Tap Water Lookup

EPA system FL4131618 · Florida

North Miami Beach: PFOS at or above EPA's 4.0 ppt limit

System ID FL4131618; community water system; Florida; source: groundwater; serves 180,000 people via 33,428 connections; status: active

In focus180,000people served, EPA registry
Public records. Clearer context.
Highest result against its EPA referencePFOS
PFOS: 18.5 ppt; MCL 4.0 ppt. highest complete sampling-location average.18.5 pptMCL: 4.0 ppt

highest complete sampling-location average; sampled August 2024–December 2024. Source: EPA UCMR 5 final release, August 2026.

North Miami Beach is a local-government-owned community water system in Florida serving about 180,000 people, matched to 12 ZIP codes.

5.3 ppt
PFOA, highest complete-set average
2 of 2 results at the highest location; highest single sample 5.3 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · at or above the MCL
18.5 ppt
PFOS, highest complete-set average
2 of 2 results at the highest location; highest single sample 20.0 ppt
MCL 4.0 ppt · at or above the MCL
< 9 ppb
Lithium, highest single sample
2 samples, none above the reporting level
health reference level 10 ppb · not detected above the reporting level
6 / 29
PFAS found above the reporting level
60 results, 1 entry points
2 at or above an MCL on the average basis
2.1 ppb
Lead 90th percentile
period ending Dec 1, 2024
action level 15 ppb · below the action level
0
health-based violations since Sep 3, 2016
9 violations in total

PFAS treatment declared to EPA: None declared (2 of 2 sampling events) · PFAS found before UCMR 5: Yes, at 2 of 2 sampling events

What EPA says about what was found

  • PFOS EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOS at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOS exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFOA EPA set the health goal (MCLG) for PFOA at zero. EPA's 2024 rule cites its health effects assessment linking PFOA exposure to certain cancers, immune and developmental effects, and changes in cholesterol. EPA source
  • PFBS EPA's 2021 PFBS toxicity assessment cites thyroid, kidney and developmental effects in animal studies. EPA source
  • PFHxA EPA's 2023 IRIS assessment for PFHxA cites developmental, liver and blood effects in animal studies. EPA source

Quoted from EPA assessments. This site adds no health claims of its own.

PFAS and lithium: what EPA's national survey found

EPA tested this water for 30 substances and found 6. PFOA averaged 5.3 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt, and PFOS averaged 18.5 ppt where EPA's limit is 4.0 ppt. EPA's limit applies to a running yearly average and is enforced from 2029. That PFOS result is higher than 99% of the 10,307 water systems EPA tested for it.

Between June 2024 and December 2024, EPA's UCMR 5 program tested 60 samples from 1 sampling location for 30 contaminants (29 PFAS plus lithium). 6 were detected above the reporting level in at least one sample. Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOA was 5.3 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 5.3 ppt). Averaged over a complete monitoring set, the highest sampling location for PFOS was 18.5 ppt, at or above the MCL of 4.0 ppt that applies from 2029 (highest single sample 20.0 ppt).

Result EPA comparesNot detected, shown at the reporting levelEPA reference value, at the middle of each row's scale
ContaminantResult against the EPA referenceResultStatus
PFOScomplete-set average
18.5 ppt
at or above the MCL
PFPeAhighest single sample
7.4 ppt
detected; no EPA reference value
PFOAcomplete-set average
5.3 ppt
at or above the MCL
PFBShighest single sample
6.9 ppt
below the health-based water concentration
PFHxAhighest single sample
4.9 ppt
below the screening level
PFBAhighest single sample
5.4 ppt
below the screening level
Show the 24 contaminants not detected above the reporting level
11Cl-PF3OUdSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
4:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
6:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
8:2 FTSnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
9Cl-PF3ONSnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
ADONAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
HFPO-DA (GenX)not detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Lithiumnot detected · reporting level 9 ppb
< 9 ppb
not detected above the reporting level
NEtFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 5.0 ppt
< 5.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NFDHAnot detected · reporting level 20.0 ppt
< 20.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
NMeFOSAAnot detected · reporting level 6.0 ppt
< 6.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFDoAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFEESAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHpSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFHxSnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMBAnot detected · reporting level 3.0 ppt
< 3.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFMPAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFNAnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFPeSnot detected · reporting level 4.0 ppt
< 4.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTAnot detected · reporting level 8.0 ppt
< 8.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFTrDAnot detected · reporting level 7.0 ppt
< 7.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
PFUnAnot detected · reporting level 2.0 ppt
< 2.0 ppt
not detected above the reporting level
Full table: samples, detections, highest single sample, complete-set average and sampling dates for all 30 contaminants
ContaminantSamplesDetectionsHighest single sampleComplete-set average (results used)EPA referenceStatusSampled
PFOS2220.0 ppt18.5 ppt (2 of 2)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averageat or above the MCLAugust 2024 – December 2024
PFPeA227.4 ppt7.3 ppt (2 of 2)none setdetected; no EPA reference valueAugust 2024 – December 2024
PFOA225.3 ppt5.3 ppt (2 of 2)4.0 ppt MCL · compared on the complete-set averageat or above the MCLAugust 2024 – December 2024
PFBS226.9 ppt6.7 ppt (2 of 2)2,000 ppt health-based water concentration · compared on the highest samplebelow the health-based water concentrationAugust 2024 – December 2024
PFHxA224.9 ppt4.6 ppt (2 of 2)3,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelAugust 2024 – December 2024
PFBA225.4 ppt5.3 ppt (2 of 2)6,000 ppt screening level · compared on the highest samplebelow the screening levelAugust 2024 – December 2024
11Cl-PF3OUdS20< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – December 2024
4:2 FTS20< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – December 2024
6:2 FTS20< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – December 2024
8:2 FTS20< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – December 2024
9Cl-PF3ONS20< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – December 2024
ADONA20< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – December 2024
HFPO-DA (GenX)20< 5.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – December 2024
Lithium20< 9 ppb10 ppb health reference level · compared on the highest samplenot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – December 2024
NEtFOSAA20< 5.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – December 2024
NFDHA20< 20.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – December 2024
NMeFOSAA20< 6.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – December 2024
PFDA20< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – December 2024
PFDoA20< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – December 2024
PFEESA20< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – December 2024
PFHpA20< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – December 2024
PFHpS20< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – December 2024
PFHxS20< 3.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – December 2024
PFMBA20< 3.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – December 2024
PFMPA20< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – December 2024
PFNA20< 4.0 ppt10.0 ppt MCL (rescission proposed) · compared on the complete-set averagenot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – December 2024
PFPeS20< 4.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – December 2024
PFTA20< 8.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – December 2024
PFTrDA20< 7.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelJune 2024 – December 2024
PFUnA20< 2.0 pptnone setnot detected above the reporting levelAugust 2024 – December 2024
UCMR 5 is a one-time national monitoring survey. Its results do not indicate compliance or non-compliance with the PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels, which are enforced on running annual averages and take effect in 2029 (EPA has proposed allowing extensions to 2031). A single result above a limit on this page is a measurement, not a violation.

Sampling-point average: mean of a location's two (ground water) or four (surface water) UCMR 5 results with non-detects counted as zero, EPA's method for comparing UCMR 5 data to the PFAS MCLs. EPA rounds to the reference value's significant digits before deciding whether an average is "greater than" an MCL (PFOA/PFOS averages count as above 4.0 ng/L only from 4.05 ng/L; lithium results count as above the 10 ppb reference only from 15 ppb). This site does not apply that rounding: "at or above" here means the measured value is numerically at or above the reference.

Every detection by sampling location (12 results)
DateSampling locationSource waterContaminantResultReporting level
Aug 1, 2024Sample Tap at WTP Norwood Water Tpground waterPFBA5.4 ppt5.0 ppt
Aug 1, 2024Sample Tap at WTP Norwood Water Tpground waterPFBS6.5 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 1, 2024Sample Tap at WTP Norwood Water Tpground waterPFHxA4.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Aug 1, 2024Sample Tap at WTP Norwood Water Tpground waterPFOA5.3 ppt4.0 ppt
Aug 1, 2024Sample Tap at WTP Norwood Water Tpground waterPFOS17.0 ppt4.0 ppt
Aug 1, 2024Sample Tap at WTP Norwood Water Tpground waterPFPeA7.1 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 2, 2024Sample Tap at WTP Norwood Water Tpground waterPFBA5.2 ppt5.0 ppt
Dec 2, 2024Sample Tap at WTP Norwood Water Tpground waterPFBS6.9 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 2, 2024Sample Tap at WTP Norwood Water Tpground waterPFHxA4.2 ppt3.0 ppt
Dec 2, 2024Sample Tap at WTP Norwood Water Tpground waterPFOA5.3 ppt4.0 ppt
Dec 2, 2024Sample Tap at WTP Norwood Water Tpground waterPFOS20.0 ppt4.0 ppt
Dec 2, 2024Sample Tap at WTP Norwood Water Tpground waterPFPeA7.4 ppt3.0 ppt

Utility-reported context (UCMR 5 questionnaire, aggregated across sampling events): PFAS previously found at this system: yes at 2 of 2 sampling events; potential PFAS sources nearby: no at 2 of 2 sampling events; PFAS treatment in place: no PFAS treatment at 2 of 2 sampling events.

Lead at customer taps

In the latest completed monitoring period, ending Dec 1, 2024, 9 in 10 sampled homes had lead at or below 2.1 ppb, below the 15 ppb action level that triggers utility action. The action level has been reached in 2 of the 29 periods on record.

Action level 15 ppb015Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004: 3.7 ppbJan 1, 2006 – Dec 1, 2006: 4.4 ppbJan 1, 2007 – Dec 1, 2007: 4.5 ppbJan 1, 2008 – Jun 1, 2008: 3 ppbJan 1, 2009 – Dec 1, 2009: 4 ppbJan 1, 2010 – Dec 1, 2010: 3 ppbJan 1, 2011 – Dec 1, 2011: 1 ppbJan 1, 2012 – Dec 1, 2012: 3.6 ppbJan 1, 2015 – Dec 1, 2015: 3.6 ppbJan 1, 2018 – Dec 1, 2018: 2.1 ppbJan 1, 2021 – Dec 1, 2021: 3.4 ppbJan 1, 2024 – Dec 1, 2024: 2.1 ppbDec 31, 2004Dec 1, 20242.1 ppb

In the most recent completed lead monitoring period, ending Dec 1, 2024, the 90th-percentile lead result at customer taps was 2.1 ppb, below the action level of 15 ppb; 2 of the 29 monitoring periods on record reached the action level. The 90th percentile is the value that 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below. Values are in parts per billion (ppb).

Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2024 – Dec 1, 2024Lead2.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 1, 2021Lead3.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 1, 2018Lead2.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 1, 2015Lead3.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 1, 2012Lead3.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 1, 2011Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 1, 2010Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 1, 2009Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Jun 1, 2008Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 1, 2007Lead4.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 1, 2006Lead4.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004Lead3.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Show all 29 monitoring periods on record
Monitoring periodMetal90th percentileAction levelStatus
Jan 1, 2024 – Dec 1, 2024Lead2.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 1, 2021Lead3.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 1, 2018Lead2.1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 1, 2015Lead3.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 1, 2012Lead3.6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 1, 2011Lead1 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 1, 2010Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 1, 2009Lead4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2008 – Jun 1, 2008Lead3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 1, 2007Lead4.5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 1, 2006Lead4.4 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004Lead3.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 1, 2004Lead3.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2003 – Dec 31, 2003Lead3.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2002 – Dec 31, 2002Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2001 – Dec 31, 2001Lead5 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 2000 – Dec 31, 2000Lead8.7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1999 – Dec 31, 1999Lead6 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1999 – Jun 30, 1999Lead6.3 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1998 – Dec 31, 1998Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1998 – Jun 30, 1998Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1997 – Dec 31, 1997Lead15 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jan 1, 1997 – Jun 30, 1997Lead11 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1996 – Dec 31, 1996Lead7 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1996 – Jun 30, 1996Lead15 ppb15 ppbat or above the action level
Jul 1, 1995 – Dec 31, 1995Lead9 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1993 – Jun 30, 1993Lead12 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jul 1, 1992 – Dec 31, 1992Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level
Jan 1, 1992 – Jun 30, 1992Lead10 ppb15 ppbbelow the action level

Drinking water violations since Sep 3, 2016

EPA lists 9 violations since Sep 3, 2016. None is health-based. All concern missed monitoring, reporting or public notices, not the water itself. 1 is still open.

EPA's SDWIS database lists 9 violations recorded since Sep 3, 2016: 8 for monitoring or reporting, 1 other (public notification or consumer confidence report requirements), none health-based; 1 is not yet resolved.

Compliance periodTypeContaminant / ruleDescriptionRecordsStatus
Dec 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordArchived
Jun 1, 2024 – Jun 30, 2024MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2024 – Dec 31, 2024MRNitrateMonitoring, Regular1 recordArchived
Dec 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordArchived
Nov 1, 2023 – Nov 30, 2023MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordArchived
Jul 1, 2023OtherConsumer Confidence RuleConsumer Confidence Report Inadequate Reporting1 recordUnaddressed
Jul 1, 2023 – Jul 31, 2023MONRevised Total Coliform RuleMonitoring, Routine (RTCR)1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023MRNitrateMonitoring, Regular1 recordArchived
Jan 1, 2018 – Dec 31, 2018MRNitrateMonitoring, Regular1 recordResolved · 1 enforcement action

Sanitary surveys and site visits

Most recent state inspection: Sep 12, 2025 (reason not recorded); 7 visits since Sep 3, 2021.

What you can do about these results

Filters certified to reduce PFOA and PFOS

EPA testing found 6 PFAS above reporting levels in this utility's water.

Look for NSF/ANSI 53 (activated carbon) or NSF/ANSI 58 (reverse osmosis) certification that names PFOA/PFOS reduction.

Filters certified for lead reduction

2 of this utility's 29 lead monitoring periods on record reached the 15 ppb action level (most recent 90th percentile 2.1 ppb).

NSF/ANSI 53 with a lead-reduction claim, or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. Lead comes from plumbing, so a point-of-use filter at the kitchen tap is the relevant type.

ZIP codes served

Sources

Data vintage: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, samples collected 2023-01-03 – 2026-06-17, final release, August 2026 (file dated Aug 28, 2026); EPA SDWIS via ECHO, 2026Q2 extract (file dated Jul 9, 2026); EPA service-area boundaries v3.0; Census 2020 ZCTAs. Page generated 2026-09-03.

Keep exploring

Every record tells
part of the story.

Find a place. Read the measurements.
Understand the context.

Explore water records