC 4 & 5 Combined FW Tap after Treatment Rc 4 & 5 Combined Finished Water Tapground water under surface-water influencePFHxA5.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Nov 7, 2023RC 4 & 5 Combined FW Tap after Treatment Rc 4 & 5 Combined Finished Water Tapground water under surface-water influencePFHxS10.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Nov 7, 2023RC 4 & 5 Combined FW Tap after Treatment Rc 4 & 5 Combined Finished Water Tapground water under surface-water influencePFOS8.3 ppt4.0 ppt
Nov 7, 2023RC 4 & 5 Combined FW Tap after Treatment Rc 4 & 5 Combined Finished Water Tapground water under surface-water influencePFPeA6.8 ppt3.0 ppt
Nov 7, 2023RC 4 & 5 Combined FW Tap after Treatment Rc 4 & 5 Combined Finished Water Tapground water under surface-water influenceLithium9.4 ppb9 ppb
Jan 3, 2024RC 4 & 5 Combined FW Tap after Treatment Rc 4 & 5 Combined Finished Water Tapground water under surface-water influencePFBS6.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Jan 3, 2024RC 4 & 5 Combined FW Tap after Treatment Rc 4 & 5 Combined Finished Water Tapground water under surface-water influencePFHxA6.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Jan 3, 2024RC 4 & 5 Combined FW Tap after Treatment Rc 4 & 5 Combined Finished Water Tapground water under surface-water influencePFHxS10.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Jan 3, 2024RC 4 & 5 Combined FW Tap after Treatment Rc 4 & 5 Combined Finished Water Tapground water under surface-water influencePFOA4.3 ppt4.0 ppt
Jan 3, 2024RC 4 & 5 Combined FW Tap after Treatment Rc 4 & 5 Combined Finished Water Tapground water under surface-water influencePFOS11.5 ppt4.0 ppt
Jan 3, 2024RC 4 & 5 Combined FW Tap after Treatment Rc 4 & 5 Combined Finished Water Tapground water under surface-water influencePFPeA6.8 ppt3.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 8 of 8 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: not known at 8 of 8 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 8 of 8 sampling events.

Lead and copper at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 0 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. The action level has been reached in 1 of the 13 periods on record.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 1995 – Jun 30, 1995: 5 ppbJul 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995: 3 ppbJan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001: 2 ppbJan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004: 4 ppbJan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005: 3 ppbJan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2007: 3 ppbJan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010: 21.4 ppbJan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013: 2.2 ppbJan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016: 1.8 ppbJan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019: 1.6 ppbJan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022: 1.9 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025: 0 ppbJun 30, 1995Dec 31, 20250 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 0 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb; 1 of the 13 monitoring periods on record reached the action level. The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022Lead1.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019Lead1.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead1.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead2.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead21.4 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2007Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Jun 30, 1995Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 14 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022Lead1.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019Lead1.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead1.8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead2.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead21.4 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2007Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1995 – Jun 30, 1995Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Copper1,400 ppb1,300 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 2 violations since Sep 3, 2016. None is health-based. All concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices, not the water itself.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 2 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 2 for monitoring or reporting, none health-based.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Apr 1, 2023 – Jun 30, 2023MRTotal Haloacetic Acids (Haa5)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action
Apr 1, 2023 – Jun 30, 2023MRTthmMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Jun 13, 2023 (sanitary survey); 1 visit since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 6 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Filters certified for lead reduction

1 of this utility's 13 lead monitoring periods on record reached the 15 ppb action level (most recent 90th percentile 0 ppb).

NSF/ANSI 53 with a lead-reduction claim, or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. Lead comes from plumbing, so a point-of-use filter at the kitchen tap is the relevant type.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records