Tap Water Lookup

EPA system CA3310012 · California

Elsinore Valley MWD: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID CA3310012; community water system; California; source: surface water; serves 169,455 people via 48,435 connections; status: active

In focus169,455people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 39 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.39 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled February 2023–December 2025. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Elsinore Valley MWD is a local-government-owned community water system in California serving about 169,455 people, matched to 22 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
22 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
22 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
39 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
12 of 22 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
1 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
656 results, 8 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
1.3 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
0 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: Another treatment (16 of 27 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 27 of 32 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
  • PFBA EPA's 2022 IRIS assessment for PFBA cites thyroid, liver and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 2. Lithium reached 39 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between February 2023 and December 2025, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 656 samples from 8 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 2 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Lithium reached 39 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
39 ppb
at or above the health reference level
PFBAhighest single sample
7.0 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 28 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium221239 ppb26 ppb (2 of 2)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
PFBA2227.0 ppt1.8 ppt (4 of 4)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
11Cl-PF3OUdS220< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
4:2 FTS220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
6:2 FTS220< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
8:2 FTS220< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
9Cl-PF3ONS220< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
ADONA220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
HFPO-DA (GenX)220< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
NEtFOSAA210< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
NFDHA220< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
NMeFOSAA210< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
PFBS220< 3.0 ppt2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
PFDA220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
PFDoA220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
PFEESA220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
PFHpA220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
PFHpS220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
PFHxA220< 3.0 ppt3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
PFHxS220< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
PFMBA220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
PFMPA220< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
PFNA220< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
PFOA220< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
PFOS220< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
PFPeA220< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
PFPeS220< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
PFTA210< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
PFTrDA210< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
PFUnA220< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelFebruary 2023 – December 2025
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (14 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Feb 16, 2023Machado Blend EPTDS Machado Blend Stationground waterLithium13 ppb9 ppb
Feb 16, 2023MWD-SKINNER EPTDS Auld Valley Pipeline (Avp Em-17)surface waterLithium15 ppb9 ppb
Feb 16, 2023Terra Cotta EPTDS Terra Cotta Wellground waterLithium12 ppb9 ppb
May 18, 2023MWD-SKINNER EPTDS Auld Valley Pipeline (Avp Em-17)surface waterPFBA7.0 ppt5.0 ppt
May 18, 2023MWD-SKINNER EPTDS Auld Valley Pipeline (Avp Em-17)surface waterLithium39 ppb9 ppb
May 18, 2023TVP_CWPS_Flagler WTF Blend EPTDS Northern Tvp Blendingmixed ground and surface waterPFBA5.0 ppt5.0 ppt
May 18, 2023Maitri Blend EPTDS Northern Temescal Blendingground waterLithium24 ppb9 ppb
Aug 22, 2023Terra Cotta EPTDS Terra Cotta Wellground waterLithium12 ppb9 ppb
Aug 31, 2023MWD-SKINNER EPTDS Auld Valley Pipeline (Avp Em-17)surface waterLithium21 ppb9 ppb
Nov 22, 2023MWD-SKINNER EPTDS Auld Valley Pipeline (Avp Em-17)surface waterLithium24 ppb9 ppb
Jul 25, 2024Maitri Blend EPTDS Northern Temescal Blendingground waterLithium28 ppb9 ppb
May 29, 2025Machado Blend EPTDS Machado Blend Stationground waterLithium17 ppb9 ppb
Sep 11, 2025Palomar Blend EPTDS Palomar Well Blend Stationmixed ground and surface waterLithium26 ppb9 ppb
Dec 8, 2025Palomar Blend EPTDS Palomar Well Blend Stationmixed ground and surface waterLithium22 ppb9 ppb

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 27 of 32 sampling events, no at 5 of 32 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: not known at 32 of 32 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: another treatment at 16 of 27 sampling events, no PFAS treatment at 11 of 27 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 1.3 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 20 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2003: 0 ppbJan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003: 5 ppbJan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004: 0 ppbJan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004: 5 ppbJan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005: 0 ppbJan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007: 0 ppbJan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010: 0 ppbJan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013: 0 ppbJan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016: 0 ppbJan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019: 0 ppbJan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022: 1.2 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025: 1.3 ppbDec 31, 2003Dec 31, 20251.3 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 1.3 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (20 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead1.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022Lead1.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2003Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 20 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead1.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022Lead1.2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2005Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2003Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1996Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1994Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists no drinking-water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.

EPA's SDWIS database lists no drinking water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.

None on file.

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Apr 25, 2024 (sanitary survey); 1 visit since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 1 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 39 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records