Tap Water Lookup

EPA system WA5379500 · Washington

Skagit County PUD 1 Judy Res: 1 PFAS found; PFBA up to 21.1 ppt, below the 6,000 ppt screening level

System ID WA5379500; community water system; Washington; source: surface water; serves 111,415 people via 31,993 connections; status: active

In focus111,415people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referencePFBA
PFBA: 21.1 ppt; screening level 6,000 ppt. highest single sample.21.1 pptscreening level: 6,000 ppt

highest single sample; sampled August 2024–May 2025. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Skagit County PUD 1 Judy Res is a local-government-owned community water system in Washington serving about 111,415 people, matched to 8 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
4 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
4 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 9 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
4 samples, none above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · not detected above the reporting level
1 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
120 results, 1 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
0 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2024
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
2 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (4 of 4 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 4 of 4 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • PFBA EPA's 2022 IRIS assessment for PFBA cites thyroid, liver and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 1.

Between August 2024 and May 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 120 samples from 1 sampling location for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 1 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
PFBAhighest single sample
21.1 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 29 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Lithiumnot detected · reporting level 9 ppb
< 9 ppb
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
PFBA4121.1 ppt5.3 ppt (4 of 4)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
11Cl-PF3OUdS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
4:2 FTS40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
6:2 FTS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
8:2 FTS40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
9Cl-PF3ONS40< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
ADONA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
HFPO-DA (GenX)40< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
Lithium40< 9 ppb10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
NEtFOSAA40< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
NFDHA40< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
NMeFOSAA40< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFBS40< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFDA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFDoA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFEESA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFHpA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFHpS40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFHxA40< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFHxS40< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFMBA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFMPA40< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFNA40< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFOA40< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFOS40< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFPeA40< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFPeS40< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFTA40< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFTrDA40< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
PFUnA40< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – May 2025
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (1 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
May 14, 2025Pumping Station Tap Judy Reservoirsurface waterPFBA21.1 ppt5.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 4 of 4 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 4 of 4 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 4 of 4 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 0 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. The action level has been reached in 1 of the 11 periods on record.

Action level 15 ppb015Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992: 49 ppbFeb 8, 1998 – Aug 8, 1998: 11 ppbAug 9, 1998 – Feb 7, 1999: 12 ppbJan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2003: 4 ppbJan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006: 3 ppbJan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009: 3 ppbJan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012: 2 ppbJan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015: 2 ppbJan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018: 2 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021: 1.5 ppbJan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024: 0 ppbDec 31, 1992Dec 31, 20240 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2024, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 0 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb; 1 of the 11 monitoring periods on record reached the action level. The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 31, 2024Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2021Lead1.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2015Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2009Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2006Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2003Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Aug 9, 1998 – Feb 7, 1999Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Feb 8, 1998 – Aug 8, 1998Lead11 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead49 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 2 violations since Sep 3, 2016. None is health-based. All concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices, not the water itself.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 2 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 1 for monitoring or reporting, 1 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements), none health-based.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Jan 1, 2026 – Jan 31, 2026MRSurface Water Treatment RuleMonitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Filter)1 recordResolved · 2 enforcement actions
Jul 1, 2024OtherConsumer Confidence RuleConsumer Confidence Report Complete Failure to Report1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Mar 20, 2025 (sanitary survey); 2 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 1 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Filters certified for lead reduction

1 of this utility's 11 lead monitoring periods on record reached the 15 ppb action level (most recent 90th percentile 0 ppb).

NSF/ANSI 53 with a lead-reduction claim, or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. Lead comes from plumbing, so a point-of-use filter at the kitchen tap is the relevant type.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records