Tap Water Lookup

EPA system CA3410001 · California

Sacramento Suburban Water District: Lithium at or above EPA's 10 ppb health reference level

System ID CA3410001; community water system; California; source: purchased surface water; serves 194,444 people via 46,996 connections; status: active

In focus194,444people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referenceLithium
Lithium: 60 ppb; health reference level 10 ppb. highest single sample.60 ppbhealth reference level: 10 ppb

highest single sample; sampled May 2024–April 2026. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Sacramento Suburban Water District is a local-government-owned community water system in California serving about 194,444 people, matched to 14 ZIP codes.

< 4.0 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
116 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
< 4.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
116 samples, none above the reporting level
MCL 4.0 ppt · not detected above the reporting level
60 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
25 of 116 samples above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · at or above the health reference level
4 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
3,480 results, 58 entry points
0 at or above an MCL on the average basis
0 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 31, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
0 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (106 of 106 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 106 of 120 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • Lithium EPA's health reference level is derived from a 2008 provisional toxicity value based on effects seen at therapeutic lithium doses; EPA notes the assessment is provisional. EPA source
  • PFBS EPA's 2021 PFBS toxicity assessment cites thyroid, kidney and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source
  • PFHxA EPA's 2023 IRIS assessment for PFHxA cites developmental, liver and blood effects in animal studies. EPA source
  • PFHxS EPA's 2024 rule cites health effects assessments associating PFHxS with thyroid, liver and immune effects. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 5. Lithium reached 60 ppb; EPA's health reference level, which is guidance and not a limit, is 10 ppb.

Between May 2024 and April 2026, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 3,480 samples from 58 sampling locations for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 5 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Lithium reached 60 ppb in a single sample, at or above the health reference level of 10 ppb, which is non-regulatory.

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
Lithiumhighest single sample
60 ppb
at or above the health reference level
PFPeAhighest single sample
7.1 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFBShighest single sample
4.7 ppt
below the health-based water concentration
PFHxAhighest single sample
5.7 ppt
below the screening level
PFHxScomplete-set average
0.0 ppt
below the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)
Show the 25 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFBAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFOSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
Lithium1162560 ppb58 ppb (2 of 2)10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest sampleat or above the health reference levelMay 2024 – April 2026
PFPeA11657.1 ppt4.6 ppt (2 of 2)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueMay 2024 – April 2026
PFBS11614.7 ppt0.0 ppt (4 of 4)2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplebelow the health-based water concentrationMay 2024 – April 2026
PFHxA11645.7 ppt3.5 ppt (2 of 2)3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelMay 2024 – April 2026
PFHxS11615.8 ppt0.0 ppt (4 of 4)10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)May 2024 – April 2026
11Cl-PF3OUdS1160< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2024 – April 2026
4:2 FTS1160< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2024 – April 2026
6:2 FTS1160< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2024 – April 2026
8:2 FTS1160< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2024 – April 2026
9Cl-PF3ONS1160< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2024 – April 2026
ADONA1160< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2024 – April 2026
HFPO-DA (GenX)1160< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMay 2024 – April 2026
NEtFOSAA1160< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2024 – April 2026
NFDHA1160< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2024 – April 2026
NMeFOSAA1160< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2024 – April 2026
PFBA1160< 5.0 ppt6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelMay 2024 – April 2026
PFDA1160< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2024 – April 2026
PFDoA1160< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2024 – April 2026
PFEESA1160< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2024 – April 2026
PFHpA1160< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2024 – April 2026
PFHpS1160< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2024 – April 2026
PFMBA1160< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2024 – April 2026
PFMPA1160< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2024 – April 2026
PFNA1160< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMay 2024 – April 2026
PFOA1160< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMay 2024 – April 2026
PFOS1160< 4.0 ppt4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelMay 2024 – April 2026
PFPeS1160< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2024 – April 2026
PFTA1160< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2024 – April 2026
PFTrDA1160< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2024 – April 2026
PFUnA1160< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelMay 2024 – April 2026
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (36 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
May 21, 2024EP# 221 - Well N32A Treated Well N32a (Poker Lane)ground waterLithium42 ppb9 ppb
May 21, 2024EP #222 - Well N32B Treated Well N32b (Poker Lane)ground waterLithium44 ppb9 ppb
May 23, 2024EP #197 - Well 55A Treated Well 55a (Stewart/Lynndale)ground waterPFHxA3.1 ppt3.0 ppt
May 29, 2024EP# 263 - Well 79 Treated Well 79 (Verner/Panorama)ground waterLithium16 ppb9 ppb
Jun 4, 2024EP #235 - Well 52 Treated Well 52 (Weddigen/Grrothberg)ground waterLithium29 ppb9 ppb
Jun 4, 2024EP #238 - Well 56A Treated Well 56a (Fairbain/Karl)ground waterLithium45 ppb9 ppb
Jun 4, 2024EP# 239 - Well 59A Treated Well 59a (Bainbridge/Holmes School)ground waterLithium46 ppb9 ppb
Jun 5, 2024EP# 215 - Well N25 Treated Well N25 (Sutter)ground waterPFHxA3.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 5, 2024EP# 215 - Well N25 Treated Well N25 (Sutter)ground waterPFPeA5.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Jun 5, 2024EP #216 - Well N26 Treated Well N26 (Monument)ground waterLithium24 ppb9 ppb
Jun 5, 2024EP #224 - Well N34 Treated Well N34 (Cottage)ground waterLithium60 ppb9 ppb
Jun 11, 2024EP #214 - Well N24 Treated Well N24 (Don Julio)ground waterLithium21 ppb9 ppb
Jun 12, 2024EP# 201 - Well N5 Treated Well N5 (Hillsdale)ground waterLithium13 ppb9 ppb
Jun 13, 2024EP #198 - Well N35 Treated Well N35 (Antelope North)ground waterLithium57 ppb9 ppb
Jun 13, 2024EP# 241 - Well N36 Treated Well N36 (Verner)ground waterLithium14 ppb9 ppb
Jul 16, 2024EP #203 - Well N7 Treated Well N7 (Rosebud)ground waterPFBS4.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 16, 2024EP #203 - Well N7 Treated Well N7 (Rosebud)ground waterPFHxA5.7 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 16, 2024EP #203 - Well N7 Treated Well N7 (Rosebud)ground waterPFHxS5.8 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 16, 2024EP #203 - Well N7 Treated Well N7 (Rosebud)ground waterPFPeA7.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Jul 16, 2024EP# 206 - Well N10 Treated Well N10 (Walnut)ground waterPFPeA4.3 ppt3.0 ppt
Jan 7, 2025EP #198 - Well N35 Treated Well N35 (Antelope North)ground waterLithium56 ppb9 ppb
Jan 7, 2025EP# 206 - Well N10 Treated Well N10 (Walnut)ground waterPFPeA3.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Jan 7, 2025EP #216 - Well N26 Treated Well N26 (Monument)ground waterLithium22 ppb9 ppb
Jan 7, 2025EP# 221 - Well N32A Treated Well N32a (Poker Lane)ground waterLithium40 ppb9 ppb
Jan 7, 2025EP #222 - Well N32B Treated Well N32b (Poker Lane)ground waterLithium43 ppb9 ppb
Jan 8, 2025EP #214 - Well N24 Treated Well N24 (Don Julio)ground waterLithium17 ppb9 ppb
Jan 8, 2025EP# 215 - Well N25 Treated Well N25 (Sutter)ground waterPFHxA3.4 ppt3.0 ppt
Jan 8, 2025EP# 215 - Well N25 Treated Well N25 (Sutter)ground waterPFPeA4.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Jan 8, 2025EP #224 - Well N34 Treated Well N34 (Cottage)ground waterLithium56 ppb9 ppb
Jan 8, 2025EP #235 - Well 52 Treated Well 52 (Weddigen/Grrothberg)ground waterLithium30 ppb9 ppb
Jan 8, 2025EP #238 - Well 56A Treated Well 56a (Fairbain/Karl)ground waterLithium43 ppb9 ppb
Jan 8, 2025EP# 239 - Well 59A Treated Well 59a (Bainbridge/Holmes School)ground waterLithium45 ppb9 ppb
Jan 9, 2025EP# 241 - Well N36 Treated Well N36 (Verner)ground waterLithium16 ppb9 ppb
Jan 9, 2025EP# 263 - Well 79 Treated Well 79 (Verner/Panorama)ground waterLithium13 ppb9 ppb
Oct 17, 2025EP# 237 - Well 64 Treated Well 64 (Galbrath/Antelope Woods)ground waterLithium36 ppb9 ppb
Apr 23, 2026EP# 237 - Well 64 Treated Well 64 (Galbrath/Antelope Woods)ground waterLithium40 ppb9 ppb

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 106 of 120 sampling events, no at 14 of 120 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 116 of 120 sampling events, yes at 4 of 120 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 106 of 106 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 0 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. None of the 19 periods on record reached it.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001: 0 ppbJan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001: 2 ppbJan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004: 2.5 ppbJan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004: 2.5 ppbJan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005: 7.9 ppbJan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007: 7.9 ppbJan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010: 0 ppbJan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013: 0 ppbJan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016: 0 ppbJan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019: 0 ppbJan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022: 0 ppbJan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025: 0 ppbDec 31, 2001Dec 31, 20250 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 31, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 0 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb (19 monitoring periods on record, none at the action level). The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead7.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005Lead7.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead2.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004Lead2.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 19 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2025Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2022Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007Lead7.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005Lead7.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead2.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004Lead2.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 2001Lead0 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead2 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead1.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997Lead1.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1996Lead4.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1994 – Dec 31, 1994Lead1.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Dec 31, 1993Lead2.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead4.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead1.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists no drinking-water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.

EPA's SDWIS database lists no drinking water violations for this utility since Sep 3, 2016.

None on file.

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Apr 17, 2024 (sanitary survey); 3 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 4 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Lithium: what reduces it

Lithium reached 60 ppb in a single sample, at or above EPA's non-regulatory 10 ppb health reference level.

No NSF/ANSI certification claim exists for lithium. Reverse osmosis systems reduce dissolved minerals generally; we do not recommend a specific product for lithium.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records