Tap Water Lookup

EPA system FL4130901 · Florida

Miami Beach, City of: PFOS at or above EPA's 4.0 ppt limit

System ID FL4130901; community water system; Florida; source: purchased groundwater; serves 100,000 people via 14,800 connections; status: active

In focus100,000people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referencePFOS
PFOS: 12.0 ppt; MCL 4.0 ppt. highest complete sampling-location average.12.0 pptMCL: 4.0 ppt

highest complete sampling-location average; sampled July 2023–February 2024. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

Miami Beach, City of is a local-government-owned community water system in Florida serving about 100,000 people, matched to 4 ZIP codes.

3.9 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
2 of 2 results at the highest location; highest single sample 7.8 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · below the MCL
12.0 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
2 of 2 results at the highest location; highest single sample 24.0 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · at or above the MCL
< 9 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
2 samples, none above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · not detected above the reporting level
10 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
60 results, 1 entry points
1 at or above an MCL on the average basis
7 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 1, 2025
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
16 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (2 of 2 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 2 of 2 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • PFOS EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOS at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOS exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFOA EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOA at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOA exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFHxS EPA's 2024 rule cites health effects assessments associating PFHxS with thyroid, liver and immune effects. EPA source
  • PFHxA EPA's 2023 IRIS assessment for PFHxA cites developmental, liver and blood effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 10. PFOS averaged 12.0 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. EPA's limit applies to a running yearly average and is enforced from 2029. That PFOS result is higher than 97% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it.

Between July 2023 and February 2024, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 60 samples from 1 sampling location for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 10 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOA was 3.9 ppt, below the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 7.8 ppt). Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOS was 12.0 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 24.0 ppt).

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
6:2 FTShighest single sample
89.0 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFPeAhighest single sample
27.0 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFHpAhighest single sample
11.0 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFOScomplete-set average
12.0 ppt
at or above the MCL
8:2 FTShighest single sample
5.3 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFOAcomplete-set average
3.9 ppt
below the MCL
PFHxScomplete-set average
2.8 ppt
below the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)
PFHxAhighest single sample
28.0 ppt
below the screening level
PFBAhighest single sample
15.0 ppt
below the screening level
PFBShighest single sample
3.5 ppt
below the health-based water concentration
Show the 20 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Lithiumnot detected · reporting level 9 ppb
< 9 ppb
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
6:2 FTS2189.0 ppt44.5 ppt (2 of 2)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueJuly 2023 – February 2024
PFPeA2127.0 ppt13.5 ppt (2 of 2)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueJuly 2023 – February 2024
PFHpA2111.0 ppt5.5 ppt (2 of 2)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueJuly 2023 – February 2024
PFOS2124.0 ppt12.0 ppt (2 of 2)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averageat or above the MCLJuly 2023 – February 2024
8:2 FTS215.3 ppt2.7 ppt (2 of 2)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueJuly 2023 – February 2024
PFOA217.8 ppt3.9 ppt (2 of 2)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the MCLJuly 2023 – February 2024
PFHxS215.6 ppt2.8 ppt (2 of 2)10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagebelow the 2024 MCL (rescission proposed)July 2023 – February 2024
PFHxA2128.0 ppt14.0 ppt (2 of 2)3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelJuly 2023 – February 2024
PFBA2115.0 ppt7.5 ppt (2 of 2)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelJuly 2023 – February 2024
PFBS213.5 ppt1.8 ppt (2 of 2)2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplebelow the health-based water concentrationJuly 2023 – February 2024
11Cl-PF3OUdS20< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2023 – February 2024
4:2 FTS20< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2023 – February 2024
9Cl-PF3ONS20< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2023 – February 2024
ADONA20< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2023 – February 2024
HFPO-DA (GenX)20< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2023 – February 2024
Lithium20< 9 ppb10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2023 – February 2024
NEtFOSAA20< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2023 – February 2024
NFDHA20< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2023 – February 2024
NMeFOSAA20< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2023 – February 2024
PFDA20< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2023 – February 2024
PFDoA20< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2023 – February 2024
PFEESA20< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2023 – February 2024
PFHpS20< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2023 – February 2024
PFMBA20< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2023 – February 2024
PFMPA20< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2023 – February 2024
PFNA20< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2023 – February 2024
PFPeS20< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2023 – February 2024
PFTA20< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2023 – February 2024
PFTrDA20< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2023 – February 2024
PFUnA20< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJuly 2023 – February 2024
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (10 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Feb 5, 202436th St Chlorinator/ Distribution Entry Point Consecutive Connectionground water6:2 FTS89.0 ppt5.0 ppt
Feb 5, 202436th St Chlorinator/ Distribution Entry Point Consecutive Connectionground water8:2 FTS5.3 ppt5.0 ppt
Feb 5, 202436th St Chlorinator/ Distribution Entry Point Consecutive Connectionground waterPFBA15.0 ppt5.0 ppt
Feb 5, 202436th St Chlorinator/ Distribution Entry Point Consecutive Connectionground waterPFBS3.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 5, 202436th St Chlorinator/ Distribution Entry Point Consecutive Connectionground waterPFHpA11.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 5, 202436th St Chlorinator/ Distribution Entry Point Consecutive Connectionground waterPFHxA28.0 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 5, 202436th St Chlorinator/ Distribution Entry Point Consecutive Connectionground waterPFHxS5.6 ppt3.0 ppt
Feb 5, 202436th St Chlorinator/ Distribution Entry Point Consecutive Connectionground waterPFOA7.8 ppt4.0 ppt
Feb 5, 202436th St Chlorinator/ Distribution Entry Point Consecutive Connectionground waterPFOS24.0 ppt4.0 ppt
Feb 5, 202436th St Chlorinator/ Distribution Entry Point Consecutive Connectionground waterPFPeA27.0 ppt3.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 2 of 2 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: yes at 2 of 2 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 2 of 2 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 1, 2025, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 7 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. The action level has been reached in 2 of the 21 periods on record.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999: 8 ppbJan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000: 6 ppbJan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001: 8 ppbJan 1, 2002 – Dec 1, 2004: 10 ppbJan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004: 10 ppbJan 1, 2008 – Dec 1, 2008: 8 ppbJan 1, 2010 – Dec 1, 2010: 7 ppbJan 1, 2013 – Dec 1, 2013: 3.3 ppbJan 1, 2016 – Dec 1, 2016: 2.3 ppbJan 1, 2019 – Dec 1, 2019: 1.9 ppbJan 1, 2022 – Dec 1, 2022: 2.5 ppbJan 1, 2025 – Dec 1, 2025: 7 ppbDec 31, 1999Dec 1, 20257 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 1, 2025, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 7 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb; 2 of the 21 monitoring periods on record reached the action level. The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 1, 2025Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 1, 2022Lead2.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 1, 2019Lead1.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 1, 2016Lead2.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 1, 2013Lead3.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 1, 2010Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 1, 2008Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 1, 2004Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 21 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 1, 2025Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2022 – Dec 1, 2022Lead2.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 1, 2019Lead1.9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 1, 2016Lead2.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2013 – Dec 1, 2013Lead3.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 1, 2010Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 1, 2008Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2004Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 1, 2004Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead8 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Jun 30, 1998Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Jun 30, 1997Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1996Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1996 – Jun 30, 1996Lead33.4 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Jun 30, 1993Lead14 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead27 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 16 violations since Sep 3, 2016. None is health-based. All concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices, not the water itself. 1 is still open.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 16 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 16 for monitoring or reporting, none health-based; 1 is not yet resolved.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Mar 1, 2025 – Mar 31, 2025MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2025 – Mar 31, 2025MRTthmMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2025 – Mar 31, 2025MRTotal Haloacetic Acids (Haa5)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordArchived
Jul 1, 2024 – Sep 30, 2024MRTotal Haloacetic Acids (Haa5)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordArchived
Jul 1, 2024 – Sep 30, 2024MRTthmMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordArchived
Jun 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordArchived
May 1, 2024 – May 31, 2024MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordArchived
Apr 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024MRTotal Haloacetic Acids (Haa5)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordArchived
Apr 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024MRTthmMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2024 – Mar 31, 2024MRTthmMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordArchived
Oct 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023MRTotal Haloacetic Acids (Haa5)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordArchived
Oct 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023MRTthmMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordArchived
Jul 1, 2023 – Sep 30, 2023MRTthmMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordArchived
Jul 1, 2023 – Sep 30, 2023MRTotal Haloacetic Acids (Haa5)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2020MRLead and Copper RuleFollow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/R1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action
Jan 1, 2017MRLead and Copper RuleFollow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/R1 recordUnaddressed

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Nov 5, 2025 (reason not recorded); 4 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 10 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Filters certified for lead reduction

2 of this utility's 21 lead monitoring periods on record reached the 15 ppb action level (most recent 90th percentile 7 ppb).

NSF/ANSI 53 with a lead-reduction claim, or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. Lead comes from plumbing, so a point-of-use filter at the kitchen tap is the relevant type.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records